Anonymous wrote:At the top 10 colleges, it does not matter. You have genders in pretty much equal numbers applying. At places like CalTech,MIT, slightly more males.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Colleges do not pursue gender diversity. At least the ones larger than 1,000 student enrollments. Men are still discriminated against in STEM fields. Sorry, but not sorry it is true.
Some do. My kid is at a T20 that has far more female applicants but kerps accepted students to 50/50.
How can it be top 20 if they are taking inferior candidates?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Colleges do not pursue gender diversity. At least the ones larger than 1,000 student enrollments. Men are still discriminated against in STEM fields. Sorry, but not sorry it is true.
Some do. My kid is at a T20 that has far more female applicants but kerps accepted students to 50/50.
How can it be top 20 if they are taking inferior candidates?
Anonymous wrote:Colleges do not pursue gender diversity. At least the ones larger than 1,000 student enrollments. Men are still discriminated against in STEM fields. Sorry, but not sorry it is true.
Anonymous wrote:Will take on the second part of the question. Outside of the highly enlightened folks on DCUM no one cares about diversity. People are tribal and want to be with people like themselves.
This is why you will see schools like Wake Forest and others that have tumbled in the USNWR stay the course because they know an ever growing number of students will seek out the traditional college experience over the current trend to have a highly “diversified” campus.
Anonymous wrote:Will take on the second part of the question. Outside of the highly enlightened folks on DCUM no one cares about diversity. People are tribal and want to be with people like themselves.
This is why you will see schools like Wake Forest and others that have tumbled in the USNWR stay the course because they know an ever growing number of students will seek out the traditional college experience over the current trend to have a highly “diversified” campus.
I agree with this part, I do believe people get with their tribe which is why I think have all diversity on campus is important.People are tribal and want to be with people like themselves.
This is why you will see schools like Wake Forest and others that have tumbled in the USNWR stay the course because they know an ever growing number of students will seek out the traditional college experience over the current trend to have a highly “diversified” campus.
Diverse people care. High achieving ones even skip top schools for other schools due to the lack of diversity. When you are the majority you have the luxury to not care but when you are in the minority you care.Outside of the highly enlightened folks on DCUM no one cares about diversity.
Anonymous wrote:At the top 10 colleges, it does not matter. You have genders in pretty much equal numbers applying. At places like CalTech,MIT, slightly more males.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Colleges do not pursue gender diversity. At least the ones larger than 1,000 student enrollments. Men are still discriminated against in STEM fields. Sorry, but not sorry it is true.
Some do. My kid is at a T20 that has far more female applicants but kerps accepted students to 50/50.
How can it be top 20 if they are taking inferior candidates?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It sounds like boys can pretty much clean up.
Maybe at certain LACs. Not at larger state schools that have engineering.
Anonymous wrote:It sounds like boys can pretty much clean up.
Anonymous wrote:A good read on this issue -
Date-onomics: How Dating Became a Lopsided Numbers Game by Jon Birger
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hormones, colleges want a happy student body.
Women are driving out. They outnumber men applying by a large margin.
It has been shown when a university tips above 60-40 female:male ratio---application numbers/yield go down.
Women want men to date on campus.