Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hamilton is super woke and obnoxious if your DC doesn't like that.
Hamilton is not woke in today’s context. Very preppy, great alumni network, fairly happy student population. Can’t go wrong with either
Do you have a student they are? My student tells me there are certainly very preppy people there, but they’re also a lot of people with as she would say purple hair. There’s a very artsy/ crunchy population. The a cappella groups and theater is big
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hamilton is super woke and obnoxious if your DC doesn't like that.
Hamilton is not woke in today’s context. Very preppy, great alumni network, fairly happy student population. Can’t go wrong with either
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Carleton possibly better for future PhDs?
Carleton is ranked 6th for PhD production. Hamilton not in top 50.
Carleton also more STEMy: about 50% vs 30%.
Anonymous wrote:Hamilton is super woke and obnoxious if your DC doesn't like that.
Anonymous wrote:Carleton possibly better for future PhDs?
Anonymous wrote:Carleton and Hamilton seem pretty different. I would have thought Carleton is much more intellectual
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hamilton is super woke and obnoxious if your DC doesn't like that.
So is Carlton.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hamilton is super woke and obnoxious if your DC doesn't like that.
This is why I prefer LACs like Colgate and Bucknell. You get a world class liberal arts education, you have bountiful career opportunities right out of college with just a bachelor's degree (Wall Street, consulting, even engineering in the case of Bucknell) and best of all you don't have to deal with in your face wokeness everywhere you turn.
Guess what? Op is not asking that lol
Although OP (me) is kind of interested in the topic. I am wondering if Colgate is significantly better than Hamilton for (business oriented) career purposes. I view Hamilton as the slightly better academic school, and it also seems to have Wall St. connections.
Is Hamilton really all that woke in the scheme of things?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hamilton is super woke and obnoxious if your DC doesn't like that.
This is why I prefer LACs like Colgate and Bucknell. You get a world class liberal arts education, you have bountiful career opportunities right out of college with just a bachelor's degree (Wall Street, consulting, even engineering in the case of Bucknell) and best of all you don't have to deal with in your face wokeness everywhere you turn.
Guess what? Op is not asking that lol
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hamilton is super woke and obnoxious if your DC doesn't like that.
This is why I prefer LACs like Colgate and Bucknell. You get a world class liberal arts education, you have bountiful career opportunities right out of college with just a bachelor's degree (Wall Street, consulting, even engineering in the case of Bucknell) and best of all you don't have to deal with in your face wokeness everywhere you turn.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hamilton is super woke and obnoxious if your DC doesn't like that.
This is why I prefer LACs like Colgate and Bucknell. You get a world class liberal arts education, you have bountiful career opportunities right out of college with just a bachelor's degree (Wall Street, consulting, even engineering in the case of Bucknell) and best of all you don't have to deal with in your face wokeness everywhere you turn.
Anonymous wrote:Hamilton is super woke and obnoxious if your DC doesn't like that.
Anonymous wrote:The approaches to curriculum are very different. That’s one starting point. Carleton definitely came across as more structured (and perhaps a bit rigid, for lack of a better word, in some ways) than Hamilton.
When we visited Hamilton, the students on the tour were very athletic and affluent looking.
Carleton is on a trimester system and has its own study abroad programs.
Hamilton is on a hill and you have go down it to get to the little town.
Both are freezing much of the year.