Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Exercises moves the weight into positions that look better.
Calories don’t work with weight loss.
If your nutritionist said that get a good one, that one sucks.
They should look at how you eat, when u eat, what you eat.
Literally my son just switched to No dairy, sour dough bread extra rice and more protein to help him with his health.
Tell me you have no clue what you’re talking about without telling me you have no clue what you’re talking about.
Tell me you don’t understand science without telling me you were an English major.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Exercises moves the weight into positions that look better.
Calories don’t work with weight loss.
If your nutritionist said that get a good one, that one sucks.
They should look at how you eat, when u eat, what you eat.
Literally my son just switched to No dairy, sour dough bread extra rice and more protein to help him with his health.
Tell me you have no clue what you’re talking about without telling me you have no clue what you’re talking about.
Anonymous wrote:Exercises moves the weight into positions that look better.
Calories don’t work with weight loss.
If your nutritionist said that get a good one, that one sucks.
They should look at how you eat, when u eat, what you eat.
Literally my son just switched to No dairy, sour dough bread extra rice and more protein to help him with his health.
Anonymous wrote:In my experience, she’s correct. I exercise for health, I limit calories for weight loss.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t know, doesn’t really track with my experience. I was about 25-30 pounds overweight as a teen. Moved to a big city as a young adult, where I walked everywhere and also ran a few miles a day, ate a ton of food, and shed all of the weight without trying. In my 40s now and don’t watch what I eat at all, but run a lot and I remain slim and trim.
Slim and trim? 🤔
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's crucial to understand that weight loss is a result of a balanced approach. While diet plays a significant role, exercise is equally important.
Let's delve into the science of weight loss. Exercising is indeed beneficial, but it's effective in weight loss only when you maintain a caloric deficit, meaning you burn more calories than you consume.
It is true that you can't outrun the fork. So, why did I say exercise matters? If you eat 5000 calories, no exercise will matter, but if you are eating 2-2.5k calories, it matters a lot.
I can never lose weight just by eating less; it is not sustainable for me. I do 45 minutes of fast walking at 4.5 miles an hour and start losing weight immediately. But I do not start adding calories.
Once you have muscles, you will burn more fat just by sitting around. I weigh around 122 lbs, and I can go up to 130 lbs; in order for any weight to move at my age and weight, I have to reset my body. This means I have to eat a lot for a few days to tell my body to keep burning the calories. Then I added exercise, and then I start eating less.
I am 53, and all I am trying to do is lose a few pounds in my stomach. It is not as easy as it was when I was 40 or 30. But when I add the 45 minutes, it is a huge difference in losing a few pounds. I think it should be an even bigger difference for a person who is actually overweight.
I thought you were going to delve? Where is the delving?
Anonymous wrote:It's crucial to understand that weight loss is a result of a balanced approach. While diet plays a significant role, exercise is equally important.
Let's delve into the science of weight loss. Exercising is indeed beneficial, but it's effective in weight loss only when you maintain a caloric deficit, meaning you burn more calories than you consume.
It is true that you can't outrun the fork. So, why did I say exercise matters? If you eat 5000 calories, no exercise will matter, but if you are eating 2-2.5k calories, it matters a lot.
I can never lose weight just by eating less; it is not sustainable for me. I do 45 minutes of fast walking at 4.5 miles an hour and start losing weight immediately. But I do not start adding calories.
Once you have muscles, you will burn more fat just by sitting around. I weigh around 122 lbs, and I can go up to 130 lbs; in order for any weight to move at my age and weight, I have to reset my body. This means I have to eat a lot for a few days to tell my body to keep burning the calories. Then I added exercise, and then I start eating less.
I am 53, and all I am trying to do is lose a few pounds in my stomach. It is not as easy as it was when I was 40 or 30. But when I add the 45 minutes, it is a huge difference in losing a few pounds. I think it should be an even bigger difference for a person who is actually overweight.
Anonymous wrote:Of course she’ll overstate food intake because she’s a nutritionist. What do you think a personal trainer would say?
It’s genetics, calories, exercise.