Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FCPS parents are kept in the dark about math acceleration options such as Algebra1 in 6th grade, and lack of that awareness impacts URM families the most. Equity battalion wants to limit URM students to general ed and remedial classes.
Algebra1 at 6th grade needs recommendation for math teacher in 4th grade so that the student can take IAAT at 5th grade. It's only for the most advanced students. It is not healthy to advocating for Algebra1 in 6th grade.
That's how URM students are being suppressed. It is insulting and racist to tell students that advanced education is unhealthy, especially when students nationwide succeed in advanced math at a higher rate after enrollment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FCPS parents are kept in the dark about math acceleration options such as Algebra1 in 6th grade, and lack of that awareness impacts URM families the most. Equity battalion wants to limit URM students to general ed and remedial classes.
Algebra1 at 6th grade needs recommendation for math teacher in 4th grade so that the student can take IAAT at 5th grade. It's only for the most advanced students. It is not healthy to advocating for Algebra1 in 6th grade.
That's how URM students are being suppressed. It is insulting and racist to tell students that advanced education is unhealthy, especially when students nationwide succeed in advanced math at a higher rate after enrollment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The requirements for taking algebra 1 in 8th or 9th are reasonable, the requirements for taking it in 6th are not.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's only a matter of time before parents sue FCPS for creating numerous barriers that prevent any advanced 6th-grade students from enrolling in Algebra 1.
You are against raising the bar?
It is reasonable for a small fraction of the students to take it in 6th.
Several points here. First, the school should at least try to accommodate and meet the students where they are, within reason. Second, knowledge is knowledge, if the student takes a class elsewhere and passes the class standards they should be placed appropriately.
Equity politics necessitates certain students to firmly be in the lower gen ed and remedial classes, and great measures are taken to hide access to information about advanced acceleration options. Case in point: there is not a single document accessible to URM families to know about math acceleration options, such as algebra 1 in 6th grade, but plenty of neon signs and street fliers doing outreach about the availability of remedial math options.
Maybe your kid wasn’t identified as a Young Scholar?
https://www.fcps.edu/academics/elementary/advanced-academic-programs/young-scholars
Young Scholars is a show-off program that highlights a few students who would have performed at that level even without it. The success rate is less than 2%, especially at advanced level. No Young Scholar has ever won a MathCounts or Math Olympiad competition, or even come close to achieving something similar.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The requirements for taking algebra 1 in 8th or 9th are reasonable, the requirements for taking it in 6th are not.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's only a matter of time before parents sue FCPS for creating numerous barriers that prevent any advanced 6th-grade students from enrolling in Algebra 1.
You are against raising the bar?
It is reasonable for a small fraction of the students to take it in 6th.
Several points here. First, the school should at least try to accommodate and meet the students where they are, within reason. Second, knowledge is knowledge, if the student takes a class elsewhere and passes the class standards they should be placed appropriately.
Equity politics necessitates certain students to firmly be in the lower gen ed and remedial classes, and great measures are taken to hide access to information about advanced acceleration options. Case in point: there is not a single document accessible to URM families to know about math acceleration options, such as algebra 1 in 6th grade, but plenty of neon signs and street fliers doing outreach about the availability of remedial math options.
Maybe your kid wasn’t identified as a Young Scholar?
https://www.fcps.edu/academics/elementary/advanced-academic-programs/young-scholars
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's only a matter of time before parents sue FCPS for creating numerous barriers that prevent any advanced 6th-grade students from enrolling in Algebra 1.
Based on what state law?
A series of them, but can start with discrimination against URM students access to advanced math.
Again, what state law? It's conveniently all online
https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/
What law do you think FCPS 6th grade math placement violates?
Current laws and policies are discriminatory. If they weren't, one would see many URMs in advanced math, not in gen ed and remedial.
The AAP equity report showed that URMs were being placed in AAP with significantly lower test scores than white and Asian kids. If anything, FCPS is bending over backward to try to find any URMs who might have the slightest chance of being successful in advanced classes.
That is the problem. By lowering the bar, FCPS is implying that URM students cannot get into advanced classes on their own merit. By creating a substandard entry point, now the URM students are being setup for failure. Instead if URM students and most importantly their parents were informed on the all advanced acceleration options, especially algbera 1 in 6th grade, and increase awareness of what it truly takes to get there, more URM families have a better chance of preparing their students for success.
