Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The interaction between kid and school is dynamic, not static. It's less about what the school "gives" than about what the kid puts in, and in a variety of ways. Is she the kind of kid who will throw her full self in regardless of where she winds up? Maybe it doesn't matter. Does she feel like she'll thrive at one more than the other, and if so, why?
When you close your eyes and picture her at both places, do you see a difference in terms of little things -- how she greets the day, whether and how she asks questions of professors, the likelihood of her putting herself forward to work on projects, the width of the net she casts socially, etc.?
I'm a new poster ... just wanted to say that this is great! My kid is in a similar decision-making process. This is a good exercise!
I'm not that PP but one who just mentioned "fit" and this is not just a thought exercise, it's crucial to choosing based on more than the cost of a school. I've had friends, and my DD (recent college grad) has had friends, who did not look at whether they actually wanted to LIVE at their college for four years of their young lives, did not did not delve into how the classes and major programs were structured and what they'd actually be doing with their time for four years of study, etc. I'm amazed how many threads on DCUM are entirely about costs and give the impression that no students or parents think to ask much about curriculum structure, ease of taking courses across departments, colleges' processes for helping students who need academic--or just as important, mental health--help, etc. etc. Those things all matter. Your kid has to live at this place and navigate its academic and social structures for four years.
To be clear, I"m speaking generally and not bashing OP, who seems to be trying to win a money discussion with her DH. But wow, his site overall often comes across as not looking very hard into anything more than costs and where schools fall on "ranking" lists.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The interaction between kid and school is dynamic, not static. It's less about what the school "gives" than about what the kid puts in, and in a variety of ways. Is she the kind of kid who will throw her full self in regardless of where she winds up? Maybe it doesn't matter. Does she feel like she'll thrive at one more than the other, and if so, why?
When you close your eyes and picture her at both places, do you see a difference in terms of little things -- how she greets the day, whether and how she asks questions of professors, the likelihood of her putting herself forward to work on projects, the width of the net she casts socially, etc.?
I'm a new poster ... just wanted to say that this is great! My kid is in a similar decision-making process. This is a good exercise!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here- Indiana is an interesting one. I agree that Kelly has a great reputation, but she only got $8000 merit which might make it considerably more than some of the other schools. She has also expressed interest in real estate which would be a better fit in Wisconsin's business school.
For that reason, I am trying to get an overall feel of paying more for an out-of-state flagship vs Towson specifically. Once merit comes out at all of the different schools, we will help her narrow it down- she got into so many great options that it's almost an embarrassment of riches- except of course UMD.
Do students leaving Towson's business school have good career options? Or would really any flagship offer better options?
OP—please hear this. Your DD does. It want to go to Towson. She will be “embarrassed” to go there. (Her words as told to us by you.)
I know you want a good ROI, but if you make her go to a school she expressly doesn’t want, she may be a lot more likely to drop out of school bc she hates it so much that she can’t bear to be there. And that ROI will not be so great.
You have said you have the money to send her elsewhere (even though it will be tight), so IMO, that is your answer.
Anonymous wrote:OP here- Indiana is an interesting one. I agree that Kelly has a great reputation, but she only got $8000 merit which might make it considerably more than some of the other schools. She has also expressed interest in real estate which would be a better fit in Wisconsin's business school.
For that reason, I am trying to get an overall feel of paying more for an out-of-state flagship vs Towson specifically. Once merit comes out at all of the different schools, we will help her narrow it down- she got into so many great options that it's almost an embarrassment of riches- except of course UMD.
Do students leaving Towson's business school have good career options? Or would really any flagship offer better options?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here- Indiana is an interesting one. I agree that Kelly has a great reputation, but she only got $8000 merit which might make it considerably more than some of the other schools. She has also expressed interest in real estate which would be a better fit in Wisconsin's business school.
For that reason, I am trying to get an overall feel of paying more for an out-of-state flagship vs Towson specifically. Once merit comes out at all of the different schools, we will help her narrow it down- she got into so many great options that it's almost an embarrassment of riches- except of course UMD.
Do students leaving Towson's business school have good career options? Or would really any flagship offer better options?
I don’t get it. Do you want peoples input and then they give it to you and then you’re fighting them on it.
Sorry, you’re right. I guess I was writing to settle an argument with DH about in-state option vs out-of-state rather than focusing too much on the actual schools (although we can take a $12000 extra hit annually, $20000 would be way harder so we are not planning on having her commit anywhere until we see the actual financial papers. Due to Indiana’s lower merit, it might take that school out of contention, even if it has the best ROI).
Anonymous wrote:The interaction between kid and school is dynamic, not static. It's less about what the school "gives" than about what the kid puts in, and in a variety of ways. Is she the kind of kid who will throw her full self in regardless of where she winds up? Maybe it doesn't matter. Does she feel like she'll thrive at one more than the other, and if so, why?
When you close your eyes and picture her at both places, do you see a difference in terms of little things -- how she greets the day, whether and how she asks questions of professors, the likelihood of her putting herself forward to work on projects, the width of the net she casts socially, etc.?
Anonymous wrote:DD did not get admitted into our state flagship (UMD). Her state backup is Towson.
DH and I are disagreeing about what is her better option long term and I am curious what DCUM has to say!
With that said, would you rather...
1) Attend the in-state school for the cost savings
2) Attend an out-of-state flagship for approximately 12,000 more annually (school is unknown- there are many choices including Indiana- Kelly direct admit, Wisconsin, Penn State- UP, Ohio State, South Carolina, Clemson)
The degree is business- though she is not sure what area.
Would a state flagship's ROI be substantial enough to offset the cost difference? The $12,000 annually is not a deal breaker for us, but will also be felt at home.
Also, our daughter is adamantly against Towson and feels it is embarrassing, so you can guess which direction she is going in!
What say you DCUM?
Anonymous wrote:Using this website https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/7583742/
ROI business degree
Towson $317k
Penn State $1,190k
Indiana- Kelly $1,167k
Wisconsin $871k
South Carolina $783k
Ohio State $689k
Clemson $321k
Therefore, yes, the right OOS school is going to offset the cost difference between that and Towson.