Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’d be looking at Springfield - just west of the Mixing Bowl in the giant Springfield Plaza parking lot.
Even worse than Potomac Yards in terms of who would actually go to the games.
Personally, now that Angelos is gone, I would just go back to being an O's fan if the Nats were to leave Navy Yard.
Np. That site is actually easier to access for a substantial part of the region’s population than PY.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lease has 15 years to go, so not worth speculating on for a long time.
Speculation is what successful VC firms do. That’s just about the right amount of time to acquire enough disassociated parcels and lots around various possible stadium locations to make a tidy profit when the time comes to sell them to other developers. In the meantime you’re still generating income from the tenet businesses.
Frankly I’m shocked anyone here doesn’t understand how VC works.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I heard they may tear down pentagon city mall for this. Metro is already there.
Why would they tear down a jobs and tax revenue generator for a baseball stadium?
Have you been to that mall lately??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’d be looking at Springfield - just west of the Mixing Bowl in the giant Springfield Plaza parking lot.
Even worse than Potomac Yards in terms of who would actually go to the games.
Personally, now that Angelos is gone, I would just go back to being an O's fan if the Nats were to leave Navy Yard.
Anonymous wrote:I’d be looking at Springfield - just west of the Mixing Bowl in the giant Springfield Plaza parking lot.
Anonymous wrote:I’d be looking at Springfield - just west of the Mixing Bowl in the giant Springfield Plaza parking lot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I heard they may tear down pentagon city mall for this. Metro is already there.
That would require FAA approval. The stadium lights could be problematic for aircraft flying in or out of National.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lease has 15 years to go, so not worth speculating on for a long time.
Speculation is what successful VC firms do. That’s just about the right amount of time to acquire enough disassociated parcels and lots around various possible stadium locations to make a tidy profit when the time comes to sell them to other developers. In the meantime you’re still generating income from the tenet businesses.
Frankly I’m shocked anyone here doesn’t understand how VC works.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I heard they may tear down pentagon city mall for this. Metro is already there.
Put them at White Flint!! The Lerners already own the property!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lease has 15 years to go, so not worth speculating on for a long time.
Speculation is what successful VC firms do. That’s just about the right amount of time to acquire enough disassociated parcels and lots around various possible stadium locations to make a tidy profit when the time comes to sell them to other developers. In the meantime you’re still generating income from the tenet businesses.
Frankly I’m shocked anyone here doesn’t understand how VC works.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lease has 15 years to go, so not worth speculating on for a long time.
You must be a DC council member.
Nah, I post about crime on this board all the time and hate what’s happened to the city. But worrying about the Nats when there lease isn’t up for 15 years is not as stupid as the idiots who think Baltimore will get and thrive as an NHL city, but in the same zip code.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I heard they may tear down pentagon city mall for this. Metro is already there.
Spectacular! They can run a streetcar down Columbia Pike while they are at it.
Anonymous wrote:I heard they may tear down pentagon city mall for this. Metro is already there.