Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hello, my 2nd grader was rejected from AAP with the following stats:
WISC 137
Hope: 4 always, 6 almost always, 1 often. exceptional in science, math, reading, writing, social sciences. Long paragraph about strengths.
How should we approach the appeals process?
WISC is high, but not overwhelmingly so. HOPE score is biassed from a non-FFX County teacher perspective. This is a borderline low case IMO. I don't see much of a case for appeal, since there is little comparison. Sounds like a high performing general ed student, who might get in future years. If you're set to come to public, I'd advocate for a non-center if you can and pressure the principal/AART to get into Local IV, or at least math push-ins.
You’re crazy. A 137 wisc is not a borderline/low case.
Lol - welcome to Northern Virginia craziness and DCUM AAP Forum. In here; you're the crazy one who thinks a low 99% score by itself is a shoo-in for anything.
I have two kids in AAP in a high SES center school. I never said 137 was a shoo-in for anything, I said 137 WISC is not borderline. I’m well aware that it’s a holistic process now but that score is not the problem and certainly not on the low/borderline side for WISC scores.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hello, my 2nd grader was rejected from AAP with the following stats:
WISC 137
Hope: 4 always, 6 almost always, 1 often. exceptional in science, math, reading, writing, social sciences. Long paragraph about strengths.
How should we approach the appeals process?
WISC is high, but not overwhelmingly so. HOPE score is biassed from a non-FFX County teacher perspective. This is a borderline low case IMO. I don't see much of a case for appeal, since there is little comparison. Sounds like a high performing general ed student, who might get in future years. If you're set to come to public, I'd advocate for a non-center if you can and pressure the principal/AART to get into Local IV, or at least math push-ins.
You’re crazy. A 137 wisc is not a borderline/low case.
I think that's a sarcasm.
Lol - welcome to Northern Virginia craziness and DCUM AAP Forum. In here; you're the crazy one who thinks a low 99% score by itself is a shoo-in for anything.
I have two kids in AAP in a high SES center school. I never said 137 was a shoo-in for anything, I said 137 WISC is not borderline. I’m well aware that it’s a holistic process now but that score is not the problem and certainly not on the low/borderline side for WISC scores.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hello, my 2nd grader was rejected from AAP with the following stats:
WISC 137
Hope: 4 always, 6 almost always, 1 often. exceptional in science, math, reading, writing, social sciences. Long paragraph about strengths.
How should we approach the appeals process?
WISC is high, but not overwhelmingly so. HOPE score is biassed from a non-FFX County teacher perspective. This is a borderline low case IMO. I don't see much of a case for appeal, since there is little comparison. Sounds like a high performing general ed student, who might get in future years. If you're set to come to public, I'd advocate for a non-center if you can and pressure the principal/AART to get into Local IV, or at least math push-ins.
You’re crazy. A 137 wisc is not a borderline/low case.
Lol - welcome to Northern Virginia craziness and DCUM AAP Forum. In here; you're the crazy one who thinks a low 99% score by itself is a shoo-in for anything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hello, my 2nd grader was rejected from AAP with the following stats:
WISC 137
Hope: 4 always, 6 almost always, 1 often. exceptional in science, math, reading, writing, social sciences. Long paragraph about strengths.
How should we approach the appeals process?
WISC is high, but not overwhelmingly so. HOPE score is biassed from a non-FFX County teacher perspective. This is a borderline low case IMO. I don't see much of a case for appeal, since there is little comparison. Sounds like a high performing general ed student, who might get in future years. If you're set to come to public, I'd advocate for a non-center if you can and pressure the principal/AART to get into Local IV, or at least math push-ins.
You’re crazy. A 137 wisc is not a borderline/low case.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The WISC is fine. A 137 is well into the 99th percentile.
If your child has no achievement test scores from their private, then I'd opt for those at GMU rather than CogAT/NNAT. You may need to show that your kid is working above grade level in math and language arts.
I'd mostly focus on the parent writeup and the work samples for the appeal.
A kid with a 137 WISC belongs in AAP. This is all so ridiculous.
Anonymous wrote:Hello, my 2nd grader was rejected from AAP with the following stats:
WISC 137
Hope: 4 always, 6 almost always, 1 often. exceptional in science, math, reading, writing, social sciences. Long paragraph about strengths.
How should we approach the appeals process?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hello, my 2nd grader was rejected from AAP with the following stats:
WISC 137
Hope: 4 always, 6 almost always, 1 often. exceptional in science, math, reading, writing, social sciences. Long paragraph about strengths.
How should we approach the appeals process?
WISC is high, but not overwhelmingly so. HOPE score is biassed from a non-FFX County teacher perspective. This is a borderline low case IMO. I don't see much of a case for appeal, since there is little comparison. Sounds like a high performing general ed student, who might get in future years. If you're set to come to public, I'd advocate for a non-center if you can and pressure the principal/AART to get into Local IV, or at least math push-ins.
You’re crazy. A 137 wisc is not a borderline/low case.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hello, my 2nd grader was rejected from AAP with the following stats:
WISC 137
Hope: 4 always, 6 almost always, 1 often. exceptional in science, math, reading, writing, social sciences. Long paragraph about strengths.
How should we approach the appeals process?
WISC is high, but not overwhelmingly so. HOPE score is biassed from a non-FFX County teacher perspective. This is a borderline low case IMO. I don't see much of a case for appeal, since there is little comparison. Sounds like a high performing general ed student, who might get in future years. If you're set to come to public, I'd advocate for a non-center if you can and pressure the principal/AART to get into Local IV, or at least math push-ins.
Anonymous wrote:The WISC is fine. A 137 is well into the 99th percentile.
If your child has no achievement test scores from their private, then I'd opt for those at GMU rather than CogAT/NNAT. You may need to show that your kid is working above grade level in math and language arts.
I'd mostly focus on the parent writeup and the work samples for the appeal.