Anonymous wrote:Why on earth do you people have such a hard time with this??? Being in the office makes no damn difference—people that don’t work at home, don’t work any better in the office, and I don’t have time to hold their hands.
^^Disagree 100% with the above statement. I have hybrid worked for 20+ years, was in a federal agency’s inaugural telework program, and have found some people just aren’t good at WFH in part due to the distractions mentioned by OP. My current company has a remote work policy that in many respects mirrors the policy I signed with a federal agency 20+ years ago . . . “Remote work will not be used in lieu of childcare [in other words, if you have small kids you need to have child care that is not you], will be available during [stated] core hours, will be available for in-person meetings on short notice, etc.” I manage a few employees now that I need to check in on frequently, i.e., a weekly team meeting, at least one one-on-one meeting to run through tasks and more frequent check-ins.
Weekly meetings are normal, those should be happening in office too.
I don't have a problem with anything you stated re: availability, that's standard. But IME, WFH has really shone a light on workplaces that don't treat management as a real, separate job rather than an afterthought. Managers are supposed to be in regular touch with staff, planning work, etc.