Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Honest question, how can a political party outlaw a medicine? Why would they have any right to tell any person what medicines they have access to?

The government determines what medicines/substances you can use or not use. That's largely determined by regulatory agencies of the executive branch, but legislative bodies intervene on the regular: see medical marijuana.

Birth Control, specifically of the hormonal type, has costs associated with it. Currently we're ok with those costs: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/hormones/oral-contraceptives-fact-sheet

What is this veiled threat crap against hormonal birth control you are pushing?

Yes, we are indeed OK with it. Because it FREES us from unwanted pregnancies.

And some of us used it happily for decades.

OP. What’s weird about that PP sharing that link is that from their own link, hormonal birth control use appears to be protective against ovarian, endometrial and colorectal cancer.

It’s also a red herring. It is the ability to control when and how many children that has largely liberated women from a lifetime of thankless and endless hard work and has limited the physical risks of pregnancy and birth, which is of course why Republicans want to ban it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean...go for it I guess, but they're going to start losing elections in red states if they start going down this path.

This is really glib. There is a whole generation of women's lives about to be ruined.

Because it’s never going to happen. This isn’t like reversing Roe. On what legal basis could they do this? And this would be ridiculously unpopular across the country.

Overturning Roe is ridiculously unpopular across the country.
Remember when overturning roe was never gonna happen? I guess you don’t …

If overturning Roe was such a horrible mistake for republicans, who will pay the price in lost elections all over the country, as democrats are constantly telling us, then why are dems upset about them overturning Roe? I mean, dems should be ecstatic they overturned it, because they’ll win elections because of it.

Why are dems pretending to be upset about it? They should be high-fiving each other at all the elections they’re going to win in ‘24. Why claim to be angry about it?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean...go for it I guess, but they're going to start losing elections in red states if they start going down this path.

This is really glib. There is a whole generation of women's lives about to be ruined.

Because it’s never going to happen. This isn’t like reversing Roe. On what legal basis could they do this? And this would be ridiculously unpopular across the country.

Overturning Roe is ridiculously unpopular across the country.
Remember when overturning roe was never gonna happen? I guess you don’t …

If overturning Roe was such a horrible mistake for republicans, who will pay the price in lost elections all over the country, as democrats are constantly telling us, then why are dems upset about them overturning Roe? I mean, dems should be ecstatic they overturned it, because they’ll win elections because of it.

Why are dems pretending to be upset about it? They should be high-fiving each other at all the elections they’re going to win in ‘24. Why claim to be angry about it?

Because we care about the lives of women and girls impacted by the overturning of RvW that why. I understand why that’s hard for you republicans to understand given your historical lack of concern for others.

OP and +1. Why would I be happy that millions of women and girls are now having babies they didn’t want and can’t afford? Why would be ecstatic that women are experiencing physical pain and possibly death for want of a simple and safe procedure?

And I’m certainly not going to be happy that the sadist party is now going after birth control too.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean...go for it I guess, but they're going to start losing elections in red states if they start going down this path.

This is really glib. There is a whole generation of women's lives about to be ruined.

Because it’s never going to happen. This isn’t like reversing Roe. On what legal basis could they do this? And this would be ridiculously unpopular across the country.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean...go for it I guess, but they're going to start losing elections in red states if they start going down this path.

This is really glib. There is a whole generation of women's lives about to be ruined.

Because it’s never going to happen. This isn’t like reversing Roe. On what legal basis could they do this? And this would be ridiculously unpopular across the country.

Overturning Roe is ridiculously unpopular across the country.
Remember when overturning roe was never gonna happen? I guess you don’t …

If overturning Roe was such a horrible mistake for republicans, who will pay the price in lost elections all over the country, as democrats are constantly telling us, then why are dems upset about them overturning Roe? I mean, dems should be ecstatic they overturned it, because they’ll win elections because of it.

Why are dems pretending to be upset about it? They should be high-fiving each other at all the elections they’re going to win in ‘24. Why claim to be angry about it?

