Anonymous wrote:Enraging. I live on H Street in NE and have watched shop after shop like this open up on the blocks between my kids' school (Ludlow-Taylor) and another elementary (JO Wilson). I've also watched these streets fill with people who are clearly on drugs, often drinking out of open containers, panhandling, engaging in lewd and sometimes graphic language and behavior. Smoking so much that if you have to walk through with your kid, you're walking through these clouds of smoke. My kids complain about the stinky cigarettes and the crowds on the street. And these places are within a block or two of TWO elementary schools, with hundreds of kids coming and going every day.
I don't care if Congress claims they can't do anything about it. Do something about it, and then make Congress defend their position. This is ridiculous. These people are not even engaging in legal commerce or behavior. The head shops are skirting the law by "gifting" weed with purchase, and the people who patronize them are flouting the fact that the police won't enforce laws against public use (or public drinking, urinating and defecating in public spaces, harassment of pedestrians, etc.). And the Council just decided to do NOTHING.
At least Allen brought the bill. I don't support the recall effort against him (as in won't vote for it and think it's kind of silly) BUT I do sense it might be lighting a fire under him to be more proactive about crime and drug issues in Ward 6 and I'm all for that. The complacency is killing us.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I give up. We are moving. Just hope this mentality doesn't affect the whole of America and there are still some pockets of sanity to escape to.
You should not be allowed to leave the shithole you created by voting for leftist scum.
+1.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I give up. We are moving. Just hope this mentality doesn't affect the whole of America and there are still some pockets of sanity to escape to.
You should not be allowed to leave the shithole you created by voting for leftist scum.
Anonymous wrote:I give up. We are moving. Just hope this mentality doesn't affect the whole of America and there are still some pockets of sanity to escape to.
Anonymous wrote:Enraging. I live on H Street in NE and have watched shop after shop like this open up on the blocks between my kids' school (Ludlow-Taylor) and another elementary (JO Wilson). I've also watched these streets fill with people who are clearly on drugs, often drinking out of open containers, panhandling, engaging in lewd and sometimes graphic language and behavior. Smoking so much that if you have to walk through with your kid, you're walking through these clouds of smoke. My kids complain about the stinky cigarettes and the crowds on the street. And these places are within a block or two of TWO elementary schools, with hundreds of kids coming and going every day.
I don't care if Congress claims they can't do anything about it. Do something about it, and then make Congress defend their position. This is ridiculous. These people are not even engaging in legal commerce or behavior. The head shops are skirting the law by "gifting" weed with purchase, and the people who patronize them are flouting the fact that the police won't enforce laws against public use (or public drinking, urinating and defecating in public spaces, harassment of pedestrians, etc.). And the Council just decided to do NOTHING.
At least Allen brought the bill. I don't support the recall effort against him (as in won't vote for it and think it's kind of silly) BUT I do sense it might be lighting a fire under him to be more proactive about crime and drug issues in Ward 6 and I'm all for that. The complacency is killing us.
Anonymous wrote:Can someone please explain how the meeting ended - I listened to the entire hearing and then it seemed to end so abruptly. They were voting on something and then suddenly it was over. My understanding is that they have 75 days to make a decision? If you listen to the VERY last few seconds of the video - after almost everyone left the meeting, you can hear the woman lawyer and someone else cheering...it sounded like they said, "Did we just make history?" Can anyone explain this?
Anonymous wrote:The Council didn’t want to change the rules part way through the process. And the Board can only deny based on the existing legislation which doesn’t appear to provide them grounds to deny. Even though the applicant agrees that he wouldn’t want a dispensary across the street from his kids school, but he didn’t realize there was a school next to the location he chose and he just chose it because it was available. The whole process is broken.