Anonymous wrote:Poli sci PhDs take courses in areas of American government and other areas. JDs, as part of their training, take courses where they learn very much the same material in depth, which convinces me that they are similarly qualified (Constitutional Law for example).
The JD is also a research degree, albeit a different type of research (legal research). Furthermore practice in public speaking, debating, and experience with the Socratic method provide good tools for effective teaching.
Are you writing with ChatGPT?
1. PoliSci is not the study of civics. You might take a class on U.S. government in the course of your degree, but you will take more classes on philosophers, statistics, European and Asian political history, the UN, etc.
2. The JD is not a research degree: learning how to look up case law is not original research, it's a professional skill. Also, the JD is not a terminal degree in law because you can get an SJD.
3. And no, studying law does not make you an effective teacher: witness all the terrible teachers in law school.
- Lawyer with an undergrad major in PoliSci. I read a lot of Plato and Kafka for my PoliSci classes, and zero U.S. civics.