Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh, so there are repercussions for oppressing women for hundreds of years and now they get enhanced choice in who they procreate with? Boo hoo to you.
I don’t think you understand what this chart results in. You end up with a very small number of men that have enhanced choice. Many men that have no partners at all. And women who are pressured to have sex rather than relationships in the forlorn hope that the former will turn in to the latter.
I mean, all men have to do to be in the top 1/3 of men is to be about a 4. How is that not good news for men?
I feel like all gay men are able to achieve this. You can do this, OP.
I love you.
- Not OP
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:. Men are visual, it’s not surprise they find women more attractive. Women like different things.Anonymous wrote:This was so interesting:
![]()
So apparently women think all men are ugly. A thoroughly mid looking woman who rates only a 4-5 is probably looking for a man who is 6-7, which is basically an entire standard deviation or more away from the mean for how women are rating looks for men.
It seems like men evaluate the looks of women much more fairly given that the mean is about a 4/10, which should be expected (5/10). Women seem to have insane expectations for how their partners should look. I guess if you aren't Henry Cavill you're an instant 1 or 2. Modern dating cultures and apps have ruined all expectations, no doubt.
At the end of the day just because a man thinks a woman is attractive and will sleep with him doesn’t mean he wants her as a partner.
Single moms for instance, most are for recreational use only, they may be hot and guys will sleep with them, but most guys won’t wife them up. No man wants to continue another man’s saved game because the women he’s sleeping with made bad decisions in the past.
Too much at stake and family courts are a mess. That’s why most women will be unmarried and childless now. Men don’t need marriage to sleep with women as they give it up easily anyways…why by the cow when you get the milk for free and all that.
My friend, back slowly away from the Internet. Maybe try a hike in the woods? You are not OK.
Sorry the truth hurts you. Maybe you shouldn’t open your eyes and you’ll see why you can’t find a decent man.
I mean as long as women keep sleeping with men without a relationship why would we change up? There’s no reason to invest heavily in someone if I have their legs over my shoulders after one or two dates. I can keep living my life and keep myself free from headaches and when I need intimacy put in minimal effort and still get what I need.
And yes men, dress well, get in good shape and wash yourself so you smell nice. You do that and have a steady decent income you can basically get laid whenever you want.
Anonymous wrote:Is this a joke? The obvious answer is that since the moment they’re born females are told that that their primary value is their appearance, so they spend an incredible amount of time and money enhancing it. I believe the Internet pit you come from calls it “looks maxxing” and it’s more a requirement than an option.
Men, on the other hand, consider washing regularly to be the height of grooming. Men who actually take care of themselves get a big boost up the charts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:. Men are visual, it’s not surprise they find women more attractive. Women like different things.Anonymous wrote:This was so interesting:
![]()
So apparently women think all men are ugly. A thoroughly mid looking woman who rates only a 4-5 is probably looking for a man who is 6-7, which is basically an entire standard deviation or more away from the mean for how women are rating looks for men.
It seems like men evaluate the looks of women much more fairly given that the mean is about a 4/10, which should be expected (5/10). Women seem to have insane expectations for how their partners should look. I guess if you aren't Henry Cavill you're an instant 1 or 2. Modern dating cultures and apps have ruined all expectations, no doubt.
At the end of the day just because a man thinks a woman is attractive and will sleep with him doesn’t mean he wants her as a partner.
Single moms for instance, most are for recreational use only, they may be hot and guys will sleep with them, but most guys won’t wife them up. No man wants to continue another man’s saved game because the women he’s sleeping with made bad decisions in the past.
Too much at stake and family courts are a mess. That’s why most women will be unmarried and childless now. Men don’t need marriage to sleep with women as they give it up easily anyways…why by the cow when you get the milk for free and all that.
My friend, back slowly away from the Internet. Maybe try a hike in the woods? You are not OK.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh, so there are repercussions for oppressing women for hundreds of years and now they get enhanced choice in who they procreate with? Boo hoo to you.
I don’t think you understand what this chart results in. You end up with a very small number of men that have enhanced choice. Many men that have no partners at all. And women who are pressured to have sex rather than relationships in the forlorn hope that the former will turn in to the latter.
I mean, all men have to do to be in the top 1/3 of men is to be about a 4. How is that not good news for men?
I feel like all gay men are able to achieve this. You can do this, OP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh, so there are repercussions for oppressing women for hundreds of years and now they get enhanced choice in who they procreate with? Boo hoo to you.
I don’t think you understand what this chart results in. You end up with a very small number of men that have enhanced choice. Many men that have no partners at all. And women who are pressured to have sex rather than relationships in the forlorn hope that the former will turn in to the latter.
Anonymous wrote:. Men are visual, it’s not surprise they find women more attractive. Women like different things.Anonymous wrote:This was so interesting:
![]()
So apparently women think all men are ugly. A thoroughly mid looking woman who rates only a 4-5 is probably looking for a man who is 6-7, which is basically an entire standard deviation or more away from the mean for how women are rating looks for men.
It seems like men evaluate the looks of women much more fairly given that the mean is about a 4/10, which should be expected (5/10). Women seem to have insane expectations for how their partners should look. I guess if you aren't Henry Cavill you're an instant 1 or 2. Modern dating cultures and apps have ruined all expectations, no doubt.
At the end of the day just because a man thinks a woman is attractive and will sleep with him doesn’t mean he wants her as a partner.
Single moms for instance, most are for recreational use only, they may be hot and guys will sleep with them, but most guys won’t wife them up. No man wants to continue another man’s saved game because the women he’s sleeping with made bad decisions in the past.
Too much at stake and family courts are a mess. That’s why most women will be unmarried and childless now. Men don’t need marriage to sleep with women as they give it up easily anyways…why by the cow when you get the milk for free and all that.
. Men are visual, it’s not surprise they find women more attractive. Women like different things.Anonymous wrote:This was so interesting:
![]()
So apparently women think all men are ugly. A thoroughly mid looking woman who rates only a 4-5 is probably looking for a man who is 6-7, which is basically an entire standard deviation or more away from the mean for how women are rating looks for men.
It seems like men evaluate the looks of women much more fairly given that the mean is about a 4/10, which should be expected (5/10). Women seem to have insane expectations for how their partners should look. I guess if you aren't Henry Cavill you're an instant 1 or 2. Modern dating cultures and apps have ruined all expectations, no doubt.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh, so there are repercussions for oppressing women for hundreds of years and now they get enhanced choice in who they procreate with? Boo hoo to you.
lol…oppression Olympics.
I live how women say they’re oppressed yet men routinely fight and die in wars to protect the very women who say they’re oppressed. Or they work dangerous jobs that equate to men have 95% of workplace deaths.
Don’t see women clamoring to be working the in coal mines, oil fields and risking their lives in cargo ships so you can buy the latest Lululemon to complete your clean-girl aesthetic.
But yeah…women are oppressed….
Anonymous wrote:Oh, so there are repercussions for oppressing women for hundreds of years and now they get enhanced choice in who they procreate with? Boo hoo to you.