Because we care about the lives of women and girls impacted by the overturning of RvW that why. I understand why that’s hard for you republicans to understand given your historical lack of concern for others.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean...go for it I guess, but they're going to start losing elections in red states if they start going down this path.

This is really glib. There is a whole generation of women's lives about to be ruined.

Because it’s never going to happen. This isn’t like reversing Roe. On what legal basis could they do this? And this would be ridiculously unpopular across the country.

Overturning Roe is ridiculously unpopular across the country.
Remember when overturning roe was never gonna happen? I guess you don’t …

If overturning Roe was such a horrible mistake for republicans, who will pay the price in lost elections all over the country, as democrats are constantly telling us, then why are dems upset about them overturning Roe? I mean, dems should be ecstatic they overturned it, because they’ll win elections because of it.

Why are dems pretending to be upset about it? They should be high-fiving each other at all the elections they’re going to win in ‘24. Why claim to be angry about it?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean...go for it I guess, but they're going to start losing elections in red states if they start going down this path.

This is really glib. There is a whole generation of women's lives about to be ruined.

Because it’s never going to happen. This isn’t like reversing Roe. On what legal basis could they do this? And this would be ridiculously unpopular across the country.

Overturning Roe is ridiculously unpopular across the country.
Remember when overturning roe was never gonna happen? I guess you don’t …

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean...go for it I guess, but they're going to start losing elections in red states if they start going down this path.

This is really glib. There is a whole generation of women's lives about to be ruined.

Because it’s never going to happen. This isn’t like reversing Roe. On what legal basis could they do this? And this would be ridiculously unpopular across the country.

The anti-abortionists view the pill as an abortifacient. That’s how.

Another example of a lack of nuance. Given the day-after pills prevent implantation there's no abortion. There never was a viable pregnancy to begin with.

But the anti-abortionists have a hard time accepting such medical realities.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean...go for it I guess, but they're going to start losing elections in red states if they start going down this path.

This is really glib. There is a whole generation of women's lives about to be ruined.

Because it’s never going to happen. This isn’t like reversing Roe. On what legal basis could they do this? And this would be ridiculously unpopular across the country.

The anti-abortionists view the pill as an abortifacient. That’s how.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Honest question, how can a political party outlaw a medicine? Why would they have any right to tell any person what medicines they have access to?

The government determines what medicines/substances you can use or not use. That's largely determined by regulatory agencies of the executive branch, but legislative bodies intervene on the regular: see medical marijuana.

Birth Control, specifically of the hormonal type, has costs associated with it. Currently we're ok with those costs: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/hormones/oral-contraceptives-fact-sheet

What is this veiled threat crap against hormonal birth control you are pushing?

Yes, we are indeed OK with it. Because it FREES us from unwanted pregnancies.

And some of us used it happily for decades.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Honest question, how can a political party outlaw a medicine? Why would they have any right to tell any person what medicines they have access to?

The government determines what medicines/substances you can use or not use. That's largely determined by regulatory agencies of the executive branch, but legislative bodies intervene on the regular: see medical marijuana.

Birth Control, specifically of the hormonal type, has costs associated with it. Currently we're ok with those costs: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/hormones/oral-contraceptives-fact-sheet

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Honest question, how can a political party outlaw a medicine? Why would they have any right to tell any person what medicines they have access to?

Did you just wake from a coma?
They are in process of outlawing a drug used for a medical abortion.
They have been successful and it is going to the supremes this year.
And all sorts of drugs get banned.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean...go for it I guess, but they're going to start losing elections in red states if they start going down this path.

This is really glib. There is a whole generation of women's lives about to be ruined.

Because it’s never going to happen. This isn’t like reversing Roe. On what legal basis could they do this? And this would be ridiculously unpopular across the country.

Anonymous wrote:Honest question, how can a political party outlaw a medicine? Why would they have any right to tell any person what medicines they have access to?