Anonymous wrote:Two kids at Sidwell. It is not "worth it" or good value. Likely only incrementally better overall, and worse in some aspects, than public W options. Very hard to make economic argument though - like healthcare - you want the best for your loved ones and price is secondary consideration until not affordable. Sidwell is a business - while 20x more applicants than places they will continue to increase the price until demand drops. We will likely leave in next few years unless school undergoes major turnaround in accountability to students and parents - but not because they keep ratcheting up the tuition above inflation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is the education that much better than Whitman?
Whitman and Churchill arguably provide better rigor/education than any of the privates in the area. They are known as “W” schools.
No they don’t.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is the education that much better than Whitman?
Yes, the overall educational experience is superior. Plus, Sidwell consistently sends a higher percentage of graduates to Ivy+ colleges than the W schools.
https://moco360.media/2023/09/13/where-montgomery-county-high-school-graduates-are-going-to-college/
Because it’s a completely different pool of kids (public schools educate everyone whereas Sidwell is selecting the advantaged few). Selection bias at its finest. Doesn’t make it a better school.
Yes, it does. Selection bias, well-prepared, wealthier and better resourced students (among many other reasons) are why Sidwell is a better school. Selection bias eliminates a lot of problem students, and it elevates the experience for the privileged few who remain. I know it’s not pc to say these things, but you know it’s true.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is the education that much better than Whitman?
Yes, the overall educational experience is superior. Plus, Sidwell consistently sends a higher percentage of graduates to Ivy+ colleges than the W schools.
https://moco360.media/2023/09/13/where-montgomery-county-high-school-graduates-are-going-to-college/
Because it’s a completely different pool of kids (public schools educate everyone whereas Sidwell is selecting the advantaged few). Selection bias at its finest. Doesn’t make it a better school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is the education that much better than Whitman?
Yes, the overall educational experience is superior. Plus, Sidwell consistently sends a higher percentage of graduates to Ivy+ colleges than the W schools.
https://moco360.media/2023/09/13/where-montgomery-county-high-school-graduates-are-going-to-college/
Anonymous wrote:Anybody paying 50k for preschool is a fool.
Anonymous wrote:Is the education that much better than Whitman?
Anonymous wrote:Anybody paying 50k for preschool is a fool.
Anonymous wrote:How do people pay this and save for college?
Anonymous wrote:Two kids at Sidwell. It is not "worth it" or good value. Likely only incrementally better overall, and worse in some aspects, than public W options. Very hard to make economic argument though - like healthcare - you want the best for your loved ones and price is secondary consideration until not affordable. Sidwell is a business - while 20x more applicants than places they will continue to increase the price until demand drops. We will likely leave in next few years unless school undergoes major turnaround in accountability to students and parents - but not because they keep ratcheting up the tuition above inflation.
Anonymous wrote:Why don’t they announce the tuition increases before the application deadline?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is the education that much better than Whitman?
Whitman and Churchill arguably provide better rigor/education than any of the privates in the area. They are known as “W” schools.