Anonymous wrote:In "School Days for Students," it says you need a minimum of 43 days in each term, with a minimum of 180 and a max of 185 for the year. It also says the last day of each term needs to be a record day, and the spreadsheet seems to count record days as part of the "School Days for Students." Is that right?
Anonymous wrote:Let’s have the PD a week before school starts and a week after it ends. PD is ridiculous
Anonymous wrote:Way too many PD days in DCPS - minimum of 10. That's the source of the problems with the calendar.
Shave that down to six total PD days (2 of which used to combine with 0.5 record keeping days four times per year) and everyone gets out of school a week earlier in June.
How many PD days do teachers really want? 10 feels like overkill. If I had to do 10 PD days per year at my job I would go nuts.
Anonymous wrote:Should we all rally together to make a DCUM-approved calendar? If a bunch of us submit the same calendar, it will likely have an outsized influence on the results.
Personally? My big rock issues are:
-Bring back February full week holiday
-Last day of school on a Friday
-Move up spring break by a week or two, its so damn late with Emancipation Day.
Next year has lots of random 4 day weekends for no discernable reason other than because they messed with the traditional February holiday week. It's really hard to get any care or coverage for random 4-day weekends. We do much better with just a full week in February - lots of commercial camp/childcare options filled the void.
Anonymous wrote:Now I get why they are seeking feedback - Labor Day is not until September 7 in 2026. People will go nuts if school doesn't start until Aug 31.
Other option is kids have two full weeks of school before Labor Day. I'm OK with that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well this new way is a great non example of equity that DCPS goes on and on about. Don’t have a computer? Too bad. Can’t figure out excel? Too bad. Who outside highly educated people are going to mess with this? Definitely not the engagement DCPS claimed to care so much about.
This is not the only way to provide feedback on the calendar. It is simply a new way to do it, in addition to the way it's always been done, which is that they will put out a proposed calendar and there will be a period for comments/feedback before they finalize. You can still provide comments/feedback during the review period.
But now ALSO if you are so convinced you can put together a calendar that works, go ahead and do it. The number of people who do this will be quite small, not for equity reasons, but because the vast majority of people don't actually want to deal with the logistical nightmare that is trying to compose a school year calendar. I also bet that 100% of the calendars that do get submitted will be impossible to implement because they will lack adequate in-service days, PD days, raise major objections from the teachers union, or otherwise have fundamental issues making them unworkable. Even if some submitted schedules meet all those requirements, the people who complain about schedules will also complain about those schedules (there are simply divisions within the district on certain aspects of scheduling, especially the timing, duration, and frequency of breaks).
There is no equity issue here. The people claiming there is one are like Twitter bots and will scream equity about literally everything.
OP here:
Download the Excel template. It forces you to fill it out in such a way that meets requirements for service days (min 180, max 185), requisite PD and record days, PTC days, etc. It's pretty cool. But no way in hell does this meet any of DCPS's equity goals.
I'll post up my completed calendar if anyone else wants to download and submit it to DCPS.
My revised big rock issues:
-Return of February break
-Moving up spring break by a week or two
-Last day of school later in the week (either Thursday or Friday)
Good for you, but I personally hate February break (we cannot afford to take two week long breaks every winter/spring, and it hits too soon after the December break anyway). I like having spring break later as it makes it possible for us to do a warm weather activity without flying somewhere, and won't moving the last day of school to a Thursday/Friday mean that if we have make-up days, we're pushed into the next week anyway (I know not everyone attends makeup days but some of us do).
I expect your calendar will suck.
Yup. And PP’s cluelessness—obviously we’ll all agree, so let’s just make a calendar and all submit it!—shows what DCPS is up against and why this exercise is actually pretty genius.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well this new way is a great non example of equity that DCPS goes on and on about. Don’t have a computer? Too bad. Can’t figure out excel? Too bad. Who outside highly educated people are going to mess with this? Definitely not the engagement DCPS claimed to care so much about.
This is not the only way to provide feedback on the calendar. It is simply a new way to do it, in addition to the way it's always been done, which is that they will put out a proposed calendar and there will be a period for comments/feedback before they finalize. You can still provide comments/feedback during the review period.
But now ALSO if you are so convinced you can put together a calendar that works, go ahead and do it. The number of people who do this will be quite small, not for equity reasons, but because the vast majority of people don't actually want to deal with the logistical nightmare that is trying to compose a school year calendar. I also bet that 100% of the calendars that do get submitted will be impossible to implement because they will lack adequate in-service days, PD days, raise major objections from the teachers union, or otherwise have fundamental issues making them unworkable. Even if some submitted schedules meet all those requirements, the people who complain about schedules will also complain about those schedules (there are simply divisions within the district on certain aspects of scheduling, especially the timing, duration, and frequency of breaks).
There is no equity issue here. The people claiming there is one are like Twitter bots and will scream equity about literally everything.
OP here:
Download the Excel template. It forces you to fill it out in such a way that meets requirements for service days (min 180, max 185), requisite PD and record days, PTC days, etc. It's pretty cool. But no way in hell does this meet any of DCPS's equity goals.
I'll post up my completed calendar if anyone else wants to download and submit it to DCPS.
My revised big rock issues:
-Return of February break
-Moving up spring break by a week or two
-Last day of school later in the week (either Thursday or Friday)
Good for you, but I personally hate February break (we cannot afford to take two week long breaks every winter/spring, and it hits too soon after the December break anyway). I like having spring break later as it makes it possible for us to do a warm weather activity without flying somewhere, and won't moving the last day of school to a Thursday/Friday mean that if we have make-up days, we're pushed into the next week anyway (I know not everyone attends makeup days but some of us do).
I expect your calendar will suck.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well this new way is a great non example of equity that DCPS goes on and on about. Don’t have a computer? Too bad. Can’t figure out excel? Too bad. Who outside highly educated people are going to mess with this? Definitely not the engagement DCPS claimed to care so much about.
This is not the only way to provide feedback on the calendar. It is simply a new way to do it, in addition to the way it's always been done, which is that they will put out a proposed calendar and there will be a period for comments/feedback before they finalize. You can still provide comments/feedback during the review period.
But now ALSO if you are so convinced you can put together a calendar that works, go ahead and do it. The number of people who do this will be quite small, not for equity reasons, but because the vast majority of people don't actually want to deal with the logistical nightmare that is trying to compose a school year calendar. I also bet that 100% of the calendars that do get submitted will be impossible to implement because they will lack adequate in-service days, PD days, raise major objections from the teachers union, or otherwise have fundamental issues making them unworkable. Even if some submitted schedules meet all those requirements, the people who complain about schedules will also complain about those schedules (there are simply divisions within the district on certain aspects of scheduling, especially the timing, duration, and frequency of breaks).
There is no equity issue here. The people claiming there is one are like Twitter bots and will scream equity about literally everything.
OP here:
Download the Excel template. It forces you to fill it out in such a way that meets requirements for service days (min 180, max 185), requisite PD and record days, PTC days, etc. It's pretty cool. But no way in hell does this meet any of DCPS's equity goals.
I'll post up my completed calendar if anyone else wants to download and submit it to DCPS.
My revised big rock issues:
-Return of February break
-Moving up spring break by a week or two
-Last day of school later in the week (either Thursday or Friday)