Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Daily Wire? No thanks.

It's far from a credible news source. They just like twisting facts to suit their agenda.

I think that just because they are the only ones reporting on it doesn't really make it seem more likely. They 100% have an agenda.

Everyone has an agenda. Just because the entity publishing it has an agenda doesn't mean the information is not true.

If what Daily Wire has published is false or libelous, then they should be held accountable. But it doesn't mean that the information in this story isn't true.

MCPS has an agenda and it often says things that are factually true. The two things aren't mutually exclusive.

They have a long history of dishonesty. They aren't a credible news source. There are sources, unlike Fox News et al, who exist simply to communicate news accurately, not push an agenda by distoring the truth.

Daily wire is credible and not on the far right you can see the chart here https://adfontesmedia.com/interactive-media-bias-chart/

Bias: Strong Right
Reliability: Generally Reliable/Analysis OR Other Issues

It's to the right of Fox News on that chart so NOT CREDIBLE.

Political bias is independent of credibility.
In court two lawyers are diametrically opposed in their biased, but are still both held to a standard of credibility.

Having a bias for what new stories they choose to report says nothing about their credibility. Just as your bias against hearing facts you don't like doesn't make your true statements non-credible.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Daily Wire? No thanks.

It's far from a credible news source. They just like twisting facts to suit their agenda.

I think that just because they are the only ones reporting on it doesn't really make it seem more likely. They 100% have an agenda.

Everyone has an agenda. Just because the entity publishing it has an agenda doesn't mean the information is not true.

If what Daily Wire has published is false or libelous, then they should be held accountable. But it doesn't mean that the information in this story isn't true.

MCPS has an agenda and it often says things that are factually true. The two things aren't mutually exclusive.

They have a long history of dishonesty. They aren't a credible news source. There are sources, unlike Fox News et al, who exist simply to communicate news accurately, not push an agenda by distoring the truth.

That's fine. Can you engage with the merits of this specific story though?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Daily Wire? No thanks.

It's far from a credible news source. They just like twisting facts to suit their agenda.

I think that just because they are the only ones reporting on it doesn't really make it seem more likely. They 100% have an agenda.

Everyone has an agenda. Just because the entity publishing it has an agenda doesn't mean the information is not true.

If what Daily Wire has published is false or libelous, then they should be held accountable. But it doesn't mean that the information in this story isn't true.

MCPS has an agenda and it often says things that are factually true. The two things aren't mutually exclusive.

They have a long history of dishonesty. They aren't a credible news source. There are sources, unlike Fox News et al, who exist simply to communicate news accurately, not push an agenda by distoring the truth.

Daily wire is credible and not on the far right you can see the chart here https://adfontesmedia.com/interactive-media-bias-chart/

Bias: Strong Right
Reliability: Generally Reliable/Analysis OR Other Issues

It's to the right of Fox News on that chart so NOT CREDIBLE.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, there are already lawsuits pending against MCPS unfairly punishing teachers who expressed support for Gaza premature babies or Gaza civilians last fall...

...so I'm not surprised that a teacher complaining about antisemitism would also be misunderstood. MCPS employees aren't trained in diplomacy or the delicate art of soothing people's legitimate or less-legitimate sense of outrage. Indeed, maybe MCPS staff should undergo additional training on what to say and what not to say in the workplace!

I have read those lawsuits they will be dismissed. They are garbage same as the ones on the Opt out. These are not intelligent people and they find shit lawyers. All of these lawsuits are on line and can be accessed easily. And it is extremely easy to read them it you have even half a brain.

The teachers were clearly unfairly punished, at a time when sentiment was running high against Hamas, and Israel had just begun to destroy Gaza. I am sure MCPS admin would not react that way today, when it's clear Israel has lost the support of most of its friends in its overreach. More than 30,000 civilians killed in Gaza compared to less than 2000 Israelis killed on Oct 7th.

I don't think the lawsuits were meant to be won - they were meant to leverage some compensation from MCPS. I hope these teachers will get something.

Just like I hope this teacher will get something. Antisemitism is NEVER OK. Jews around the world are victims of Netanyahu's tragic policies in Gaza.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, there are already lawsuits pending against MCPS unfairly punishing teachers who expressed support for Gaza premature babies or Gaza civilians last fall...

...so I'm not surprised that a teacher complaining about antisemitism would also be misunderstood. MCPS employees aren't trained in diplomacy or the delicate art of soothing people's legitimate or less-legitimate sense of outrage. Indeed, maybe MCPS staff should undergo additional training on what to say and what not to say in the workplace!

I have read those lawsuits they will be dismissed. They are garbage same as the ones on the Opt out. These are not intelligent people and they find shit lawyers. All of these lawsuits are on line and can be accessed easily. And it is extremely easy to read them it you have even half a brain.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Daily Wire? No thanks.

I think it’s important to read various news sources, and then make up your opinions based on what you read rather than discount a source in its entirety from the start. Take it with a grain of salt, but be open to what you read. I read this article, with that grain of salt, but it was good information.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Daily Wire? No thanks.

It's far from a credible news source. They just like twisting facts to suit their agenda.

I think that just because they are the only ones reporting on it doesn't really make it seem more likely. They 100% have an agenda.

Everyone has an agenda. Just because the entity publishing it has an agenda doesn't mean the information is not true.

If what Daily Wire has published is false or libelous, then they should be held accountable. But it doesn't mean that the information in this story isn't true.

MCPS has an agenda and it often says things that are factually true. The two things aren't mutually exclusive.

They have a long history of dishonesty. They aren't a credible news source. There are sources, unlike Fox News et al, who exist simply to communicate news accurately, not push an agenda by distoring the truth.

Daily wire is credible and not on the far right you can see the chart here https://adfontesmedia.com/interactive-media-bias-chart/

Bias: Strong Right
Reliability: Generally Reliable/Analysis OR Other Issues

Anonymous wrote:Daily Wire? No thanks.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Daily Wire? No thanks.

It's far from a credible news source. They just like twisting facts to suit their agenda.

I think that just because they are the only ones reporting on it doesn't really make it seem more likely. They 100% have an agenda.

Everyone has an agenda. Just because the entity publishing it has an agenda doesn't mean the information is not true.

If what Daily Wire has published is false or libelous, then they should be held accountable. But it doesn't mean that the information in this story isn't true.

MCPS has an agenda and it often says things that are factually true. The two things aren't mutually exclusive.

They have a long history of dishonesty. They aren't a credible news source. There are sources, unlike Fox News et al, who exist simply to communicate news accurately, not push an agenda by distoring the truth.

Anonymous wrote:Well, there are already lawsuits pending against MCPS unfairly punishing teachers who expressed support for Gaza premature babies or Gaza civilians last fall...

...so I'm not surprised that a teacher complaining about antisemitism would also be misunderstood. MCPS employees aren't trained in diplomacy or the delicate art of soothing people's legitimate or less-legitimate sense of outrage. Indeed, maybe MCPS staff should undergo additional training on what to say and what not to say in the workplace!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Daily Wire? No thanks.

It's far from a credible news source. They just like twisting facts to suit their agenda.

I think that just because they are the only ones reporting on it doesn't really make it seem more likely. They 100% have an agenda.

Everyone has an agenda. Just because the entity publishing it has an agenda doesn't mean the information is not true.

If what Daily Wire has published is false or libelous, then they should be held accountable. But it doesn't mean that the information in this story isn't true.

MCPS has an agenda and it often says things that are factually true. The two things aren't mutually exclusive.

They have a long history of dishonesty. They aren't a credible news source. There are sources, unlike Fox News et al, who exist simply to communicate news accurately, not push an agenda by distoring the truth.