Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Silicon valley home prices are distorted because of zoning keeping them SFHs rather than making best use of the land given demand. These homes are not gems bur demand is crazy.
California already made single family zoning illegal because YIMBY's want to destroy the American Dream. If you are going to complain about zoning policies at least stay up to date on the new rules.
Anonymous wrote:We were looking to buy in Massachusetts - 2-2.5 mil, until I did this very calculation. Would cost us hundreds of thousands in a down payment plus $15-20k / month (almost all interest) to buy … or we could just rent for $5-6k and put that money in the market.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In case anyone wants to look, the going rate for a SFH or townhouse rental in Cupertino is in the $4-6K range for a 3BR. So $6K is actually on the higher end of what's available.
https://www.zillow.com/cupertino-ca/rentals/?searchQueryState=%7B%22pagination%22%3A%7B%7D%2C%22isMapVisible%22%3Atrue%2C%22mapBounds%22%3A%7B%22west%22%3A-122.10998432861328%2C%22east%22%3A-122.0095624230957%2C%22south%22%3A37.287908784262335%2C%22north%22%3A37.34142675180764%7D%2C%22regionSelection%22%3A%5B%7B%22regionId%22%3A4281%2C%22regionType%22%3A6%7D%5D%2C%22filterState%22%3A%7B%22sort%22%3A%7B%22value%22%3A%22priorityscore%22%7D%2C%22ah%22%3A%7B%22value%22%3Atrue%7D%2C%22fr%22%3A%7B%22value%22%3Atrue%7D%2C%22fsba%22%3A%7B%22value%22%3Afalse%7D%2C%22fsbo%22%3A%7B%22value%22%3Afalse%7D%2C%22nc%22%3A%7B%22value%22%3Afalse%7D%2C%22cmsn%22%3A%7B%22value%22%3Afalse%7D%2C%22auc%22%3A%7B%22value%22%3Afalse%7D%2C%22fore%22%3A%7B%22value%22%3Afalse%7D%2C%22apco%22%3A%7B%22value%22%3Afalse%7D%2C%22apa%22%3A%7B%22value%22%3Afalse%7D%2C%22con%22%3A%7B%22value%22%3Afalse%7D%7D%2C%22isEntirePlaceForRent%22%3Atrue%2C%22isRoomForRent%22%3Afalse%2C%22isListVisible%22%3Atrue%2C%22mapZoom%22%3A14%7D
That doesn't seem outrageous for rent. I live in McLean and the 60-year-old SFH rent for $5k+. And the new builds are also $3M.
I know someone in Palo Alto and they choose to rent, because home prices are too high.
Palo Alto now feels like the kind of place where unless you make Founder-level money on an IPO, you put in your 10-20 years and GTFO once you've made your nut (all while trying to keep housing costs as low as possible). $5K for a house in Cupertino is not bad at all. If you're a FAANG engineer, you will bank plenty of money and invest it in the market. Maybe buy a rental home in a lower COL area where you will want to retire.
The issue with Cupertino is that all the housing stock was bought up in the 1st tech wave. People have kept those houses as rentals since the late 90s and they are sitting on deferred asset gold mine.
Look at the Redfin house that sold: https://www.redfin.com/CA/Cupertino/10325-Bonny-Dr-95014/home/597865?600390594=copy_variant&1778901559=variant&utm_source=ios_share&utm_medium=share&utm_nooverride=1&utm_content=link&utm_campaign=share_sheet
Bought in 1995 for $410K and taxes frozen at that level ever since. Sold in Feb 2024 for $3.45M. Insane. This is a very standard middle class house in California; I grew up one remarkably similar in SoCal.
Anonymous wrote:Not that hard to do the math. It is definitely that way right now for almost any house assuming 20% down and a 7%+ interest rate. If you don’t believe me pick any house for rent on Zillow right now that sold recently and compare the asking rent with what a mortgage with 20% down would be. Not only will the rent be lower significantly, you will be also able to invest your down payment and transaction cost of buying. And as a bonus maintenance is someone else’s problem. Purely financially renting makes a lot of sense now. Having your own place however has other advantages and if those matter enough to you, then go ahead and buy if you can afford it. Life is too short.
Anonymous wrote:Silicon valley home prices are distorted because of zoning keeping them SFHs rather than making best use of the land given demand. These homes are not gems bur demand is crazy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I live in California. My rent is $1650 for a small one bedroom with no bathtub, no dishwasher and two closets. I can't afford to buy. Anything. At all.
Unless I moved to the middle of nowhere and bought a shack.
This would be considered reasonable rent if located in a decent area of DC.
Anonymous wrote:I live in California. My rent is $1650 for a small one bedroom with no bathtub, no dishwasher and two closets. I can't afford to buy. Anything. At all.
Unless I moved to the middle of nowhere and bought a shack.
Anonymous wrote:It's always going to be location dependent. There is not obvious answer that will be true across the country. The answer is different in Silicon Valley, DC, NYC, Chicago, Phoenix, Austin, and Minneapolis. These cities have different costs of living, different housing demands, different housing stock, etc.
You just have to compare the costs in the place where you live, and decide what makes the most sense for you. Or even better, seek out a location that enables you to do the thing you want to do. For instance, if I was just starting out and buying a home was very important to me, I would probably not move to Silicon Valley (unless I had some hug $$$ FANG job that enabled me to buy regardless) because I wouldn't be able to accomplish my goal.
You just have to make these decisions on a personal level.