Anonymous wrote:Our DINK neighbors have two Range Rovers. And they recently upgraded to a larger model after having a smaller model for less than a year. I'm assuming they lease, because they go through cars like candy.
It's utterly absurd to see a single person driving a Range Rover.
Anonymous wrote:Douchemobiles.
Anonymous wrote:Way more Audis than RRs/LRs in this area.
Anonymous wrote:I don't understand them. They ride so rough and they're always in the shop.
), you get to put mileage on their loaner SUV.Anonymous wrote:I assume that every Range / Land Rover owner is a Republican.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because they don’t know jack about cars, other than to pay guys lot of money to fix them, if they’re dumb enough to keep them past warranty.
They really are awful vehicles. Land Rover/Range Rover hasn’t made a decent vehicle in this century.
This. It was my dream car when I was young, DH gifted one to me and we spent easily 4,000 every time it was in the repair shop. New engine, etc. The service engine light was always on, always. So thankful to get rid of it (sold it to a nice man from Florida who loved the model and knew of its' difficulties but liked tinkering with the engines) and we will NEVER purchase a Land Rover/Range Rover again. Never. Consider it one of our worst financial decisions.
Anonymous wrote:New land rovers are problem ridden but back in the day, they were easier to fix, very versatile and were used by the border patrols in difficult areas and even in winter conditions, United Nations peacekeepers, etc.
DC has lots of snobs and politically correct folk, and Land Rover is the perfect car for folks who are loaded yet don't want to be like everyone else of such means and driving commonplace bimmers and benzes.