Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:we are another happy family at ATS and so grateful we got in.
two kids are currently there. one of them was an above average reader going into the school. since he is so advanced he has been given the same amount of work but at a bit more advanced level. his teachers have also gone above and beyond in providing extra stuff for him too for over the summer and during the week if it's needed.
our other child that attends ATS is very much average in all subjects and has also had a positive experience.
I just don't understand why they don't do this at all of the schools.
Me too!
The model requires parent and teacher buy-in to be successful and not everyone wants that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:we are another happy family at ATS and so grateful we got in.
two kids are currently there. one of them was an above average reader going into the school. since he is so advanced he has been given the same amount of work but at a bit more advanced level. his teachers have also gone above and beyond in providing extra stuff for him too for over the summer and during the week if it's needed.
our other child that attends ATS is very much average in all subjects and has also had a positive experience.
I just don't understand why they don't do this at all of the schools.
Me too!
Anonymous wrote:We are on the waitlist for K. Started off mid thirties and now down to the teens. Do you think we have a shot
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:we are another happy family at ATS and so grateful we got in.
two kids are currently there. one of them was an above average reader going into the school. since he is so advanced he has been given the same amount of work but at a bit more advanced level. his teachers have also gone above and beyond in providing extra stuff for him too for over the summer and during the week if it's needed.
our other child that attends ATS is very much average in all subjects and has also had a positive experience.
I just don't understand why they don't do this at all of the schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why don't they make a second ATS if there's so much demand for it?
I don’t understand it. Parents love ATS, the kids do well there, and there is parent demand! Why wouldn’t they have more schools be like ATS.
We don’t have space for more elementary schools period. They won’t convert a neighborhood school
Then why not convert Tuckahoe/Jamestown/one of the ones with overlapping walk zones? Give all existing tuckahoe kids preference (or they could get rezoned but then make the rest of the seats countywide like ats. Within a few years, you’d have another countywide ats and I bet the neighborhood wouldn’t fight it as much.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why don't they make a second ATS if there's so much demand for it?
I don’t understand it. Parents love ATS, the kids do well there, and there is parent demand! Why wouldn’t they have more schools be like ATS.
We don’t have space for more elementary schools period. They won’t convert a neighborhood school
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why don't they make a second ATS if there's so much demand for it?
I don’t understand it. Parents love ATS, the kids do well there, and there is parent demand! Why wouldn’t they have more schools be like ATS.
We don’t have space for more elementary schools period. They won’t convert a neighborhood school
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why don't they make a second ATS if there's so much demand for it?
I don’t understand it. Parents love ATS, the kids do well there, and there is parent demand! Why wouldn’t they have more schools be like ATS.
Anonymous wrote:Why don't they make a second ATS if there's so much demand for it?
Anonymous wrote:Why don't they make a second ATS if there's so much demand for it?
Anonymous wrote:Why don't they make a second ATS if there's so much demand for it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. The lowest lottery number I’ve ever heard getting in for k was 12.
But we’ve already moved up 20 spots so what do you know[/quote
WHy so mean? My kid was 138 on my first try.
Anonymous wrote:No. The lowest lottery number I’ve ever heard getting in for k was 12.