Things like Young Scholars is FCPS trying to get families dialed in on acceleration opportunities. FCPS does many things very poorly, but saying the purposefully hide 6th grade Algebra 1 from URMs is just absurd and you know it. They purposefully hide it from everyone so they don't have 11 year olds tanking their high school GPAs!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's only a matter of time before parents sue FCPS for creating numerous barriers that prevent any advanced 6th-grade students from enrolling in Algebra 1.
Based on what state law?
A series of them, but can start with discrimination against URM students access to advanced math.
Again, what state law? It's conveniently all online
https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/
What law do you think FCPS 6th grade math placement violates?
Current laws and policies are discriminatory. If they weren't, one would see many URMs in advanced math, not in gen ed and remedial.
The AAP equity report showed that URMs were being placed in AAP with significantly lower test scores than white and Asian kids. If anything, FCPS is bending over backward to try to find any URMs who might have the slightest chance of being successful in advanced classes.
That is the problem. By lowering the bar, FCPS is implying that URM students cannot get into advanced classes on their own merit. By creating a substandard entry point, now the URM students are being setup for failure. Instead if URM students and most importantly their parents were informed on the all advanced acceleration options, especially algbera 1 in 6th grade, and increase awareness of what it truly takes to get there, more URM families have a better chance of preparing their students for success.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FCPS parents are kept in the dark about math acceleration options such as Algebra1 in 6th grade, and lack of that awareness impacts URM families the most. Equity battalion wants to limit URM students to general ed and remedial classes.
Algebra1 at 6th grade needs recommendation for math teacher in 4th grade so that the student can take IAAT at 5th grade. It's only for the most advanced students. It is not healthy to advocating for Algebra1 in 6th grade.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's only a matter of time before parents sue FCPS for creating numerous barriers that prevent any advanced 6th-grade students from enrolling in Algebra 1.
Based on what state law?
A series of them, but can start with discrimination against URM students access to advanced math.
Again, what state law? It's conveniently all online
https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/
What law do you think FCPS 6th grade math placement violates?
Current laws and policies are discriminatory. If they weren't, one would see many URMs in advanced math, not in gen ed and remedial.
The AAP equity report showed that URMs were being placed in AAP with significantly lower test scores than white and Asian kids. If anything, FCPS is bending over backward to try to find any URMs who might have the slightest chance of being successful in advanced classes.
Anonymous wrote:FCPS parents are kept in the dark about math acceleration options such as Algebra1 in 6th grade, and lack of that awareness impacts URM families the most. Equity battalion wants to limit URM students to general ed and remedial classes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's only a matter of time before parents sue FCPS for creating numerous barriers that prevent any advanced 6th-grade students from enrolling in Algebra 1.
Based on what state law?
A series of them, but can start with discrimination against URM students access to advanced math.
Equity minions are freaking out just by the thought of URM students in advanced math
Um, no. “Equity minions” are trying to get more URM kids into accelerated math.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's only a matter of time before parents sue FCPS for creating numerous barriers that prevent any advanced 6th-grade students from enrolling in Algebra 1.
Based on what state law?
A series of them, but can start with discrimination against URM students access to advanced math.
Again, what state law? It's conveniently all online
https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/
What law do you think FCPS 6th grade math placement violates?
Current laws and policies are discriminatory. If they weren't, one would see many URMs in advanced math, not in gen ed and remedial.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The requirements for taking algebra 1 in 8th or 9th are reasonable, the requirements for taking it in 6th are not.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's only a matter of time before parents sue FCPS for creating numerous barriers that prevent any advanced 6th-grade students from enrolling in Algebra 1.
You are against raising the bar?
It is reasonable for a small fraction of the students to take it in 6th.
Several points here. First, the school should at least try to accommodate and meet the students where they are, within reason. Second, knowledge is knowledge, if the student takes a class elsewhere and passes the class standards they should be placed appropriately.
Equity politics necessitates certain students to firmly be in the lower gen ed and remedial classes, and great measures are taken to hide access to information about advanced acceleration options. Case in point: there is not a single document accessible to URM families to know about math acceleration options, such as algebra 1 in 6th grade, but plenty of neon signs and street fliers doing outreach about the availability of remedial math options.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's only a matter of time before parents sue FCPS for creating numerous barriers that prevent any advanced 6th-grade students from enrolling in Algebra 1.
Based on what state law?
A series of them, but can start with discrimination against URM students access to advanced math.
Equity minions are freaking out just by the thought of URM students in advanced math