Anonymous wrote:You mean undergrad matters? Shocking. I was told that there was a college for everyone and that it didn't matter if a kid went to an ivy
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Middle class kids with lots of loans don't become journalists nearly as often as their 1%er peers.
And that impacts the breadth and quality of the journalism, and the ability of papers to serve the public interest. Journalists who grow up in the 1%/Ivy League bubble don't have an understanding of what goes on outside it - which is why there are so many news stories expressing confusion about how bad consumer sentiment is when the stock market and employment rates are so high. When you have never had to worry about your grocery bill or housing costs or credit card interest rates, and you have never really talked to anyone without a college degree (unless that person does manual labor for you), you are just not going to understand.
Yes. Journalism has a huge class problem, inside and out.
Well no one here is going to like this, but that’s basically the premise of Batya Ungar-Sargon’s book, “Bad News: How Woke Media Is Undermining Democracy”. I think she nailed the issue, others may disagree.
Not very smart to title your book something that guarantees that no one you need to persuade will take you seriously. But a good choice for grifting the confirmation bias crowd.
Anonymous wrote:I'm a former journalist married to a current journalist. Most journalists are not independently wealthy, and most journalists make enough money to live. They're not getting rich, but a journalist with 20 years of experience at a major newspaper is making far more than a teacher with 20 years of experience.
Also, it doesn't surprise me that the NYT has a lot of Ivy Leaguers. Ivies all have highly regarded daily newspapers that give students a lot of great experience, and there are also strong alumni networks at papers like the NYT.
Anonymous wrote:This might explain the frequent plagiarism scandals at the NYT.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Middle class kids with lots of loans don't become journalists nearly as often as their 1%er peers.
And that impacts the breadth and quality of the journalism, and the ability of papers to serve the public interest. Journalists who grow up in the 1%/Ivy League bubble don't have an understanding of what goes on outside it - which is why there are so many news stories expressing confusion about how bad consumer sentiment is when the stock market and employment rates are so high. When you have never had to worry about your grocery bill or housing costs or credit card interest rates, and you have never really talked to anyone without a college degree (unless that person does manual labor for you), you are just not going to understand.
Yes. Journalism has a huge class problem, inside and out.
Well no one here is going to like this, but that’s basically the premise of Batya Ungar-Sargon’s book, “Bad News: How Woke Media Is Undermining Democracy”. I think she nailed the issue, others may disagree.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Middle class kids with lots of loans don't become journalists nearly as often as their 1%er peers.
And that impacts the breadth and quality of the journalism, and the ability of papers to serve the public interest. Journalists who grow up in the 1%/Ivy League bubble don't have an understanding of what goes on outside it - which is why there are so many news stories expressing confusion about how bad consumer sentiment is when the stock market and employment rates are so high. When you have never had to worry about your grocery bill or housing costs or credit card interest rates, and you have never really talked to anyone without a college degree (unless that person does manual labor for you), you are just not going to understand.
Yes. Journalism has a huge class problem, inside and out.
Anonymous wrote:Middle class kids with lots of loans don't become journalists nearly as often as their 1%er peers.
And that impacts the breadth and quality of the journalism, and the ability of papers to serve the public interest. Journalists who grow up in the 1%/Ivy League bubble don't have an understanding of what goes on outside it - which is why there are so many news stories expressing confusion about how bad consumer sentiment is when the stock market and employment rates are so high. When you have never had to worry about your grocery bill or housing costs or credit card interest rates, and you have never really talked to anyone without a college degree (unless that person does manual labor for you), you are just not going to understand.
Middle class kids with lots of loans don't become journalists nearly as often as their 1%er peers.
Anonymous wrote:Great, now let's do family income growing up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You mean undergrad matters? Shocking. I was told that there was a college for everyone and that it didn't matter if a kid went to an ivy
Of course the NYT is the only place that employs journalists
And there are only 8 investment banks.
Only 4 consulting firms.
🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
It's not all that different for top consulting firms either:
https://poetsandquants.com/2022/02/22/insider-insights-top-target-schools-for-mbb-consulting-firms/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a former journalist married to a current journalist. Most journalists are not independently wealthy, and most journalists make enough money to live. They're not getting rich, but a journalist with 20 years of experience at a major newspaper is making far more than a teacher with 20 years of experience.
Also, it doesn't surprise me that the NYT has a lot of Ivy Leaguers. Ivies all have highly regarded daily newspapers that give students a lot of great experience, and there are also strong alumni networks at papers like the NYT.
I'm a current journalist married to a current journalist (both at publications you've heard of) with a clarification: A journalist with 20 years experience who has moved into editor ranks or management is making more than a teacher with 20 years of a experience. An experienced rank-and-file reporter still cranking out copy daily does not make more than teachers in this area. Nor do they have a pension.
The industry has been absolutely devastated by private equity. As someone noted above, journalism has become a profession for those with family money. This doesn't mean they can't be great journalists (hello, Ronan Farrow), but you need another means of support these days.
+1 I went to one of those Ivies mentioned in the article as a common feeder to the NY Times. I got a job offer from the NY Times after undergrad and turned it down for something more lucrative as I had large student loans at the time, but I always loved journalism and the NY Times and even 2 decades later, it's my big career regret and I wonder what path my career might have been... Middle class kids with lots of loans don't become journalists nearly as often as their 1%er peers.