Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Now watch them get rejected from TJ.
Those kids will be fine anywhere while TJ would make a huge difference in an underprivileged child's life trajectory.
Hypothetical Counterpoint: With TJ's advanced math classes, they continue on the path to finally solving Goldbach's conjecture. The underprivileged kid, on the other hand, goes from being top in his high school and getting accepted into Harvard (full ride due to low income) to being bottom of his class at TJ and attending a local college below his potential.
Why should a kid whose school doesn't offer mathcounts be disadvantaged? If FCPS wants to use something as a data point for admission, they need to make sure it is available in all middle schools
Even if it were available at all schools across the county, there aren't going to be any other kids with the raw aptitude to make Mathcounts top 12. Extra middle school programming is not going to turn a kid into a math prodigy. People who make the argument that the PP did just don't grasp how advanced and amazing these kids are.
Also, any kid who wants to participate can do so. Mathcounts allows kids to register and compete as an independent student if their school doesn't have a team or if they're homeschooled.
My kid well in Mathcounts although not nearly as well as the 2 in this thread. He was naturally good at math, but no prodigy. What separates the really good Mathcounts kid and the great Math counts kid is a lot of practice. That practice happens at home. One can possibly find a prodigy among the Mathcounts contestants, but it's overwhelmingingly kids just putting in the work to be fast.
Do you consider a kid who attend the Scripps spelling bee a spelling prodigy? How about the National Geography Bowl or the National History Bee?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Now watch them get rejected from TJ.
Those kids will be fine anywhere while TJ would make a huge difference in an underprivileged child's life trajectory.
Hypothetical Counterpoint: With TJ's advanced math classes, they continue on the path to finally solving Goldbach's conjecture. The underprivileged kid, on the other hand, goes from being top in his high school and getting accepted into Harvard (full ride due to low income) to being bottom of his class at TJ and attending a local college below his potential.
Don't the high schools that Longfellow and Carson feed into ALSO offer dual enrollment post-AP math courses through George Mason, the exact same track TJ offers?
No. TJ has special dual enrollment courses beyond multivariable and linear algebra only offered at TJ. If these kids are taking pre-calc or calc in 8th, they will run out of math classes at McLean, even with dual enrollment. Likewise, if they're physics oriented, their offerings will cap at AP Physics C, rather than the many post-AP classes offered at TJ.
The argument that "those kids will be fine anywhere" is absurd. TJ is made for kids who have academic needs that can't be met at their base school. These kids need TJ and its expanded offerings. Whether or not TJ would make a huge difference for an underprivileged child is irrelevant. These kids aren't competing for spots against kids at lower SES schools. They're competing against the other privileged but much less advanced and much less accomplished kids at Longfellow and Carson.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Now watch them get rejected from TJ.
Those kids will be fine anywhere while TJ would make a huge difference in an underprivileged child's life trajectory.
Hypothetical Counterpoint: With TJ's advanced math classes, they continue on the path to finally solving Goldbach's conjecture. The underprivileged kid, on the other hand, goes from being top in his high school and getting accepted into Harvard (full ride due to low income) to being bottom of his class at TJ and attending a local college below his potential.
Why should a kid whose school doesn't offer mathcounts be disadvantaged? If FCPS wants to use something as a data point for admission, they need to make sure it is available in all middle schools
Even if it were available at all schools across the county, there aren't going to be any other kids with the raw aptitude to make Mathcounts top 12. Extra middle school programming is not going to turn a kid into a math prodigy. People who make the argument that the PP did just don't grasp how advanced and amazing these kids are.
Also, any kid who wants to participate can do so. Mathcounts allows kids to register and compete as an independent student if their school doesn't have a team or if they're homeschooled.
Anonymous wrote:Wow Chinese Americans are dominating Math competitions
Anonymous wrote:I don’t oppose setting aside 30%-35% of seats at TJ for low-income and URM students. They should select the best candidates in those group of students. Moreover, they should make sure that the remaining seats will go to the brightest and most motivated students in the county. The current lottery admissions has failed in all aspects.
Anonymous wrote:TJ isn’t just math class.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Now watch them get rejected from TJ.
Those kids will be fine anywhere while TJ would make a huge difference in an underprivileged child's life trajectory.
Hypothetical Counterpoint: With TJ's advanced math classes, they continue on the path to finally solving Goldbach's conjecture. The underprivileged kid, on the other hand, goes from being top in his high school and getting accepted into Harvard (full ride due to low income) to being bottom of his class at TJ and attending a local college below his potential.
Don't the high schools that Longfellow and Carson feed into ALSO offer dual enrollment post-AP math courses through George Mason, the exact same track TJ offers?