Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain why not just send a text message? Text hold up court, they last forever if you enable it, they have time stamps, you set when it alerts you, shared calendar, etc? Why use an app?
Because it's easier to have everything in one place. A log of all calls between me and him or kid and him, a log of all messages, a record of when bills were paid, a calendar.
Because I can log the kids in and out so they can place and receive phone calls.
Because it keeps all the things I want to share, separate from things I don't want to share.
Because I can give access to the app to my attorney or someone else who is helping me, without it being muddied with other communications.
Because it reduces the time it takes my attorney to organize things and prepare for court, and he charges me by the minute.
Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain why not just send a text message? Text hold up court, they last forever if you enable it, they have time stamps, you set when it alerts you, shared calendar, etc? Why use an app?
Anonymous wrote:I’m just saying it’s ghetto. If you treat someone like garbage (handle them) they will respond in kind. No one likes to be placed in an app for the right to communicate with the parent of their child.
No duh they are not paying
People don’t like to do things that are not voluntary or that seem ridiculously difficult
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Apps make sense in that case. I think if there is any wealth or education it does not make sense in the mid or long term.
Are you implying that people with wealth or education don’t avoid their obligations or abuse their former spouses?
To be clear, if you are mincing the costs of small purchases (eg. a pair of sneakers), then it makes sense to treat the parent abnormally and through an app.
The “resource limited” mindset makes sense and now I understand who uses these apps. Low resource people who divide up small expenses every month
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Apps make sense in that case. I think if there is any wealth or education it does not make sense in the mid or long term.
Are you implying that people with wealth or education don’t avoid their obligations or abuse their former spouses?
To be clear, if you are mincing the costs of small purchases (eg. a pair of sneakers), then it makes sense to treat the parent abnormally and through an app.
The “resource limited” mindset makes sense and now I understand who uses these apps. Low resource people who divide up small expenses every month
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Apps make sense in that case. I think if there is any wealth or education it does not make sense in the mid or long term.
Are you implying that people with wealth or education don’t avoid their obligations or abuse their former spouses?
Anonymous wrote:Apps make sense in that case. I think if there is any wealth or education it does not make sense in the mid or long term.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We use 2houses. It's less expensive than other options. The calendar/custodial schedule, expense sharing, and messages are the most useful features for us.
Oh. We don’t do expense sharing. My former spouse earns a lot more so he just covers everything. I am super nice to him and drive the kids everywhere and spends as much time with his girlfriend as he wants . Works for me ! Maybe if the app does all that - sounds like it has many many features!
My strat is to be an awesome ex wife, better than the wife I was!
Anonymous wrote:We use 2houses. It's less expensive than other options. The calendar/custodial schedule, expense sharing, and messages are the most useful features for us.