Hassling people for not being Catholic is pretty much the opposite of what the Jesuits are about.

My DC is at BC now. Did not go to catholic HS and does not go to mass

Anonymous wrote:No one cares who goes to mass and who does not. Just pointing out that from my small sample there is nothing happening among peers that would make you feel like you don’t belong because of your religion.

If kids going to mass would make your kid feel unwelcome, find another school. You never know what group of kids he will end up with. My DS doesn’t attend mass, but of his four roommates, two were very devout. It didn’t impact his friendship with them at all.

No one cares who goes to mass and who does not. Just pointing out that from my small sample there is nothing happening among peers that would make you feel like you don’t belong because of your religion.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My non-Catholic DC is there and it’s a non- issue. Roomed with 7 Catholics and only one went to mass. You have to apply to join most clubs, but religion is not part of the criteria.

Oh so it is good that kids don’t go to mass? Got it.

The initial question was regarding environment for non-Catholics. Non-Catholics don't go to mass, got it?

Nobody is making your kid go to mass but it seems that you have issue with others going?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ya know, it’s surprising to me how many Mormons there are at BYU. Don’t they realize how that looks? I wonder how “Mormon” people have to be to go there?

You people are ridiculous. My surprise was at how they had manned this particular panel.

I think the point is that they don’t “man” the panel. They schedule the student volunteers (or work study students) according to class schedule and other factors, without regard to race, sex or religion.

I would find it surprising (and not in a good way) if they make no effort to have different perspectives on a panel.

Are you the person who was at the session with the panel?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ya know, it’s surprising to me how many Mormons there are at BYU. Don’t they realize how that looks? I wonder how “Mormon” people have to be to go there?

You people are ridiculous. My surprise was at how they had manned this particular panel.

I think the point is that they don’t “man” the panel. They schedule the student volunteers (or work study students) according to class schedule and other factors, without regard to race, sex or religion.

I would find it surprising (and not in a good way) if they make no effort to have different perspectives on a panel.

People who went to Jesuit high schools can't have "different perspectives"? Huh?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ya know, it’s surprising to me how many Mormons there are at BYU. Don’t they realize how that looks? I wonder how “Mormon” people have to be to go there?

You people are ridiculous. My surprise was at how they had manned this particular panel.

I think the point is that they don’t “man” the panel. They schedule the student volunteers (or work study students) according to class schedule and other factors, without regard to race, sex or religion.

I would find it surprising (and not in a good way) if they make no effort to have different perspectives on a panel.

So they should have gone with “be sure to add a Jew and Muslim”? You’d be happy then?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ya know, it’s surprising to me how many Mormons there are at BYU. Don’t they realize how that looks? I wonder how “Mormon” people have to be to go there?

You people are ridiculous. My surprise was at how they had manned this particular panel.

I think the point is that they don’t “man” the panel. They schedule the student volunteers (or work study students) according to class schedule and other factors, without regard to race, sex or religion.

I would find it surprising (and not in a good way) if they make no effort to have different perspectives on a panel.

Fortunately your kid has other options.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ya know, it’s surprising to me how many Mormons there are at BYU. Don’t they realize how that looks? I wonder how “Mormon” people have to be to go there?

You people are ridiculous. My surprise was at how they had manned this particular panel.

I think the point is that they don’t “man” the panel. They schedule the student volunteers (or work study students) according to class schedule and other factors, without regard to race, sex or religion.

I would find it surprising (and not in a good way) if they make no effort to have different perspectives on a panel.

Notre Dame had 45% of their incoming class coming from public, 36% from Catholic, and 19% from non-Catholic private.

BC had 49% from public, 26% from Catholic/Jesuit, and 25% from non-Catholic private.

Georgetown is
Public: 47%
Jesuit: 7%
Catholic: 11%
Independent: 34%

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ya know, it’s surprising to me how many Mormons there are at BYU. Don’t they realize how that looks? I wonder how “Mormon” people have to be to go there?

You people are ridiculous. My surprise was at how they had manned this particular panel.

I think the point is that they don’t “man” the panel. They schedule the student volunteers (or work study students) according to class schedule and other factors, without regard to race, sex or religion.

NP. BC did feel distinctly more Catholic to us than Georgetown. For some that may be a positive, others a negative. *shrug*

We attended a packed auditorium info session and the AO asked how many kids went to Jesuit high schools and I was surprised DS was the only one, and only a handful attended a Catholic hs.

Anonymous wrote:Ya know, it’s surprising to me how many Mormons there are at BYU. Don’t they realize how that looks? I wonder how “Mormon” people have to be to go there?

You people are ridiculous. My surprise was at how they had manned this particular panel.