Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No to safari. I have been on safari many many times. Little kids would not enjoy them after the first couple of sightings of animals. After that, it’s a lot of the same, or it’s hours searching for the hard to find leopard. Young kids would be bored out of their mind.
I would do Australia. So much to do, and your kids would love it. You can do a good mix of cities, rainforest, Great Barrier Reef, and Ayers Rock.
If safaris are so tedious for you, why on earth do you go on “many?“
Many safari companies don't allow kids.
I've been on several safaris and while I love them, they really are not ideal for kids. A lot of waiting around, every day is an early morning start, nothing to do at the camps afterwards and very limited mobility. Safaris are actually extremely sedentary.
There is a Four Seasons that has an interesting hybrid / safari situation - take a look at that.
Anonymous wrote:I’m gonna rain on your parade.
I wouldn’t plan my trip of a lifetime for kids that young. I’d wait until they’re older. They’re not going to appreciate it and it won’t be worth the money.
We’ve gone on several “trips of a lifetime“, including our entire family on a luxurious safari, but we waited until everyone was older.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Id do Antarctica or Galapagos. Safaris can be far cheaper than your budget.
Yea. Safaris that suck.
Anonymous wrote:Don’t do Antarctica at those ages - many of the activities will not be well suited for kids and the drake passage crossing can be brutal.
Safari or Australia would get my vote. You may even be able to do 2 trips at that price - I’d seriously considering go all in Thailand or similar.
Anonymous wrote:I’m gonna rain on your parade.
I wouldn’t plan my trip of a lifetime for kids that young. I’d wait until they’re older. They’re not going to appreciate it and it won’t be worth the money.
We’ve gone on several “trips of a lifetime“, including our entire family on a luxurious safari, but we waited until everyone was older.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Id do Antarctica or Galapagos. Safaris can be far cheaper than your budget.
Yea. Safaris that suck.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No to safari. I have been on safari many many times. Little kids would not enjoy them after the first couple of sightings of animals. After that, it’s a lot of the same, or it’s hours searching for the hard to find leopard. Young kids would be bored out of their mind.
I would do Australia. So much to do, and your kids would love it. You can do a good mix of cities, rainforest, Great Barrier Reef, and Ayers Rock.
If safaris are so tedious for you, why on earth do you go on “many?“
Many safari companies don't allow kids.
I've been on several safaris and while I love them, they really are not ideal for kids. A lot of waiting around, every day is an early morning start, nothing to do at the camps afterwards and very limited mobility. Safaris are actually extremely sedentary.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No to safari. I have been on safari many many times. Little kids would not enjoy them after the first couple of sightings of animals. After that, it’s a lot of the same, or it’s hours searching for the hard to find leopard. Young kids would be bored out of their mind.
I would do Australia. So much to do, and your kids would love it. You can do a good mix of cities, rainforest, Great Barrier Reef, and Ayers Rock.
If safaris are so tedious for you, why on earth do you go on “many?“