Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The questionnaire and referral were due Dec 15th - but so were work samples, until the screener email updated that 馃し. Ask your AART for clarification.
It's incredibly unfair that in pool families have all of winter break to pull together work samples for their children. I'm sure some of these tiger families have been doing enrichment up the wazoo over winter break with all this time on their hands.
Another FCPS FAIL.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The questionnaire and referral were due Dec 15th - but so were work samples, until the screener email updated that 馃し. Ask your AART for clarification.
It's incredibly unfair that in pool families have all of winter break to pull together work samples for their children. I'm sure some of these tiger families have been doing enrichment up the wazoo over winter break with all this time on their hands.
Another FCPS FAIL.
I don't think the extra 20 days matter that much. Second, tiger families would have submitted theirs before 12/15 because they always meet the known deadline.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The questionnaire and referral were due Dec 15th - but so were work samples, until the screener email updated that 馃し. Ask your AART for clarification.
It's incredibly unfair that in pool families have all of winter break to pull together work samples for their children. I'm sure some of these tiger families have been doing enrichment up the wazoo over winter break with all this time on their hands.
Another FCPS FAIL.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The questionnaire and referral were due Dec 15th - but so were work samples, until the screener email updated that 馃し. Ask your AART for clarification.
It's incredibly unfair that in pool families have all of winter break to pull together work samples for their children. I'm sure some of these tiger families have been doing enrichment up the wazoo over winter break with all this time on their hands.
Another FCPS FAIL.
Anonymous wrote:The questionnaire and referral were due Dec 15th - but so were work samples, until the screener email updated that 馃し. Ask your AART for clarification.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Parents may submit up to two optional work samples. Please share with your AART at your local school by January 5, 2024
I copied this from their email .
My son is grade 2
Huh, they must be trying to make the kids who are in-pool stronger. Our AART has said for years that kids who are parent referred end up looking better than many in-pool kids because they have all the extra paragraphs of justification and the extra work samples.
Inpool candidates have ahistorically been given the option of providing 2 additional work samples. Many inpool candidates don't submit those optional samples (uninvolved or overly confident parents, I'm guessing.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Parents may submit up to two optional work samples. Please share with your AART at your local school by January 5, 2024
I copied this from their email .
My son is grade 2
Huh, they must be trying to make the kids who are in-pool stronger. Our AART has said for years that kids who are parent referred end up looking better than many in-pool kids because they have all the extra paragraphs of justification and the extra work samples.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Parents may submit up to two optional work samples. Please share with your AART at your local school by January 5, 2024
I copied this from their email .
My son is grade 2
Huh, they must be trying to make the kids who are in-pool stronger. Our AART has said for years that kids who are parent referred end up looking better than many in-pool kids because they have all the extra paragraphs of justification and the extra work samples.
Kids whose parents don鈥檛 refer will have plenty of work samples provided by the school.