Anonymous wrote:How old are your kids?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We read the printed newspaper daily. We do not do TV. We listen to the radio, mostly WETA. We have books all over our house and reading books is the main activity here.
“Luddite” is another way to say “a person who is not adept with new technology”. I guess my grandma is a Luddite too.
That is the meaning. I think OP meant a different word.
"What does the word Luddite mean today?
Modern usage
Nowadays, the term "Luddite" often is used to describe someone who is opposed or resistant to new technologies."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We read the printed newspaper daily. We do not do TV. We listen to the radio, mostly WETA. We have books all over our house and reading books is the main activity here.
“Luddite” is another way to say “a person who is not adept with new technology”. I guess my grandma is a Luddite too.
Anonymous wrote:If it were up to me we would not have any tvs in our house. I had a phone for a few years but never used it so I had it turned off. Don't miss it.
I don't like labels. I really don't like people to be honest.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have two kids, 4 and 1. We don’t have a TV and our kids generally don’t interact with screens at all except for FaceTime. One thing I’ve noticed is that the kids are forced to do more helping out when there isn’t a screen option. Like, I remember as a kid watching TV while my mom cooked dinner every night. Our kids can play by themselves while we cook but if they get bored of that the other option is helping us, so my daughter has learned how to do a lot on the kitchen. There’s just more time for other better things to do and more incentive to do them when screens aren’t an easy go-to option.
People like OP and you (and me) will get trashed by other posters who let their kids have free rein of devices so the adults can indulge their own screen addictions. And no, snatching a few min of DCUM while the kids are playing independently or after they go to bed doesn’t make me a hypocrite. When screentime is always an option for kids, they lose their desire to do anything else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why the hell are you spending time posting on this site? You sound like a wannabe Luddite.
HAHA! Good point! Let me virtue signal about how great I am . . . but I'm posting it on this trashy site.
Trashy site yet here you are.
Anonymous wrote:We have two kids, 4 and 1. We don’t have a TV and our kids generally don’t interact with screens at all except for FaceTime. One thing I’ve noticed is that the kids are forced to do more helping out when there isn’t a screen option. Like, I remember as a kid watching TV while my mom cooked dinner every night. Our kids can play by themselves while we cook but if they get bored of that the other option is helping us, so my daughter has learned how to do a lot on the kitchen. There’s just more time for other better things to do and more incentive to do them when screens aren’t an easy go-to option.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why the hell are you spending time posting on this site? You sound like a wannabe Luddite.
HAHA! Good point! Let me virtue signal about how great I am . . . but I'm posting it on this trashy site.
Anonymous wrote:But you’re on DCUM?
Anonymous wrote:Why the hell are you spending time posting on this site? You sound like a wannabe Luddite.