Anonymous wrote:More like T30.
It depends on colleges but highly selective for Stern, CAS, and Tish.
Stern and CAS had 7% acceptance rate last year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The US News ranking jumped the shark with its latest manipulations. It doesn't change what NYU is, a decently prestigious but pricey school in the heart of Manhattan.
There is no need to decide whether it's 22 or 32 or whatever.
US News is more accurate now than in the past.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you REALLY think the quality of NYU relative to WUSTL/Emory changed by much from year to year based on what USNWR rankings say? Exh A as to why ranking colleges as a whole is worse than meaningless.
Most undergrads in the T100 are good. But I'm only willing to pay 300k for a name brand with strong ascending reputation. Is that NYU? That's what I'm asking.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The US News ranking jumped the shark with its latest manipulations. It doesn't change what NYU is, a decently prestigious but pricey school in the heart of Manhattan.
There is no need to decide whether it's 22 or 32 or whatever.
US News is more accurate now than in the past.
No, it give more points to schools with more poorer students.
That's not accurate and a way to evaluate schools.
I don't care if students are poor or rich. I care quality of the students.
Define "quality of the students". If you mean high stats, the top universities don't only take students with the highest stats. Otherwise, my very high stats kid would be at a T10, but instead, DC is at a state flagship (and they are happy there).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The US News ranking jumped the shark with its latest manipulations. It doesn't change what NYU is, a decently prestigious but pricey school in the heart of Manhattan.
There is no need to decide whether it's 22 or 32 or whatever.
US News is more accurate now than in the past.
No, it give more points to schools with more poorer students.
That's not accurate and a way to evaluate schools.
I don't care if students are poor or rich. I care quality of the students.
Highest achieving kids are not always wealthy. If you want your kid with the highest achieving peers in college, then the new system makes sense.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The US News ranking jumped the shark with its latest manipulations. It doesn't change what NYU is, a decently prestigious but pricey school in the heart of Manhattan.
There is no need to decide whether it's 22 or 32 or whatever.
US News is more accurate now than in the past.
No, it give more points to schools with more poorer students.
That's not accurate and a way to evaluate schools.
I don't care if students are poor or rich. I care quality of the students.
Anonymous wrote:The US News ranking jumped the shark with its latest manipulations. It doesn't change what NYU is, a decently prestigious but pricey school in the heart of Manhattan.
There is no need to decide whether it's 22 or 32 or whatever.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The US News ranking jumped the shark with its latest manipulations. It doesn't change what NYU is, a decently prestigious but pricey school in the heart of Manhattan.
There is no need to decide whether it's 22 or 32 or whatever.
US News is more accurate now than in the past.
No, it give more points to schools with more poorer students.
That's not accurate and a way to evaluate schools.
I don't care if students are poor or rich. I care quality of the students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The US News ranking jumped the shark with its latest manipulations. It doesn't change what NYU is, a decently prestigious but pricey school in the heart of Manhattan.
There is no need to decide whether it's 22 or 32 or whatever.
US News is more accurate now than in the past.
Anonymous wrote:The US News ranking jumped the shark with its latest manipulations. It doesn't change what NYU is, a decently prestigious but pricey school in the heart of Manhattan.
There is no need to decide whether it's 22 or 32 or whatever.