Anonymous wrote:The current ESESES program at Magruder is not a locked wing. It’s mainly dealing with high anxiety issues. It is a somewhat quiet part of the building. Source- I work in the building nearby the program.
The program has a very good reputation and the students seem to have positive relationships with staff.
I think previous poster is referring to the older alt program that used to be at Magruder around 15 years ago but is now replaced by the ESESES program.
Anonymous wrote:As a former SESES teacher- i would advise steering clear of both programs. My direct experience in SESES indicates that it can often be a dumping ground for students who really need way WAY more mental health supports. I frequently feared significant bodily harm and witnessed some very intense violence and injury.
Regarding bridge, many of my students were articulated into bridge programs. Going into it, I could have told you that there needs would not be met. And indeed, 90% of those students are now in private placements.
Unfortunately, MCP policy is to have students fail up into placements where there needs can be met. Instead of proactive placement.
I have no experience with the ESESES, but from what I have heard from teachers in those programs, it is a very holistic and functional unit. Maybe pursue that?
Anonymous wrote:As a former SESES teacher- i would advise steering clear of both programs. My direct experience in SESES indicates that it can often be a dumping ground for students who really need way WAY more mental health supports. I frequently feared significant bodily harm and witnessed some very intense violence and injury.
Regarding bridge, many of my students were articulated into bridge programs. Going into it, I could have told you that there needs would not be met. And indeed, 90% of those students are now in private placements.
Unfortunately, MCP policy is to have students fail up into placements where there needs can be met. Instead of proactive placement.
I have no experience with the ESESES, but from what I have heard from teachers in those programs, it is a very holistic and functional unit. Maybe pursue that?
Anonymous wrote:For Churchill Bridge, my child was able to do all 7 periods self-contained for 9th grade: 4 core classes (no honors offered), resource, art, PE.
For 10th, I requested he had access to some mainstreamed classes. He is in pe, chemistry, and English mainstreamed, but the other 4 classes are SC.
We are in talks for next year. All this to say that everything is an IEP team decision. You can have access to the higher level classes, but with that you have to give up some of the support and the small classes- which are normally why you’re in the program.
SESES has fewer SC options and the kids generally have fewer social challenges as compared to Bridge kids. I don’t know much about ESESES except that those students have higher needs than both Bridge and SESES.
MOM1970 wrote:Thanks so much for this explanation.
I think I'm missing something - What is the difference between SESES and ESESES?
And Bridge and SESES seem so similar. Why are there two programs?
Dual enrollment works for a lot of people. My older kids didn't do it but some of their friends did and it is interesting that it works for a wide variety of students for significantly different reasons.
MOM1970 wrote:
It depends on what you mean by "set her up for college" College will always be an option. Do you mean Montgomery College or UMD? And there is a whole spectrum in between.
Of course there is a whole spectrum. I've been through this rodeo with older kid so I appreciate the options out there for post secondary education. It means that my kid continues to have access to year 4 and 5 language, higher level math and science courses. AP courses. And she may never go to college (Montgomery or four year) but I don't want a lack of classes to prevent choices.