Anonymous wrote:I had my removed. the 3 Fs are fertile, female, forties. I don't think it necessarily comes from bad diet.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No! Why? Why would you do that if you don’t have to?
I can only see this if you were going to live in Antarctica or something.
because it’s an easy surgery and better than ending up in emergency surgery later?
Surgery has a lot more risk than the possibility of surgery.
Surgery has a lot lower risk than gallstone pancreatitis, which has a 15% risk of death on admission. Or did when it happened to me.
Schedule the surgery, OP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:otherwise healthy 40 year old woman who has discovered my gallbladder is completely full of stones. no obvious symptoms related to this, but would it be proactive to have it removed?
Troll alert? How exactly does a healthy person with no symptoms suddenly discover her gallbladder is completely full of stones?
not a troll. I have Gilbert’s syndrome and estrogen dominance which I believe are to blame…
You avoided the question.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:otherwise healthy 40 year old woman who has discovered my gallbladder is completely full of stones. no obvious symptoms related to this, but would it be proactive to have it removed?
Troll alert? How exactly does a healthy person with no symptoms suddenly discover her gallbladder is completely full of stones?
not a troll. I have Gilbert’s syndrome and estrogen dominance which I believe are to blame…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:otherwise healthy 40 year old woman who has discovered my gallbladder is completely full of stones. no obvious symptoms related to this, but would it be proactive to have it removed?
Troll alert? How exactly does a healthy person with no symptoms suddenly discover her gallbladder is completely full of stones?
not a troll. I have Gilbert’s syndrome and estrogen dominance which I believe are to blame…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No! Why? Why would you do that if you don’t have to?
I can only see this if you were going to live in Antarctica or something.
because it’s an easy surgery and better than ending up in emergency surgery later?
Surgery has a lot more risk than the possibility of surgery.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No! Why? Why would you do that if you don’t have to?
I can only see this if you were going to live in Antarctica or something.
because it’s an easy surgery and better than ending up in emergency surgery later?
Surgery has a lot more risk than the possibility of surgery.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No! Why? Why would you do that if you don’t have to?
I can only see this if you were going to live in Antarctica or something.
because it’s an easy surgery and better than ending up in emergency surgery later?