Anonymous wrote:PP here - NO coach is taking a kid under their wing unless they are a rockstar. It's all about that club. Most people just want their kid to rise to top team. The problem is it depends on how solid that club is - being on top team of a club is not equal in all clubs. The development you are talking about comes from yourself. Personal trainers, watching soccer, the drive and fun of wanting to play well. Sorry but they aren't pros - the coach is not going to spend that much time with any individual kid at practice. Name me one coach of a team that provides that mentorship to a kid!?
I do not want to name the club we joined but I will tell you that it has an excellent reputation and while we may never get on the top team, being on their 3rd team is akin to being on the top team at most clubs because they are that strong.
This being said, it truly depends on the situation. Why you are leaving a club, what you are hoping to gain from the experience of soccer/the move, etc. How good the clubs as a whole you are considering by reputation, by age group of that club, by the coaches of the clubs, etc. So I'm not suggesting it's 100% the right move to join a top club.
BUT, apples to apples, our experience is that it absolutely does not matter where you start. You want to be with an excellent club. Whether you are top team or last team on that club - the goal is to do the best you can do in a space that is meaningful. That's a life thing not just a soccer thing.
Anonymous wrote:You're assuming that there is any organizational continuity between the top teams and bottom teams at large clubs. The D team is not practicing with the A team. The A team coach will not even know your kid exists. The technical director and any age group coordinators do not care about that team. When you kid shows up for tryouts the next year, they are already labeled. Meanwhile, smaller clubs care about their teams and if the team happens to be one of their better teams, they will get attention from the TD. They aren't automatically slotted (can't have the C team rising above the B team), so they'll play as high as they are capable of playing both in league play and in tournament brackets
Anonymous wrote:And by the way - BS that a top club will not promote an excellent player. I've seen it over and over and applicable to us personally. Excellent clubs want to win. They do not want to lose - esp big clubs who have a reputation. But you do have to stand out. It will drive you to be better and work harder because yes, it is a lot of kids and you will be passed over unless you are that good. So be that good.
Small club? Way more politics because strength of personal relationships easier to build in a small place. Big club? Not a lot of time - everyone's too busy. That's also our experience. Terrible players on top teams.
Big club? Top team is #1 State. Small club? Top team is waaaay down on that list.
Anonymous wrote:Depending on the club, if you are looking for kid to improve and teach the importance of getting better = moving up, go with club B.
We did this. From top team at a losing club to mid-tier at a highly rated but large club. My kid moved up. She was unafraid of starting low and rising. I gotta hand it to her - I really respect her for this attitude.
Way too many people just want to be on a top team - even if that team is a loser team - because they like to think of their kid as awesome. The truth is, it's better to join a top organization and rise than it is to be with an organization that is irrelevant at the top. Even if you never make it to the top of a top organization, you'll prob be still pretty damn good because in a large club, providing that they are respectable, has certain standards.
In any case, it's a good lesson for kids. I agree with coaching better at top levels but at some point it's not about the coach - it's about the kid developing themselves. That's a lesson that is more valuable than winning or losing a game.
Anonymous wrote:Depending on the club, if you are looking for kid to improve and teach the importance of getting better = moving up, go with club B.
We did this. From top team at a losing club to mid-tier at a highly rated but large club. My kid moved up. She was unafraid of starting low and rising. I gotta hand it to her - I really respect her for this attitude.
Way too many people just want to be on a top team - even if that team is a loser team - because they like to think of their kid as awesome. The truth is, it's better to join a top organization and rise than it is to be with an organization that is irrelevant at the top. Even if you never make it to the top of a top organization, you'll prob be still pretty damn good because in a large club, providing that they are respectable, has certain standards.
In any case, it's a good lesson for kids. I agree with coaching better at top levels but at some point it's not about the coach - it's about the kid developing themselves. That's a lesson that is more valuable than winning or losing a game.
It's never where you start - esp U9 - so much time to improve!! My kid wanted to jump ship sooner but I gave another year at the "top" team.
Anonymous wrote:What league/division is small club a team in?
Generally I’d vote for small club as long as they have a decent coach, turf field access and a decent league to play in.