Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think it's possible for a club to have the same level of coach, in effectiveness and experience, for every team in their club. Choices have to be made in the assignments. And often the coaches themselves choose what clubs and teams they lead. An experienced and effective coach will want to coach the top level teams.
You mean the coach who wants to win for ego and ladder climbing sake wants to coach the top level team.
Oh. I haven't seen that in a technical director's bio, but I'm sure you're right. You're definitely sure you're right.
Right. Yes. It's a job.
Development of players as a Youth Coach isn't a job/career?
Sure it is. One that includes the desire to move up, or as you called it, ladder climbing. How do you think coaches should be measured? What sorts of promotions should they look for? Technical director, maybe? What do they point to to get those jobs? What sorts of metrics would they use to get a raise?
In real youth coaching, you show you can take the bad-news-bears and make them into better players/team
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think it's possible for a club to have the same level of coach, in effectiveness and experience, for every team in their club. Choices have to be made in the assignments. And often the coaches themselves choose what clubs and teams they lead. An experienced and effective coach will want to coach the top level teams.
You mean the coach who wants to win for ego and ladder climbing sake wants to coach the top level team.
Right. Yes. It's a job.
Development of players as a Youth Coach isn't a job/career?
Sure it is. One that includes the desire to move up, or as you called it, ladder climbing. How do you think coaches should be measured? What sorts of promotions should they look for? Technical director, maybe? What do they point to to get those jobs? What sorts of metrics would they use to get a raise?
Anonymous wrote:If one was to choose between FVU vs SYC 2nd team or ASA 2nd team at U13.
FVU - ECNL National
SYC/ASA - National Academy League
Any thoughts?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think it's possible for a club to have the same level of coach, in effectiveness and experience, for every team in their club. Choices have to be made in the assignments. And often the coaches themselves choose what clubs and teams they lead. An experienced and effective coach will want to coach the top level teams.
You mean the coach who wants to win for ego and ladder climbing sake wants to coach the top level team.
Right. Yes. It's a job.
Development of players as a Youth Coach isn't a job/career?
Anonymous wrote:If one was to choose between FVU vs SYC 2nd team or ASA 2nd team at U13.
FVU - ECNL National
SYC/ASA - National Academy League
Any thoughts?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think it's possible for a club to have the same level of coach, in effectiveness and experience, for every team in their club. Choices have to be made in the assignments. And often the coaches themselves choose what clubs and teams they lead. An experienced and effective coach will want to coach the top level teams.
You mean the coach who wants to win for ego and ladder climbing sake wants to coach the top level team.
Right. Yes. It's a job.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FVU. Avoid Alexandria’s second teams at l cost.
Why?
Because they are treated like second class citizens. They don’t practice with the top team, get the bad coaches, don’t play up- it is the worst I have ever seen. And Alexandria players who are on the top team stay there for eternity so even when others are better- they never lose their top team spot.
Why would coaches/clubs not want their top team to have the best players from their available pool?
That's irrational and illogical from every angle.
They must be the only coaches/club without egos.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think it's possible for a club to have the same level of coach, in effectiveness and experience, for every team in their club. Choices have to be made in the assignments. And often the coaches themselves choose what clubs and teams they lead. An experienced and effective coach will want to coach the top level teams.
You mean the coach who wants to win for ego and ladder climbing sake wants to coach the top level team.
Anonymous wrote:I don't think it's possible for a club to have the same level of coach, in effectiveness and experience, for every team in their club. Choices have to be made in the assignments. And often the coaches themselves choose what clubs and teams they lead. An experienced and effective coach will want to coach the top level teams.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:hmmm. I don't know anything specific to this age group, but it isn't totally true of the age groups I'm familiar with. MLSN allows 4 players, or maybe even more, to be designated as "futures" so they can be dual rostered. They play and train with the first and second team, but I think train mostly with the top team. In our age group they regularly play matches with the MLS Next team, but there's a cap on how many. I know at least one kid was permanently rostered with the top team after starting as a "future.". My son's team also regularly scrimmages with the second team on days when practices overlap. Would you expect them to train together always? Shouldn't the club put their best coaches on the highest level teams?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FVU. Avoid Alexandria’s second teams at l cost.
Why?
Because they are treated like second class citizens. They don’t practice with the top team, get the bad coaches, don’t play up- it is the worst I have ever seen. And Alexandria players who are on the top team stay there for eternity so even when others are better- they never lose their top team spot.
No!
The best coaches should be with the kids who need the most development
Interesting. I don't think the club owes more development to the kids who aren't at the top level. The top level kids need to continue to develop and play against higher level competition. It's up to those kids to raise their level not the clubs responsibility to try to develop every player to the top team.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:hmmm. I don't know anything specific to this age group, but it isn't totally true of the age groups I'm familiar with. MLSN allows 4 players, or maybe even more, to be designated as "futures" so they can be dual rostered. They play and train with the first and second team, but I think train mostly with the top team. In our age group they regularly play matches with the MLS Next team, but there's a cap on how many. I know at least one kid was permanently rostered with the top team after starting as a "future.". My son's team also regularly scrimmages with the second team on days when practices overlap. Would you expect them to train together always? Shouldn't the club put their best coaches on the highest level teams?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FVU. Avoid Alexandria’s second teams at l cost.
Why?
Because they are treated like second class citizens. They don’t practice with the top team, get the bad coaches, don’t play up- it is the worst I have ever seen. And Alexandria players who are on the top team stay there for eternity so even when others are better- they never lose their top team spot.
No!
The best coaches should be with the kids who need the most development
Anonymous wrote:hmmm. I don't know anything specific to this age group, but it isn't totally true of the age groups I'm familiar with. MLSN allows 4 players, or maybe even more, to be designated as "futures" so they can be dual rostered. They play and train with the first and second team, but I think train mostly with the top team. In our age group they regularly play matches with the MLS Next team, but there's a cap on how many. I know at least one kid was permanently rostered with the top team after starting as a "future.". My son's team also regularly scrimmages with the second team on days when practices overlap. Would you expect them to train together always? Shouldn't the club put their best coaches on the highest level teams?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FVU. Avoid Alexandria’s second teams at l cost.
Why?
Because they are treated like second class citizens. They don’t practice with the top team, get the bad coaches, don’t play up- it is the worst I have ever seen. And Alexandria players who are on the top team stay there for eternity so even when others are better- they never lose their top team spot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FVU. Avoid Alexandria’s second teams at l cost.
Why?
Because they are treated like second class citizens. They don’t practice with the top team, get the bad coaches, don’t play up- it is the worst I have ever seen. And Alexandria players who are on the top team stay there for eternity so even when others are better- they never lose their top team spot.