Anonymous wrote:It's a SLAC with single sex dorms.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Worcester is starting to re-gentrify and I think people have started to look at it harder since BC has gotten so hard to get into. It used to be a very highly respected school but seemed to decline in popularity over the past couple of decades. I'm glad to see it coming back.
This. I think, also, that the 30-40% acceptance rate was a big draw. It was so obviously off.
FWIW, we considered it a low target for my daughter (who did get into BC and other reach-for-everyone schools), and she was waitlisted at HC.
FFS this is called yield protection
Isn’t “yield protection” actually lack of demonstrated interest. Lots of colleges prioritize how much the applicant demonstrates that they WANT to attend there. For a number of reasons. Cohesive, vibrant student body with school spirit for example. Casting it as “yield protection” makes the colleges’ motives sound more sinister when it’s really that the applicant appeared to the college to just throw the application in along with a dozen others. Colleges don’t, nor should they, admit only on GPA and test scores.
In the workplace analogy, I’m hiring the 3.4 GPA grad from UMD who actively networked and sought out my company over the 3.8 GPA from JHU who submitted a resume through career services and not much else.
Anonymous wrote:probably due to it being a questbridge partner school
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Worcester is starting to re-gentrify and I think people have started to look at it harder since BC has gotten so hard to get into. It used to be a very highly respected school but seemed to decline in popularity over the past couple of decades. I'm glad to see it coming back.
This. I think, also, that the 30-40% acceptance rate was a big draw. It was so obviously off.
FWIW, we considered it a low target for my daughter (who did get into BC and other reach-for-everyone schools), and she was waitlisted at HC.
FFS this is called yield protection
Isn’t “yield protection” actually lack of demonstrated interest. Lots of colleges prioritize how much the applicant demonstrates that they WANT to attend there. For a number of reasons. Cohesive, vibrant student body with school spirit for example. Casting it as “yield protection” makes the colleges’ motives sound more sinister when it’s really that the applicant appeared to the college to just throw the application in along with a dozen others. Colleges don’t, nor should they, admit only on GPA and test scores.
In the workplace analogy, I’m hiring the 3.4 GPA grad from UMD who actively networked and sought out my company over the 3.8 GPA from JHU who submitted a resume through career services and not much else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Worcester is starting to re-gentrify and I think people have started to look at it harder since BC has gotten so hard to get into. It used to be a very highly respected school but seemed to decline in popularity over the past couple of decades. I'm glad to see it coming back.
This. I think, also, that the 30-40% acceptance rate was a big draw. It was so obviously off.
FWIW, we considered it a low target for my daughter (who did get into BC and other reach-for-everyone schools), and she was waitlisted at HC.
FFS this is called yield protection
Isn’t “yield protection” actually lack of demonstrated interest. Lots of colleges prioritize how much the applicant demonstrates that they WANT to attend there. For a number of reasons. Cohesive, vibrant student body with school spirit for example. Casting it as “yield protection” makes the colleges’ motives sound more sinister when it’s really that the applicant appeared to the college to just throw the application in along with a dozen others. Colleges don’t, nor should they, admit only on GPA and test scores.
In the workplace analogy, I’m hiring the 3.4 GPA grad from UMD who actively networked and sought out my company over the 3.8 GPA from JHU who submitted a resume through career services and not much else.
Anonymous wrote:All the Boston area schools are seeing the same phenomenon. Tufts, BC, NEU, BU, WPI all have seen their acceptance rates plummet over the past 5 years.
Anonymous wrote:It's a SLAC with single sex dorms.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Worcester is starting to re-gentrify and I think people have started to look at it harder since BC has gotten so hard to get into. It used to be a very highly respected school but seemed to decline in popularity over the past couple of decades. I'm glad to see it coming back.
This. I think, also, that the 30-40% acceptance rate was a big draw. It was so obviously off.
FWIW, we considered it a low target for my daughter (who did get into BC and other reach-for-everyone schools), and she was waitlisted at HC.
FFS this is called yield protection
Anonymous wrote:Discouraging to see this! My DD has it on her list as a target but all the dropping acceptance rates make it even harder to figure out what is a target.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Worcester is starting to re-gentrify
We were there last summer and it was still awful.
Anonymous wrote:Discouraging to see this! My DD has it on her list as a target but all the dropping acceptance rates make it even harder to figure out what is a target.
Anonymous wrote:Worcester is starting to re-gentrify