Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If multiple sources have confirmed you are not the problem, then you do not have to change your work style. The difficult colleague’s preferences should not be more important than your own freedom to communicate as you wish.
With that said, if there is a simple fix you can do to accommodate this person and it will make life easier for you, go for it. I have some colleagues I am more social with and others I am more direct with, since over time I notice that it gets me better results to harmonize with their work style.
Thanks for your reply! Very helpful. The reason he called me dramatic isn’t because I talk to him too much or whatever. It’s because he wants minimal changes to his work that I review. So I accommodated that because I decided to focus on other teams and projects and don’t want to deal with his issues again.
Wait. That is different than the number of exclamation points and pleasantries. You need to be able to address issues with the work product.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If multiple sources have confirmed you are not the problem, then you do not have to change your work style. The difficult colleague’s preferences should not be more important than your own freedom to communicate as you wish.
With that said, if there is a simple fix you can do to accommodate this person and it will make life easier for you, go for it. I have some colleagues I am more social with and others I am more direct with, since over time I notice that it gets me better results to harmonize with their work style.
Thanks for your reply! Very helpful. The reason he called me dramatic isn’t because I talk to him too much or whatever. It’s because he wants minimal changes to his work that I review. So I accommodated that because I decided to focus on other teams and projects and don’t want to deal with his issues again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I mean, seems like you're behaving professionally now? Being concise and not using exclamation points is neither petty nor dignified
I was always professional with him and everyone else. My point is that my style of engaging with him has changed. I just don't want to be as courteous as I used to be. And now I'm wondering if that's petty since it's signaling to him that my attitude toward him has changed.
Anonymous wrote:If multiple sources have confirmed you are not the problem, then you do not have to change your work style. The difficult colleague’s preferences should not be more important than your own freedom to communicate as you wish.
With that said, if there is a simple fix you can do to accommodate this person and it will make life easier for you, go for it. I have some colleagues I am more social with and others I am more direct with, since over time I notice that it gets me better results to harmonize with their work style.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I mean, seems like you're behaving professionally now? Being concise and not using exclamation points is neither petty nor dignified
I was always professional with him and everyone else. My point is that my style of engaging with him has changed. I just don't want to be as courteous as I used to be. And now I'm wondering if that's petty since it's signaling to him that my attitude toward him has changed.
I can see why he thinks you're dramatic
Anonymous wrote:People will talk behind your back. Your direct report should not have passed along his comment to you. It's not that big of a deal. I would forget it now and be yourself.
. Sounds like you would have challenged him to a duel in another time period. "You have offended my honor, sir."Anonymous wrote:Your idea of being "courteous" may have been his idea of you being "dramatic."
This is amazing, and not in a good way, [quote]I escalated the issue to his supervisor and I said that I do not want this said again about me
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Your idea of being "courteous" may have been his idea of you being "dramatic."
This is amazing, and not in a good way,. Sounds like you would have challenged him to a duel in another time period. "You have offended my honor, sir."I escalated the issue to his supervisor and I said that I do not want this said again about me
English is not my first language. I said it was unacceptable to be called dramatic in the workplace and for him to say he doesn't want to work with me. That's what I told his supervisor. I don't see what's wrong with that.
I think people are being unfair to you.
Why can someone call a coworker "dramatic" -- no less behind their back? Not to say that dramatic people don't exist. But if it's getting in the way of productivity some direct and actionable feedback would be appropriate. Otherwise it just seems like a critique of someone's personality. He's probably emotionally stunted.