Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The FA form will ask about this but if your kids don't have access to these funds before the age of 25 (did I read that right?!) then no, it should not count against FA. 1 million is not a lot of money, they need to invest those funds so they have a comfortable adulthood like OPs mom wanted for them.
It’s insane to me that a family who has $2M to be used for solely for education thinks they are still entitled to FA.
Exactly
+1 this is obscene
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The FA form will ask about this but if your kids don't have access to these funds before the age of 25 (did I read that right?!) then no, it should not count against FA. 1 million is not a lot of money, they need to invest those funds so they have a comfortable adulthood like OPs mom wanted for them.
It’s insane to me that a family who has $2M to be used for solely for education thinks they are still entitled to FA.
Exactly
Anonymous wrote:The private schools are 100k+ for a year of tuition for both. The Fund totals about $1M currently for each kid. Obviously want to grow and keep for for them till they reach age 25 to take. At $100k a year for 6 more years and 4 more years each not incl college, that just seems a ton of spend! Our FA provides for 40% right now of the tuition total.
The Trust fund people seem to feel that we can keep FA and supplement a bit more via fund if we wanted to help our finances.
I wasn't sure if FA negates our opportunity to do that in total?
Anonymous wrote:OP you are also perfectly making the case for why the GOP push for “school choice vouchers” is a complete sham. Rich people will find a way to suck every penny out of the system, ethical or not. While people with less options and funds struggle.
Rich people are really the worst.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We currently are FA family with 2 kids in private MS. My mom who I was estranged with recently passed and listed my 2 kids - her only grandkids as the only beneficiaries to collect the fund at age 25. The money is not for us - is for them upon turning age 25 but with the exception of medical, educational and well being care, funds are able to be withdrawn upon the discretion of a 3rd party Fiduciary.
From what I've read online, irrevocable trust assets will impact FA because it's seen as family money. However, the 2 Trust management 3rd party orgs I've spoken with sounded like FA is something that can still work for us. I wasn't sure if they were just saying that as a sales technique for us to sign on with them or if anyone has had experience with this, would love to know.
We aren't a well to do family and again, the money will be held by a 3rd party to determine funds for our kids but for education, it could help us quite a bit. Wasn't sure however if we used it, we'd use every penny!
You should spend some money on a lawyer to resolve your questions, not rely on any advice you get here. Just because the trustee may have the authority to pay for the beneficiaries education, it does not mean that the trustee will or should do so. A trustee might reasonably ask why your children should start paying for their education, when you have been able to do so up to now with the benefit of FA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We currently are FA family with 2 kids in private MS. My mom who I was estranged with recently passed and listed my 2 kids - her only grandkids as the only beneficiaries to collect the fund at age 25. The money is not for us - is for them upon turning age 25 but with the exception of medical, educational and well being care, funds are able to be withdrawn upon the discretion of a 3rd party Fiduciary.
From what I've read online, irrevocable trust assets will impact FA because it's seen as family money. However, the 2 Trust management 3rd party orgs I've spoken with sounded like FA is something that can still work for us. I wasn't sure if they were just saying that as a sales technique for us to sign on with them or if anyone has had experience with this, would love to know.
We aren't a well to do family and again, the money will be held by a 3rd party to determine funds for our kids but for education, it could help us quite a bit. Wasn't sure however if we used it, we'd use every penny!
You should spend some money on a lawyer to resolve your questions, not rely on any advice you get here. Just because the trustee may have the authority to pay for the beneficiaries education, it does not mean that the trustee will or should do so. A trustee might reasonably ask why your children should start paying for their education, when you have been able to do so up to now with the benefit of FA.
Anonymous wrote:We currently are FA family with 2 kids in private MS. My mom who I was estranged with recently passed and listed my 2 kids - her only grandkids as the only beneficiaries to collect the fund at age 25. The money is not for us - is for them upon turning age 25 but with the exception of medical, educational and well being care, funds are able to be withdrawn upon the discretion of a 3rd party Fiduciary.
From what I've read online, irrevocable trust assets will impact FA because it's seen as family money. However, the 2 Trust management 3rd party orgs I've spoken with sounded like FA is something that can still work for us. I wasn't sure if they were just saying that as a sales technique for us to sign on with them or if anyone has had experience with this, would love to know.
We aren't a well to do family and again, the money will be held by a 3rd party to determine funds for our kids but for education, it could help us quite a bit. Wasn't sure however if we used it, we'd use every penny!
Anonymous wrote:The FA form will ask about this but if your kids don't have access to these funds before the age of 25 (did I read that right?!) then no, it should not count against FA. 1 million is not a lot of money, they need to invest those funds so they have a comfortable adulthood like OPs mom wanted for them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The FA form will ask about this but if your kids don't have access to these funds before the age of 25 (did I read that right?!) then no, it should not count against FA. 1 million is not a lot of money, they need to invest those funds so they have a comfortable adulthood like OPs mom wanted for them.
It’s insane to me that a family who has $2M to be used for solely for education thinks they are still entitled to FA.
Anonymous wrote:The FA form will ask about this but if your kids don't have access to these funds before the age of 25 (did I read that right?!) then no, it should not count against FA. 1 million is not a lot of money, they need to invest those funds so they have a comfortable adulthood like OPs mom wanted for them.
Anonymous wrote:The FA form will ask about this but if your kids don't have access to these funds before the age of 25 (did I read that right?!) then no, it should not count against FA. 1 million is not a lot of money, they need to invest those funds so they have a comfortable adulthood like OPs mom wanted for them.