Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DD is on three waitlists with three schools. One is the clear top choice. She indicated to all of the schools that they are her top choice and will enroll if offered. If she gets into choice #2 before choice #1, we’ll take it. And then if she gets into #1 later, we’ll forfeit the deposit to #2.
If she told #2 she will enroll if offered, she needs to enroll and decline the other WL spots. What you're suggesting is different and unethical.
Who anointed you the ethics police? There is nothing unethical about this approach. School #2 gets my deposit AND gets to fill their spot with another kid on the waitlist.
She told school #2 she would enroll and accepted their offer (extended because she said she would enroll) while she fully intended to go w/ school number whatever. That is absolutely unethical.
Completely disagree.
How is lying ethical? If you tell someone you will enroll if they admit you, then they admit you and you hold out for another offer, that's not really ethical. How has truth become so arbitrary?
As I said previously, I think it's fine to tell all WL schools you will enroll if they admit because chances of any admitting are slim, and only 1 will offer at a time. But, then if one offers, you take it and withdraw the others if you want to be ethical. And telling all they are #1 wouldn't be true, so I wouldn't do that. Just because playing the schools by lying suits you best doesn't make it ethical.
Anonymous wrote:I thought WL worked like ED - if you accept- you have to get off others.
Maybe I’m wrong ?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DD is on three waitlists with three schools. One is the clear top choice. She indicated to all of the schools that they are her top choice and will enroll if offered. If she gets into choice #2 before choice #1, we’ll take it. And then if she gets into #1 later, we’ll forfeit the deposit to #2.
If she told #2 she will enroll if offered, she needs to enroll and decline the other WL spots. What you're suggesting is different and unethical.
Who anointed you the ethics police? There is nothing unethical about this approach. School #2 gets my deposit AND gets to fill their spot with another kid on the waitlist.
She told school #2 she would enroll and accepted their offer (extended because she said she would enroll) while she fully intended to go w/ school number whatever. That is absolutely unethical.
Completely disagree.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do they call you or do they send an email once you get off the waitlist?
email -- make your kid check email religiously for the fast turn around some school have.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC is on 3/4 waitlists at the moment. Would be happy to take any one of them over the option in hand. Can one signal commitment to join to the multiple schools on the WL? Or should that only be communicated to one school on the WL?
Yes, also signal the student is withdrawing any FA application, willing to come full pay. This usually gets their attention.
I think you are really overestimating the power of full pay. My kids and literally every one of their friends are full pay at any school. It isn’t really the hook you think it is!
Anonymous wrote:Do they call you or do they send an email once you get off the waitlist?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DD is on three waitlists with three schools. One is the clear top choice. She indicated to all of the schools that they are her top choice and will enroll if offered. If she gets into choice #2 before choice #1, we’ll take it. And then if she gets into #1 later, we’ll forfeit the deposit to #2.
If she told #2 she will enroll if offered, she needs to enroll and decline the other WL spots. What you're suggesting is different and unethical.
Who anointed you the ethics police? There is nothing unethical about this approach. School #2 gets my deposit AND gets to fill their spot with another kid on the waitlist.
She told school #2 she would enroll and accepted their offer (extended because she said she would enroll) while she fully intended to go w/ school number whatever. That is absolutely unethical.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DD is on three waitlists with three schools. One is the clear top choice. She indicated to all of the schools that they are her top choice and will enroll if offered. If she gets into choice #2 before choice #1, we’ll take it. And then if she gets into #1 later, we’ll forfeit the deposit to #2.
If she told #2 she will enroll if offered, she needs to enroll and decline the other WL spots. What you're suggesting is different and unethical.
Who anointed you the ethics police? There is nothing unethical about this approach. School #2 gets my deposit AND gets to fill their spot with another kid on the waitlist.
Anonymous wrote:Tell all the schools they are your #1. Accepting to go on a waitlist does NOT make you unethical. The PP ^^ should get off her high horse. Good luck OP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DD is on three waitlists with three schools. One is the clear top choice. She indicated to all of the schools that they are her top choice and will enroll if offered. If she gets into choice #2 before choice #1, we’ll take it. And then if she gets into #1 later, we’ll forfeit the deposit to #2.
If she told #2 she will enroll if offered, she needs to enroll and decline the other WL spots. What you're suggesting is different and unethical.
Anonymous wrote:I think OP is asking if they can tell all the schools that if student is offered a spot off the waitlist they will take it, or if they should only say that to one school, presumably their first choice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tell all the schools they are your #1. Accepting to go on a waitlist does NOT make you unethical. The PP ^^ should get off her high horse. Good luck OP.
NP. Being on multiple waitlists does not make you unethical. Telling (lying to) multiple schools that they are your #1 and you’ll enroll if they offer you a spot, even though you intend to renege if you get a better offer, is in fact unethical.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DD is on three waitlists with three schools. One is the clear top choice. She indicated to all of the schools that they are her top choice and will enroll if offered. If she gets into choice #2 before choice #1, we’ll take it. And then if she gets into #1 later, we’ll forfeit the deposit to #2.
If she told #2 she will enroll if offered, she needs to enroll and decline the other WL spots. What you're suggesting is different and unethical.
Anonymous wrote:I think OP is asking if they can tell all the schools that if student is offered a spot off the waitlist they will take it[b], or if they should only say that to one school, presumably their first choice.