Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would think you exclude retirement savings and college savings because a creditor can't reach those things. But I'm guessing. I am a lawyer, though, so it's not an entirely uneducated guess!
This is OP and that’s my guess too but I can’t find any definitive confirmation of it.
Literally everyone. And we have multiple houses, multiples cars, multiple rentals, multiple drivers. Geico insured us when we had $2M (it actually was less than $200 at the time) but once we needed more than $5M we switch to State Farm.
I don’t think it’s a hard fast rule. You need to have enough insurance that whoever is suing you is happy to take the max amount without going after you personally.
If you have a 2 million dollar policy and 2 million in liquid assets and two million in retirement assets a 4 million dollar verdict puts you on the hook for 2 million.
That being said verdicts like that are rare (and attorneys who will turn down a 2 million insurance payout to try to chase down money from an individual is also going to be rare). Of course the rareness is why it’s so cheap but I know you don’t want to hear about that.
It’s not cheap as far as I’m concerned. $800 a year is still a lot of money to me as while it network is relatively high our income is not.
$800 for how much coverage? Generally you can get $2m for less than $300. It’s actually the only insurance that I know of that gets more expensive per million as you go up. I pay $2088 for $10M
Wow! Where did you get that insane rate? You must have no pets and no drivers on your cars. I was quoted much higher for 1 M. We had 2 teen drivers at the time and a dog. We don’t have a huge net worth so 1 M is plenty for us.
^^to clarify, I was referring to $2M for less than $300.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would think you exclude retirement savings and college savings because a creditor can't reach those things. But I'm guessing. I am a lawyer, though, so it's not an entirely uneducated guess!
This is OP and that’s my guess too but I can’t find any definitive confirmation of it.
I don’t think it’s a hard fast rule. You need to have enough insurance that whoever is suing you is happy to take the max amount without going after you personally.
If you have a 2 million dollar policy and 2 million in liquid assets and two million in retirement assets a 4 million dollar verdict puts you on the hook for 2 million.
That being said verdicts like that are rare (and attorneys who will turn down a 2 million insurance payout to try to chase down money from an individual is also going to be rare). Of course the rareness is why it’s so cheap but I know you don’t want to hear about that.
It’s not cheap as far as I’m concerned. $800 a year is still a lot of money to me as while it network is relatively high our income is not.
$800 for how much coverage? Generally you can get $2m for less than $300. It’s actually the only insurance that I know of that gets more expensive per million as you go up. I pay $2088 for $10M
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We started with $2M now upped it to $4M. The relationship to net worth is if you kill somebody in a car accident because you have a medical incident and pass out and it's your fault and they sue you the insurance covers the first $4M of damages awarded.
Your house and jewelry and assets don't get liquidated until after the $4M. FFS it's worth several hundred a year to avoid that
But if they win $8 million then you still owe $4 million.
Anonymous wrote:We started with $2M now upped it to $4M. The relationship to net worth is if you kill somebody in a car accident because you have a medical incident and pass out and it's your fault and they sue you the insurance covers the first $4M of damages awarded.
Your house and jewelry and assets don't get liquidated until after the $4M. FFS it's worth several hundred a year to avoid that
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Your net worth doesn’t have that much to do with how much umbrella insurance you should take out.
You’re an idiot and have no idea what umbrella insurance even is.
I may be an idiot, but I do know what umbrella insurance is. Can you explain to me the exact mechanism linking your net worth to the size of potential judgments against you, aside from the general point that if they know you are rich they are more likely to come after you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would think you exclude retirement savings and college savings because a creditor can't reach those things. But I'm guessing. I am a lawyer, though, so it's not an entirely uneducated guess!
This is OP and that’s my guess too but I can’t find any definitive confirmation of it.
I don’t think it’s a hard fast rule. You need to have enough insurance that whoever is suing you is happy to take the max amount without going after you personally.
If you have a 2 million dollar policy and 2 million in liquid assets and two million in retirement assets a 4 million dollar verdict puts you on the hook for 2 million.
That being said verdicts like that are rare (and attorneys who will turn down a 2 million insurance payout to try to chase down money from an individual is also going to be rare). Of course the rareness is why it’s so cheap but I know you don’t want to hear about that.
It’s not cheap as far as I’m concerned. $800 a year is still a lot of money to me as while it network is relatively high our income is not.
If you don't understand that income that net worth is money you can spend, and that income contributes to net worth, you probably shouldn't be the person making financial decisions in your life.
You can cash out or borrow $50K from your net worth, to cover $800/year for the rest of your life.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would think you exclude retirement savings and college savings because a creditor can't reach those things. But I'm guessing. I am a lawyer, though, so it's not an entirely uneducated guess!
This is OP and that’s my guess too but I can’t find any definitive confirmation of it.
I don’t think it’s a hard fast rule. You need to have enough insurance that whoever is suing you is happy to take the max amount without going after you personally.
If you have a 2 million dollar policy and 2 million in liquid assets and two million in retirement assets a 4 million dollar verdict puts you on the hook for 2 million.
That being said verdicts like that are rare (and attorneys who will turn down a 2 million insurance payout to try to chase down money from an individual is also going to be rare). Of course the rareness is why it’s so cheap but I know you don’t want to hear about that.
It’s not cheap as far as I’m concerned. $800 a year is still a lot of money to me as while it network is relatively high our income is not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Your net worth doesn’t have that much to do with how much umbrella insurance you should take out.
You’re an idiot and have no idea what umbrella insurance even is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Your net worth doesn’t have that much to do with how much umbrella insurance you should take out.
You’re an idiot and have no idea what umbrella insurance even is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would think you exclude retirement savings and college savings because a creditor can't reach those things. But I'm guessing. I am a lawyer, though, so it's not an entirely uneducated guess!
This is OP and that’s my guess too but I can’t find any definitive confirmation of it.
I don’t think it’s a hard fast rule. You need to have enough insurance that whoever is suing you is happy to take the max amount without going after you personally.
If you have a 2 million dollar policy and 2 million in liquid assets and two million in retirement assets a 4 million dollar verdict puts you on the hook for 2 million.
That being said verdicts like that are rare (and attorneys who will turn down a 2 million insurance payout to try to chase down money from an individual is also going to be rare). Of course the rareness is why it’s so cheap but I know you don’t want to hear about that.
It’s not cheap as far as I’m concerned. $800 a year is still a lot of money to me as while it network is relatively high our income is not.
$800 for how much coverage? Generally you can get $2m for less than $300. It’s actually the only insurance that I know of that gets more expensive per million as you go up. I pay $2088 for $10M
Actually it’s not $800. It’s $671 for $2m, and no I can’t get it any less expensive. Or $895 for $3m. So no $2m is not available for $300 for me.
Anonymous wrote:Your net worth doesn’t have that much to do with how much umbrella insurance you should take out.