Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is the process for that?
Biden can fire him and appoint someone new.
Anonymous wrote:
If Graves is doing fine on J6 prosecutions then maybe the answer is to let him keep doing that, but provide Graves with a backup and extra staff for the rest of the DC crime prosecutions.
Maybe some of the "connected" folks on this board should be making that suggestion.
Bring up some aggressive, ambitious AUSAs from Texas or somewhere on a special detail to prosecute local D.C. crimes.
Anonymous wrote:In the circular firing squad that is DC's failure to address crime, there is the Mayor, the Council, MPD, DCAG Racine and then US Attorney Graves. The Biden administration has the power to replace Graves with someone who would be more aggressive about prosecutions. One of the Dems' biggest weaknesses is that they are too soft on crime because of the policies pushed by the progressive wing of the party (with the DC Council being the laboratory for some of those failed experiments). Biden can't do anything about the makeup of the DC Council but can and should replace Graves.
Anonymous wrote:I’m no fan of Graves. But you have to listen closely to his explanation because it’s actually pretty scary. If you listen you will hear him say it’s almost impossible to get a DC jury, all 12 people, to vote unanimously for conviction. No matter how overwhelming the evidence. Now let that sink in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My guess is that Graves has to work with the labor pool he inherited at USAO-DC. Career staff are exercising discretion to not prosecute.
He may need to roll a few heads to change the culture of the office.
I think this is an accurate assessment. It’s been mentioned before that right around the time Graves took over there were many actual career prosecutors that retired or left the office for other reasons. You have to remember that the current environment isn’t (and hasn’t been for quite some time) conducive to hiring prosecutors in progressive cities who actually want to be prosecutors, as opposed to those “prosecutors” who think they can effectuate criminal justice reform from the inside but actually have little desire or aptitude for prosecuting street crime.