Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The fact that he was charged with assault with intent to kill shows that DC doesn't take crime seriously.
Well, your friend isn't dead, so what do you think this person should be charged with?
Maybe you should go to law school and when you understand enough about mens rea come back and type at us.
Attempted murder.
-Lawyer
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The fact that he was charged with assault with intent to kill shows that DC doesn't take crime seriously.
Well, your friend isn't dead, so what do you think this person should be charged with?
Maybe you should go to law school and when you understand enough about mens rea come back and type at us.
Attempted murder.
-Lawyer
Is that even a separate offense in DC? Not a lawyer, but my brief read of an MPD training manual is that you can charge "attempt of" for any felony, but the generic penalty for that crime is less than the specific offense of "assault with intent to kill," which carries up to 15 years. I don't think there is a separately identified "attempted murder" statute.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The fact that he was charged with assault with intent to kill shows that DC doesn't take crime seriously.
Well, your friend isn't dead, so what do you think this person should be charged with?
Maybe you should go to law school and when you understand enough about mens rea come back and type at us.
Attempted murder.
-Lawyer
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The fact that he was charged with assault with intent to kill shows that DC doesn't take crime seriously.
Well, your friend isn't dead, so what do you think this person should be charged with?
Maybe you should go to law school and when you understand enough about mens rea come back and type at us.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The fact that he was charged with assault with intent to kill shows that DC doesn't take crime seriously.
Well, your friend isn't dead, so what do you think this person should be charged with?
Maybe you should go to law school and when you understand enough about mens rea come back and type at us.
Anonymous wrote:Horrible.
Stop the violence.
Gun safety now
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The fact that he was charged with assault with intent to kill shows that DC doesn't take crime seriously.
Well, your friend isn't dead, so what do you think this person should be charged with?
Maybe you should go to law school and when you understand enough about mens rea come back and type at us.
DP. Please shut up. Hoping you will consider because I said “please.”
DP: Why?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The fact that he was charged with assault with intent to kill shows that DC doesn't take crime seriously.
Well, your friend isn't dead, so what do you think this person should be charged with?
Maybe you should go to law school and when you understand enough about mens rea come back and type at us.
DP. Please shut up. Hoping you will consider because I said “please.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The fact that he was charged with assault with intent to kill shows that DC doesn't take crime seriously.
Well, your friend isn't dead, so what do you think this person should be charged with?
Maybe you should go to law school and when you understand enough about mens rea come back and type at us.
Anonymous wrote:The fact that he was charged with assault with intent to kill shows that DC doesn't take crime seriously.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Horrible.
Stop the violence.
Gun safety now
![]()
How about putting repeat offenders in prison first ?
Anonymous wrote:Horrible.
Stop the violence.
Gun safety now
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m so sorry to hear about your friend OP and encourage you to post a Go Fund Me if one is started.
She's super embarrassed and doesn't want anyone to know, so I don't want to violate her privacy like that, but appreciate the sentiment.