Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This seems like a typical request you’d use an agency for.

Is it? OK, that is helpful to know if true. Just seems like most things I read are about people going to agencies to either have the surrogate help them create a baby, or have them work with IVF places to get pregnant (i.e., continue to go through IVF process). We literally only have one embryo to transfer and that is it -- no more IVF, etc. In any event, helpful to know, thanks.

As for the peanut gallery, reading about people taking issue surrogacy on here is one of the more bizarre things I see. I get the problems with forced surrogacy overseas, but I can't for the life of me see how someone could take issue with someone want to help someone else start a family when they are unable to for health reasons. But obviously many must like to troll and/or watch the world burn. It is at least good entertainment reading the responses, so I appreciate that part of it.

You can’t see the issue of commoditizing babies? You seriously don’t see the ethics issue with that? Are you that obtuse?
Watch the world burn? What are you talking about? Are you medicating?

OK, got for it. I will give you a brief audience. Tell me why you think my situation is "commoditizing babies." This should be good.

I underestimated you; you are more obtuse than I gave you credit for.

Thank you, Mr. Dufresne. And great response -- very educational.

You should not have any children if you cannot put it together yourself.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Should you be bringing a baby into the world with these "health problems"?

I don't have health problems -- my wife does. Our little guy is doing just fine, so why would my wife's health problems be an issue. Interesting comment given that you have no idea what her health problems are.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP - the desperate women are the women forced for financial reasons to carry your embryo. The very fact that you thought about yourself first and not the womb-for-hire is very telling.

+1. There’s a reason that surrogacy is illegal in much of Western Europe. It’s exploitive.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This seems like a typical request you’d use an agency for.

Is it? OK, that is helpful to know if true. Just seems like most things I read are about people going to agencies to either have the surrogate help them create a baby, or have them work with IVF places to get pregnant (i.e., continue to go through IVF process). We literally only have one embryo to transfer and that is it -- no more IVF, etc. In any event, helpful to know, thanks.

As for the peanut gallery, reading about people taking issue surrogacy on here is one of the more bizarre things I see. I get the problems with forced surrogacy overseas, but I can't for the life of me see how someone could take issue with someone want to help someone else start a family when they are unable to for health reasons. But obviously many must like to troll and/or watch the world burn. It is at least good entertainment reading the responses, so I appreciate that part of it.

You can’t see the issue of commoditizing babies? You seriously don’t see the ethics issue with that? Are you that obtuse?
Watch the world burn? What are you talking about? Are you medicating?

OK, got for it. I will give you a brief audience. Tell me why you think my situation is "commoditizing babies." This should be good.

I underestimated you; you are more obtuse than I gave you credit for.

Thank you, Mr. Dufresne. And great response -- very educational.

Anonymous wrote:OP - the desperate women are the women forced for financial reasons to carry your embryo. The very fact that you thought about yourself first and not the womb-for-hire is very telling.

Anonymous wrote:OP - the desperate women are the women forced for financial reasons to carry your embryo. The very fact that you thought about yourself first and not the womb-for-hire is very telling.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This seems like a typical request you’d use an agency for.

Is it? OK, that is helpful to know if true. Just seems like most things I read are about people going to agencies to either have the surrogate help them create a baby, or have them work with IVF places to get pregnant (i.e., continue to go through IVF process). We literally only have one embryo to transfer and that is it -- no more IVF, etc. In any event, helpful to know, thanks.

As for the peanut gallery, reading about people taking issue surrogacy on here is one of the more bizarre things I see. I get the problems with forced surrogacy overseas, but I can't for the life of me see how someone could take issue with someone want to help someone else start a family when they are unable to for health reasons. But obviously many must like to troll and/or watch the world burn. It is at least good entertainment reading the responses, so I appreciate that part of it.

You can’t see the issue of commoditizing babies? You seriously don’t see the ethics issue with that? Are you that obtuse?
Watch the world burn? What are you talking about? Are you medicating?

OK, got for it. I will give you a brief audience. Tell me why you think my situation is "commoditizing babies." This should be good.

I underestimated you; you are more obtuse than I gave you credit for.

Thank you, Mr. Dufresne. And great response -- very educational.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This seems like a typical request you’d use an agency for.

Is it? OK, that is helpful to know if true. Just seems like most things I read are about people going to agencies to either have the surrogate help them create a baby, or have them work with IVF places to get pregnant (i.e., continue to go through IVF process). We literally only have one embryo to transfer and that is it -- no more IVF, etc. In any event, helpful to know, thanks.

