The issues are still there and quietly pushing independents and younger people away from the Democratic Party. We are just sitting back and watching the Democratic Party get eaten by the hate monster it has been nurturing for years… it’s terrible but it is not surprising at all.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Much bigger issue is the classroom-clearing kids protected by LRE. But we aren’t allowed to complain about them.

Say what now?
This is a new.

Not if you have anything to do with education.

Brats who scream and rip stuff off the walls, throw books and desks, and so on. Their rights (in the Least Restrictive Environment) are apparently more important than the normal 99% other kids, who are forced to accept this trauma because kindness and diversity.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, OP. These issues are still a problem.
With all the crises happening under Biden, there is only so much time in a day to address them.....

Agree. These issues are still with us and are driving people like me to vote.

I was a dedicated Republican voter but it’s issues like these that have made me #walkaway from the Republican Party.

Anonymous wrote:Oh, OP. These issues are still a problem.
With all the crises happening under Biden, there is only so much time in a day to address them.....

Agree. These issues are still with us and are driving people like me to vote.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Much bigger issue is the classroom-clearing kids protected by LRE. But we aren’t allowed to complain about them.

Say what now?
This is a new.

What’s lre?

Anonymous wrote:Funny, these issues just seemed to poof, disappear. I thought they were existential crisis. Guess Fox/OAN/ Newsmax lost their hysteria writers. Oh, and let’s not forget HUNTER!

wHy dO yoU pErSIst in writing like this? It's juvenile.

Anonymous wrote:Much bigger issue is the classroom-clearing kids protected by LRE. But we aren’t allowed to complain about them.

Say what now?
This is a new.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those issues haven’t gone anywhere. Maybe branch out in terms of your media sources?

Branch into more brain dead propaganda like has been posted in this thread?

If you aren’t aware of, for example, the red states suing to block the new Title IX rule because of trans issues then yes, you need new media sources.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The problem can’t have gone anywhere since Trump and the GOP blocked the bill.

They just don’t want anyone to remember that they blocked the bill, because if a problem is soooooo important, surely more work on it is better?

Trump just didn’t want the Democrats to get a win.

Nah. The bill sucked and would not have solved most of the issues that Biden has created.
He is not enforcing the laws we currently have on the books. Why should we believe he would enforce additional laws?

That was a GOP bill. What are you talking about. If it wouldn't help Biden, why did Trump want to kill it????

Because it was a bad bill. And, it wasn't a "GOP" bill. Sinema and Sens. James Lankford, R-Okla., and Chris Murphy, D-Conn., were the prime authors of the legislation. Senator Lankford and other Republicans conceded way too much to Democrats.
And, it wasn't just Trump that didn't want it. Many Senators and Congress members spoke out against it before Trump did.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The problem can’t have gone anywhere since Trump and the GOP blocked the bill.

They just don’t want anyone to remember that they blocked the bill, because if a problem is soooooo important, surely more work on it is better?

Trump just didn’t want the Democrats to get a win.

Nah. The bill sucked and would not have solved most of the issues that Biden has created.
He is not enforcing the laws we currently have on the books. Why should we believe he would enforce additional laws?

That was a GOP bill. What are you talking about. If it wouldn't help Biden, why did Trump want to kill it????

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still a problem, OP.

If they got away, sounds like CPB needs more tools and manpower. Why did the GOP opposed that in rejecting the bipartisan bill?

We all know that any additional officers hired would be used to process more migrants coming in because this administration does not like the optics of masses of people entering. They aren't concerned with border security - they are concerned with optics.

Do you… do you not know how this works? They have to be processed before they can be returned.

It’s like you guys don’t get anything at all.

That is not what this administration does. They process. Then release them into the country. Our country.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still a problem, OP.

If they got away, sounds like CPB needs more tools and manpower. Why did the GOP opposed that in rejecting the bipartisan bill?

We all know that any additional officers hired would be used to process more migrants coming in because this administration does not like the optics of masses of people entering. They aren't concerned with border security - they are concerned with optics.

Do you… do you not know how this works? They have to be processed before they can be returned.

It’s like you guys don’t get anything at all.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still a problem, OP.

If they got away, sounds like CPB needs more tools and manpower. Why did the GOP opposed that in rejecting the bipartisan bill?

We all know that any additional officers hired would be used to process more migrants coming in because this administration does not like the optics of masses of people entering. They aren't concerned with border security - they are concerned with optics.

Optics - that is precisely why Trump encouraged his allies to reject the bipartisan border bill - he didn't want Biden to get credit for any border legislation. That bill was spearheaded by James Lankford, one of the most conservative members of the Senate.

+1
It was essentially the GOP’s dream bill that in 2021 they didn’t get from Democratic opposition. They got what they wanted and… crapped in the bathtub for Trump.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still a problem, OP.

If they got away, sounds like CPB needs more tools and manpower. Why did the GOP opposed that in rejecting the bipartisan bill?

We all know that any additional officers hired would be used to process more migrants coming in because this administration does not like the optics of masses of people entering. They aren't concerned with border security - they are concerned with optics.

Optics - that is precisely why Trump encouraged his allies to reject the bipartisan border bill - he didn't want Biden to get credit for any border legislation. That bill was spearheaded by James Lankford, one of the most conservative members of the Senate.

Much bigger issue is the classroom-clearing kids protected by LRE. But we aren’t allowed to complain about them.