Anonymous wrote:My buyers agent did more harm than good. Literally every decision she recommended worked out to my disadvantage. I would have been MUCH better off paying a lawyer to represent me.
Anonymous wrote:The good thing is that realtors are dumb, which is why they are realtors to begin with. They openly discuss their contemplated illegal conduct in response to NAR settlement on social media. And you can only imagine the texts flying back and forth about it on a more granular level. Buyers agents who steer away from sellers now unwilling to be shaken down and listing agents colluding with buyer's agents to shakedown sellers are going to get sued. And that is a beautiful thing. Just to force these unethical, petulant and delusional agents to spend money on lawyers is worth it. I personally wont hesitate to sue these clowns if they steer from my listing in fall. There is no participant in this economy that gets paid more for doing less than the realtor.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:im waiting until fall to sell in NW bc of NAR settlement.
I spoke to a realtor who said nothing is really going to change. If you don’t offer a commission to the buyers realtor then people will pass over your house like agents push them to pass over fsbo. You’ll pay the commission anyway either way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:im waiting until fall to sell in NW bc of NAR settlement.
I spoke to a realtor who said nothing is really going to change. If you don’t offer a commission to the buyers realtor then people will pass over your house like agents push them to pass over fsbo. You’ll pay the commission anyway either way.
Nonsense. Then they will get sued. Also, you, the seller, can get caught up in that litigation. The world has changed for the lazy realtors - sorry!
Multiple realtors are pushing this. They are phrasing it as the seller would put themselves at a disadvantage if they don’t offer compensation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:im waiting until fall to sell in NW bc of NAR settlement.
I spoke to a realtor who said nothing is really going to change. If you don’t offer a commission to the buyers realtor then people will pass over your house like agents push them to pass over fsbo. You’ll pay the commission anyway either way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My buyers agent did more harm than good. Literally every decision she recommended worked out to my disadvantage. I would have been MUCH better off paying a lawyer to represent me.
+1 This was our experience too. There's really no role for them. But we just checked the boxes to submit our own offers or the sellers agent did it for us. Then the settlement attorney does the rest once a contract is ratified.
What role does the real estate attorney have in reviewing the standard form and asking you which boxes to check?
Anonymous wrote:My buyers agent did more harm than good. Literally every decision she recommended worked out to my disadvantage. I would have been MUCH better off paying a lawyer to represent me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:im waiting until fall to sell in NW bc of NAR settlement.
I spoke to a realtor who said nothing is really going to change. If you don’t offer a commission to the buyers realtor then people will pass over your house like agents push them to pass over fsbo. You’ll pay the commission anyway either way.
Nonsense. Then they will get sued. Also, you, the seller, can get caught up in that litigation. The world has changed for the lazy realtors - sorry!
Sued- on what grounds?