As for the peanut gallery, reading about people taking issue surrogacy on here is one of the more bizarre things I see. I get the problems with forced surrogacy overseas, but I can't for the life of me see how someone could take issue with someone want to help someone else start a family when they are unable to for health reasons. But obviously many must like to troll and/or watch the world burn. It is at least good entertainment reading the responses, so I appreciate that part of it.

You can’t see the issue of commoditizing babies? You seriously don’t see the ethics issue with that? Are you that obtuse?
Watch the world burn? What are you talking about? Are you medicating?

OK, got for it. I will give you a brief audience. Tell me why you think my situation is "commoditizing babies." This should be good.

I underestimated you; you are more obtuse than I gave you credit for.

Thank you, Mr. Dufresne. And great response -- very educational.

Anonymous wrote:Should you be bringing a baby into the world with these "health problems"?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This seems like a typical request you’d use an agency for.

Is it? OK, that is helpful to know if true. Just seems like most things I read are about people going to agencies to either have the surrogate help them create a baby, or have them work with IVF places to get pregnant (i.e., continue to go through IVF process). We literally only have one embryo to transfer and that is it -- no more IVF, etc. In any event, helpful to know, thanks.

As for the peanut gallery, reading about people taking issue surrogacy on here is one of the more bizarre things I see. I get the problems with forced surrogacy overseas, but I can't for the life of me see how someone could take issue with someone want to help someone else start a family when they are unable to for health reasons. But obviously many must like to troll and/or watch the world burn. It is at least good entertainment reading the responses, so I appreciate that part of it.

Desperate woman.

Wait, do you think I am a woman? Ha, that makes these responses even better.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This seems like a typical request you’d use an agency for.

Is it? OK, that is helpful to know if true. Just seems like most things I read are about people going to agencies to either have the surrogate help them create a baby, or have them work with IVF places to get pregnant (i.e., continue to go through IVF process). We literally only have one embryo to transfer and that is it -- no more IVF, etc. In any event, helpful to know, thanks.

As for the peanut gallery, reading about people taking issue surrogacy on here is one of the more bizarre things I see. I get the problems with forced surrogacy overseas, but I can't for the life of me see how someone could take issue with someone want to help someone else start a family when they are unable to for health reasons. But obviously many must like to troll and/or watch the world burn. It is at least good entertainment reading the responses, so I appreciate that part of it.

You can’t see the issue of commoditizing babies? You seriously don’t see the ethics issue with that? Are you that obtuse?
Watch the world burn? What are you talking about? Are you medicating?

OK, got for it. I will give you a brief audience. Tell me why you think my situation is "commoditizing babies." This should be good.

I underestimated you; you are more obtuse than I gave you credit for.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This seems like a typical request you’d use an agency for.

Is it? OK, that is helpful to know if true. Just seems like most things I read are about people going to agencies to either have the surrogate help them create a baby, or have them work with IVF places to get pregnant (i.e., continue to go through IVF process). We literally only have one embryo to transfer and that is it -- no more IVF, etc. In any event, helpful to know, thanks.

As for the peanut gallery, reading about people taking issue surrogacy on here is one of the more bizarre things I see. I get the problems with forced surrogacy overseas, but I can't for the life of me see how someone could take issue with someone want to help someone else start a family when they are unable to for health reasons. But obviously many must like to troll and/or watch the world burn. It is at least good entertainment reading the responses, so I appreciate that part of it.

Desperate woman.

Wait, do you think I am a woman? Ha, that makes these responses even better.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This seems like a typical request you’d use an agency for.

Is it? OK, that is helpful to know if true. Just seems like most things I read are about people going to agencies to either have the surrogate help them create a baby, or have them work with IVF places to get pregnant (i.e., continue to go through IVF process). We literally only have one embryo to transfer and that is it -- no more IVF, etc. In any event, helpful to know, thanks.

As for the peanut gallery, reading about people taking issue surrogacy on here is one of the more bizarre things I see. I get the problems with forced surrogacy overseas, but I can't for the life of me see how someone could take issue with someone want to help someone else start a family when they are unable to for health reasons. But obviously many must like to troll and/or watch the world burn. It is at least good entertainment reading the responses, so I appreciate that part of it.

You can’t see the issue of commoditizing babies? You seriously don’t see the ethics issue with that? Are you that obtuse?
Watch the world burn? What are you talking about? Are you medicating?

OK, got for it. I will give you a brief audience. Tell me why you think my situation is "commoditizing babies." This should be good.