Anonymous wrote:She can get another dog. Not like they are endangered or anything. I say this as a dog owner too.
Anonymous wrote:I really think if you have a delivery coming and your dog is loose where they are doing the delivery, this is your fault as the owner whether the dog is aggressive or not. You have to secure your dog. Unless he climbed over a fence or something to get to the dog, this is her fault.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well the insta cart shopper has been fired. So the dog owner has her "justice".
He should sue for unlawful termination. All he did was defend himself in a dangerous situation. If the authorities found no cause to press charges, there is no justification for terminating him.
Pretty sure they’re not allowed to carry guns while working
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well the insta cart shopper has been fired. So the dog owner has her "justice".
He should sue for unlawful termination. All he did was defend himself in a dangerous situation. If the authorities found no cause to press charges, there is no justification for terminating him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well the insta cart shopper has been fired. So the dog owner has her "justice".
He should sue for unlawful termination. All he did was defend himself in a dangerous situation. If the authorities found no cause to press charges, there is no justification for terminating him.
He was not legally authorized to work for Instacart, took on (bought, stole?) another person's account. People do this to bypass background checks because they would not qualify otherwise. The biggest takeaway from this story is these delivery drivers are actually not vetted and not safe. Get your own food!
This a whole thing right now on UberEsts/Doordash/InstaCart. Venezuelan migrants are doing these jobs under the accounts of legal residents. The legal resident/citizen takes a cut of the migrants earnings. There’s even a whole ecosystem of people renting out scooters by the day so these migrants can use them to make deliveries. It’s wild.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well the insta cart shopper has been fired. So the dog owner has her "justice".
He should sue for unlawful termination. All he did was defend himself in a dangerous situation. If the authorities found no cause to press charges, there is no justification for terminating him.
He was not legally authorized to work for Instacart, took on (bought, stole?) another person's account. People do this to bypass background checks because they would not qualify otherwise. The biggest takeaway from this story is these delivery drivers are actually not vetted and not safe. Get your own food!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well the insta cart shopper has been fired. So the dog owner has her "justice".
He should sue for unlawful termination. All he did was defend himself in a dangerous situation. If the authorities found no cause to press charges, there is no justification for terminating him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well the insta cart shopper has been fired. So the dog owner has her "justice".
He should sue for unlawful termination. All he did was defend himself in a dangerous situation. If the authorities found no cause to press charges, there is no justification for terminating him.
He was not legally authorized to work for Instacart, took on (bought, stole?) another person's account. People do this to bypass background checks because they would not qualify otherwise. The biggest takeaway from this story is these delivery drivers are actually not vetted and not safe. Get your own food!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well the insta cart shopper has been fired. So the dog owner has her "justice".
He should sue for unlawful termination. All he did was defend himself in a dangerous situation. If the authorities found no cause to press charges, there is no justification for terminating him.
Anonymous wrote:Well the insta cart shopper has been fired. So the dog owner has her "justice".