Anonymous wrote:My lawn too. It's green but mostly weeds. We keep it neat. The bees love it. I plant native plants for them and the butterflies. Seems healthier than chemicals.
Anonymous wrote:We badly neglected our lawn for about 5 years. I didn’t water it, I didn’t fertilize it, and mostly didn’t apply weed killer. Also I stopped using one of those lawn chemical spray services about the same time.
Our financial situation has improved now and I want to invest in our lawn (to be good neighbor in this community, and also just to have a nicer lawn to be on).
1. Start lawn service NOW (spraying etc.) in the spring? Or will this kill the weeds while not helping the actual grass grow more.
2. Start in the Fall with aeration and overseeding, then do the lawn services after that.
3. Roughly how many years before a visible improvement?
Please advise.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hate our yard service neighbors spaying their toxic chemicals everywhere. Next you’ll be in the “why are cancer rates skyrocketing among young people?” threads in the health forums.
Who said the chemicals, as applied, are toxic to humans? Look into the chemicals involved in growing our food supply. Chemicals in shampoo. Clothes started off as chemicals. Well your opinion of your neighbor doesn't matter to your neighbor so oh well.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3267855/
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(15)70134-8/abstract (Glyphosate/Roundup is the #1 most commonly used herbicide in the world)
From https://vet.purdue.edu/wcorc/documents/CanineUrinaryBladderCancer.pdf
"A significantly increased risk of TCC was found for dogs exposed to lawns or gardens treated with herbicides and insecticides or herbicides alone. In fact, dogs exposed to treated lawns were seven times more likely to develop TCC. "
It's only a matter of time before we find conclusively that spraying potential carcinogens on our lawns has adverse effects on our health.
A "matter of time"--means eventuality what I want to be true will be because I have good vibes about it
If you read the links, you'd see that there is significant correlation between the use of lawn chemicals, and cancer. Because cancer is multi-factorial, it's difficult to establish causation, which is why I said 'a matter of time'. With time, there will be more data linking the two, not less.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hate our yard service neighbors spaying their toxic chemicals everywhere. Next you’ll be in the “why are cancer rates skyrocketing among young people?” threads in the health forums.
Who said the chemicals, as applied, are toxic to humans? Look into the chemicals involved in growing our food supply. Chemicals in shampoo. Clothes started off as chemicals. Well your opinion of your neighbor doesn't matter to your neighbor so oh well.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3267855/
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(15)70134-8/abstract (Glyphosate/Roundup is the #1 most commonly used herbicide in the world)
From https://vet.purdue.edu/wcorc/documents/CanineUrinaryBladderCancer.pdf
"A significantly increased risk of TCC was found for dogs exposed to lawns or gardens treated with herbicides and insecticides or herbicides alone. In fact, dogs exposed to treated lawns were seven times more likely to develop TCC. "
It's only a matter of time before we find conclusively that spraying potential carcinogens on our lawns has adverse effects on our health.
A "matter of time"--means eventuality what I want to be true will be because I have good vibes about it
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hate our yard service neighbors spaying their toxic chemicals everywhere. Next you’ll be in the “why are cancer rates skyrocketing among young people?” threads in the health forums.
Who said the chemicals, as applied, are toxic to humans? Look into the chemicals involved in growing our food supply. Chemicals in shampoo. Clothes started off as chemicals. Well your opinion of your neighbor doesn't matter to your neighbor so oh well.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3267855/
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(15)70134-8/abstract (Glyphosate/Roundup is the #1 most commonly used herbicide in the world)
From https://vet.purdue.edu/wcorc/documents/CanineUrinaryBladderCancer.pdf
"A significantly increased risk of TCC was found for dogs exposed to lawns or gardens treated with herbicides and insecticides or herbicides alone. In fact, dogs exposed to treated lawns were seven times more likely to develop TCC. "
It's only a matter of time before we find conclusively that spraying potential carcinogens on our lawns has adverse effects on our health.
Anonymous wrote:Rid yourself of the mindset that native plants are "weeds". I love my neighbor's lawn with native violets and dandelions - for some reason, I don't have as many. I do have clover that attracts bunnies at dusk: they have a standing dinner date in my front yard in late spring.
All you need to do is mow regularly. Your neighbors won't thank you for spraying carcinogens and hormone disruptors on your property.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hate our yard service neighbors spaying their toxic chemicals everywhere. Next you’ll be in the “why are cancer rates skyrocketing among young people?” threads in the health forums.
Who said the chemicals, as applied, are toxic to humans? Look into the chemicals involved in growing our food supply. Chemicals in shampoo. Clothes started off as chemicals. Well your opinion of your neighbor doesn't matter to your neighbor so oh well.
Anonymous wrote:I just mow the weeds and call it lawn. I never feed or weed anything and I never have to water! It works fine.
Anonymous wrote:I hate our yard service neighbors spaying their toxic chemicals everywhere. Next you’ll be in the “why are cancer rates skyrocketing among young people?” threads in the health forums.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pull up the lawn. Invest native grasses and groundcovers (some are nice and have similar effect to lawns like carex pennsylvanica) and enjoy a chemical free space.
No. See how easy that is? No is a full sentence. So, what power do you have to negate my "no"?