Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I assume these are based on weighted GPAs? If your kid placed in top 5 or 10 percent, what HS and what was their approx weighted gpa for which cutoff (e.g., school name, 4.72, top 10%)? Or does anyone know the actual cutoffs?
My DC won the top 5% award a couple weeks ago, along with about 30 other kids, so 5% of their class of 600ish. It was based on weighted GPA I believe but I don’t know the cutoff.
Anonymous wrote:I assume these are based on weighted GPAs? If your kid placed in top 5 or 10 percent, what HS and what was their approx weighted gpa for which cutoff (e.g., school name, 4.72, top 10%)? Or does anyone know the actual cutoffs?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Did you read it?
40% of students are in the top level in that document.
Yes, I did. It’s a good example of why MCPS doesn’t rank. It’s meaningless when kids take all Hon/AP/IB (weight=+1) and have 4.0 unweighted GPA. As far as the award that OP is referencing from the state, I think a school has to apply for that award for their students. RM didn’t the year my DC graduated, and they had 4.0 and the highest possible WGPA, along with 30-40 other kids (guessing from Naviance.)
Ultimately, it’s a meaningless distinction at many of the high schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:School profile is useless because 20% are in the top tier in the profile.
You mean 40%
Let’s remember this when someone tries to claim public school grades aren’t inflated.