Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m part of a FB minimalist group that kind of does this. It’s more about rejecting conspicuous consumption and spending on values and priorities.
Maybe in your FB group it is, but among my friends in real life who do it, it’s about obnoxious virtue signaling. Look how little we need! Because kindness is more important than gifts! And I will tell EVERYONE that I’m only buying my kids one gift!
You do you, but I don’t see why you need to shout that kindness from the rooftops unless you’re hoping for some attention for it.
Anonymous wrote:Regarding the argument that they are trying to normalize a less consumption-focused Christmas -- this is only true if the family is generally not consuming a lot. And if you want to actively brag about this, you better REALLY walk the walk on being anti-consumerist.
Bragging about how you didn't buy your kid Christmas presents because you wanted to buy them the experience of skiing in Aspen is not anti-consumerist. Bragging about only buying your kid one Christmas present when you're a family of 4 living in a 5,000 house on a 1/2 acre lot and have two luxury cars is not anti-consumerist. Bragging about how you only gave your kids a gift in January when your kid has the newest and best of everything (just not received as Christmas presents) is not anti-consumerist.
Anonymous wrote:There is nothing wrong with any of those things.
-the kid probably has plenty of toys and more just creates more clutter and more cleaning
-I grew up with the sleeping bag on the hotel floor well into elementary school
-I know several European families that do that (gifts on Jan 6 not on Christmas.) Nothing wrong with giving into excess and materialism.
Anonymous wrote:I’m part of a FB minimalist group that kind of does this. It’s more about rejecting conspicuous consumption and spending on values and priorities.