Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I went to a small school and regret it. It was good for the first two years and then felt very confining.
Oh come on. Just bc you go to a 30K-40K or whatever sized school does not mean that a small one is "confining." You don't interact with all those students but tend to congregate within a smaller subset or group anyway (or a couple of groups). I went to a school with >20K students and, even then, by the end of 4 years I was ready to move on. That's natural for a school of any size.
Anonymous wrote:Fit is the most important. Some like smaller and some like larger
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I went to a small school and regret it. It was good for the first two years and then felt very confining.
Oh come on. Just bc you go to a 30K-40K or whatever sized school does not mean that a small one is "confining." You don't interact with all those students but tend to congregate within a smaller subset or group anyway (or a couple of groups). I went to a school with >20K students and, even then, by the end of 4 years I was ready to move on. That's natural for a school of any size.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At a SLAC, half of your class will be in recruited sports and basically only socialize with their team — so it can feel WAY smaller than advertised.
You throw this around like its gospel. At many smaller schools, "half" your class are definitively NOT recruited athletes. Frankly, if you are that good in a sport (with the time commitment needed to practice and compete) AND still meet the rigorous academic requirements needed to be at a very competitive college which does not offer athletic scholarship, more power to you.
Anonymous wrote:I went to a small school and regret it. It was good for the first two years and then felt very confining.
Anonymous wrote:At a SLAC, half of your class will be in recruited sports and basically only socialize with their team — so it can feel WAY smaller than advertised.
Anonymous wrote:Yes. Finalists were Princeton, Amherst, Duke. Wish I'd chosen Amherst. Kid is going to a NESCAC and I'm living vicariously.
Anonymous wrote:I went to a small school and regret it. It was good for the first two years and then felt very confining.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Depends what she most wants out of college. If she wants to pursue a PhD, I’d pick the small school. If she’s most excited by speakers, events, pomp, variety, then the big one.
That would likely be a mistake. https://www.highereddatastories.com/2023/10/undergraduate-institutions-of-doctoral.html. Bigger schools do just fine proficient PHDs.
Anonymous wrote:Depends what she most wants out of college. If she wants to pursue a PhD, I’d pick the small school. If she’s most excited by speakers, events, pomp, variety, then the big one.
Anonymous wrote:My DD at T10 and quite happy. Specifically, she really likes the range of activities, classes, and social opportunities that comes with a school of some size. She said she likes that when she walks across campus, she’ll always be likely to see someone when she recognized, but she’s always meeting new people as well. What I hear over and over from parents of kids making these kinds of choices is that the transition to the small LAC can be easier than the larger school, the small nurturing environment can be comforting for an 18-year-old away from home, but by the time they hit junior year or so it can be sort of, claustrophobic. (Probably why so many kids go abroad for some or all of junior year) so it’s a situation where your kid has to know themselves.