Anonymous wrote:My DH says this and hates his job. Why do you think people say this because they like their job? Maybe they fear they will never save enough or maybe realize they do not have enough to retire? 1%ers have more than $10M saved for retirement. (It may be $5M.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What does this mean? I understand liking to work, but at some point you aren’t going to be as productive or efficient right?
Speak for yourself.
There are people who get well into their 80s or even older who remain more "productive" and "efficient" than the average person.
No they don't. I work in a field that's similar to the PP who talked about academia. We have tons of very elderly people - late 70s, 80s, and even mid 90s - who literally refuse to retire. It is not because of the money; some of them work FT even though we no longer have funding for their roles.
I genuinely respect the expertise of older people - I'm in my mid50s myself, and I now appreciate how clueless I was in the first decade of my career - but no one who is 75 or older is more productive or efficient. Most of them are recycling knowledge that they acquired decades ago and/or relying on armies of assistants. Time to step back and make room.
Yep, you're right. People like Dr Fauci and RBG didn't have much to contribute. Their work would have been better left to an inexperienced 20 year old. (This is sarcasm btw).
There is a world of difference between someone like Dianne Feinstein being propped up like Weekend at Bernie's and someone in their 70s who is still sharp. They were clearly referring to the former.
That said, if we're bringing up RBG, while she was nowhere near Feinstein's level, she absolutely should have retired.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I won’t ever be able to afford to retire. So I will work until I drop dead. If I can’t work for longer than about a year and a half, then I will have to kill myself.
I factor this into my plan. I don't want to depend on my family or leave them in financial ruin. This is actually more valuable to me than my life.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What does this mean? I understand liking to work, but at some point you aren’t going to be as productive or efficient right?
Speak for yourself.
There are people who get well into their 80s or even older who remain more "productive" and "efficient" than the average person.
No they don't. I work in a field that's similar to the PP who talked about academia. We have tons of very elderly people - late 70s, 80s, and even mid 90s - who literally refuse to retire. It is not because of the money; some of them work FT even though we no longer have funding for their roles.
I genuinely respect the expertise of older people - I'm in my mid50s myself, and I now appreciate how clueless I was in the first decade of my career - but no one who is 75 or older is more productive or efficient. Most of them are recycling knowledge that they acquired decades ago and/or relying on armies of assistants. Time to step back and make room.
Yep, you're right. People like Dr Fauci and RBG didn't have much to contribute. Their work would have been better left to an inexperienced 20 year old. (This is sarcasm btw).
There is a world of difference between someone like Dianne Feinstein being propped up like Weekend at Bernie's and someone in their 70s who is still sharp. They were clearly referring to the former.
That said, if we're bringing up RBG, while she was nowhere near Feinstein's level, she absolutely should have retired.
Anonymous wrote:I will never be able to afford to retire.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What does this mean? I understand liking to work, but at some point you aren’t going to be as productive or efficient right?
Speak for yourself.
There are people who get well into their 80s or even older who remain more "productive" and "efficient" than the average person.
No they don't. I work in a field that's similar to the PP who talked about academia. We have tons of very elderly people - late 70s, 80s, and even mid 90s - who literally refuse to retire. It is not because of the money; some of them work FT even though we no longer have funding for their roles.
I genuinely respect the expertise of older people - I'm in my mid50s myself, and I now appreciate how clueless I was in the first decade of my career - but no one who is 75 or older is more productive or efficient. Most of them are recycling knowledge that they acquired decades ago and/or relying on armies of assistants. Time to step back and make room.
Yep, you're right. People like Dr Fauci and RBG didn't have much to contribute. Their work would have been better left to an inexperienced 20 year old. (This is sarcasm btw).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What does this mean? I understand liking to work, but at some point you aren’t going to be as productive or efficient right?
Speak for yourself.
There are people who get well into their 80s or even older who remain more "productive" and "efficient" than the average person.
No they don't. I work in a field that's similar to the PP who talked about academia. We have tons of very elderly people - late 70s, 80s, and even mid 90s - who literally refuse to retire. It is not because of the money; some of them work FT even though we no longer have funding for their roles.
I genuinely respect the expertise of older people - I'm in my mid50s myself, and I now appreciate how clueless I was in the first decade of my career - but no one who is 75 or older is more productive or efficient. Most of them are recycling knowledge that they acquired decades ago and/or relying on armies of assistants. Time to step back and make room.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I won’t ever be able to afford to retire. So I will work until I drop dead. If I can’t work for longer than about a year and a half, then I will have to kill myself.
I factor this into my plan. I don't want to depend on my family or leave them in financial ruin. This is actually more valuable to me than my life.
Anonymous wrote:My MIL is like this. She works part-time now in a remote admin job. She worked this job FT, then it went remote for Covid and my in-laws moved out of state and they were fine with her continuing part time. It is a fairly easy job which helps. She also nearly died before Covid and could have retired after and we have no idea why she didn't. She's 70 now and every year it is "oh maybe next year". She has hobbies, they enjoy traveling, they don't need the money. I think it is just a security thing.
Anonymous wrote:I won’t ever be able to afford to retire. So I will work until I drop dead. If I can’t work for longer than about a year and a half, then I will have to kill myself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What does this mean? I understand liking to work, but at some point you aren’t going to be as productive or efficient right?
Speak for yourself.
There are people who get well into their 80s or even older who remain more "productive" and "efficient" than the average person.
Anonymous wrote:Financial
And when Republicans win you think you have enough to retire. LOL
And if you think prices are high now what do you think those CEO's are going to do when all restraints are off big business? Biden didn't raise prices CEO's did. And gee guess who supports them GOP darlings.
Americans are stupid.