Anonymous wrote:DH sounds like one of those “appearances above all else” people.
Not healthy, imo.
People can be sad. And in public. Your DS experiences a “public humiliation” (?!) and you & DH expect him to put on a fake face & say, “oh hi Mr & Mrs X, how lovely to see you!”
He didn’t punch anyone or a wall, he was humiliated or sad & walked by without returning a superficial greeting. If the kind family witnessed the public humiliation, I think they should not be trying to force him into small talk.
This is so weird, if he was upset & everyone witnessed it, why can’t we let him be upset? He needs to pretend to be fine?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:13 or 18? Younger =3 as teens get older it would be -3.
Though again, could be situational. Are they upset because they were rooting for the 49ers or they are upset because they didn’t make the cut for their sports team in high school.
16, something personal and publicly humiliating.
Then 3 for sure
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is your relationship to the teen? If you knew they were really upset, you shouldn't have attempted to engage them at all, unless you are close enough to try to offer comfort (bit still not take offense if they don't want your comfort).
It's my ds. I personally agree with you that I would not have engaged, or understood if I did and the kid didn't respond, but to be clear, that family is lovely and they absolutely meant to be kind. My dh meanwhile is PISSED at ds, says there is no excuse and that he is absolutely mortified. He read ds the riot act after we got home, which to me was not a good idea as ds is already dealing with the humiliating thing that happened. I think telling him he needs to apologize when he sees them is enough. DH is basically saying we raised ds to be insanely rude, that he is so ashamed of him.
Gee, where did your kid learn to be volatile?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is your relationship to the teen? If you knew they were really upset, you shouldn't have attempted to engage them at all, unless you are close enough to try to offer comfort (bit still not take offense if they don't want your comfort).
It's my ds. I personally agree with you that I would not have engaged, or understood if I did and the kid didn't respond, but to be clear, that family is lovely and they absolutely meant to be kind. My dh meanwhile is PISSED at ds, says there is no excuse and that he is absolutely mortified. He read ds the riot act after we got home, which to me was not a good idea as ds is already dealing with the humiliating thing that happened. I think telling him he needs to apologize when he sees them is enough. DH is basically saying we raised ds to be insanely rude, that he is so ashamed of him.
Anonymous wrote:What is your relationship to the teen? If you knew they were really upset, you shouldn't have attempted to engage them at all, unless you are close enough to try to offer comfort (bit still not take offense if they don't want your comfort).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:13 or 18? Younger =3 as teens get older it would be -3.
Though again, could be situational. Are they upset because they were rooting for the 49ers or they are upset because they didn’t make the cut for their sports team in high school.
16, something personal and publicly humiliating.