Anonymous wrote:A few times a year I'd suck it up or you will look bad.
Anonymous wrote:A few times per year our company gets lunch from our vendors.
I normally eat and mingle a bit with other co-workers I barely see, then I go out for my lunch break. (1hr.)
I was just told by my supervisor, that I needed to use this time as my lunch break. My Contract says 8-5 with 1hr. break.
I honestly would rather take my break than attend these lunch breaks. There is no policy in the company and people do different things from eating at their desk during lunch to going out during lunch.
Is he reasonable to ask for this? I do not have work pending at my desk and it is not interfering with my work.
What Companies/employees normally do?
Anonymous wrote:Your supervisor must find you really rigid. Goodness.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are not talking like a team player. It's a free lunch, which you say you partake in and a chance to network with coworkers.
But here you are quibbling over getting "cheated" out of an hour's pay a few times a year in exchange for the above.
You are not valuing team-building company events.
"Team Player" = when I am getting paid. If its my lunch break I am not getting paid and there is no team and I am not playing.
Company events should be paid if mandatory. Implicitly or explicitly mandatory.
Is this OP again? Do you clock in and clock out, like a fast food worker, for example who rightly has pay protections for overtime and shift differentials? Are you a nonexempt employee who is either on the clock or not?
If not, lose this mentality. Your boss is watching.
I am not OP but OP states they have a contract from 8-5 with a 1-hour break. There are some companies that work like this and will pay for overtime over 40 hours. My company is one such company because as another poster has so eloquently pointed out most companies expect a minimum of 40 but only pay a maximum of 40. If I have to use PTO to take an hour doctors appointment but I am still working 40+ hours the whole idea of exempt employee is a sham.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are not talking like a team player. It's a free lunch, which you say you partake in and a chance to network with coworkers.
But here you are quibbling over getting "cheated" out of an hour's pay a few times a year in exchange for the above.
You are not valuing team-building company events.
"Team Player" = when I am getting paid. If its my lunch break I am not getting paid and there is no team and I am not playing.
Company events should be paid if mandatory. Implicitly or explicitly mandatory.
Is this OP again? Do you clock in and clock out, like a fast food worker, for example who rightly has pay protections for overtime and shift differentials? Are you a nonexempt employee who is either on the clock or not?
If not, lose this mentality. Your boss is watching.
Anonymous wrote:A FEW times per year?
Yes, that is your [free] lunch break.
If your supv. said something to you, it is a big deal by now.
Are you an hourly clock in/clock out employee? Your OP reads like one, not an exempt professional staffer.
Anonymous wrote:You are not talking like a team player. It's a free lunch, which you say you partake in and a chance to network with coworkers.
But here you are quibbling over getting "cheated" out of an hour's pay a few times a year in exchange for the above.
You are not valuing team-building company events.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They are requiring you to go to these lunch events? Then that is your lunch break.
I think if you are going to this lunch break and then taking a second lunch break, then don't.
Nooo a mandatory company event is not a break. Lunch break is unpaid. If they are requiring attendance, it should be paid.