Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You were .... snooping on your mom's phone? Are you 12?
And thank goodness she did.
OP, this will help you avoid years of frustration.
Do you advise that people in general look at messages that were not intended for them?
Can you think of a single time you have sent a text that you would not want someone else to see?
Give it a rest. This was for the best.
Not really answering, right?
You are saying that sometimes looking at people's communications without consent can be a good thing? So we should do it to learn more about the people in our lives?
I look at everything and it has served me well in life. Full access.
PP here, and I am sincerely fascinated by this take. So basically, you do not "respect privacy"? If you ever have the opportunity to look at spouse/family member/friend/child communications with other, whether email text or phone, you take it?
Privacy is an illusion that I don’t care about. I can get full access to any information that I want. The truth is out there.
Interesting. Do you apply this to yourself as well? Never expect anything in your own life to be private?
If so, I assume that if we could identify you in this thread, and then tell everyone in your life that all of your communications with them would be made public, that would be cool with you? Even if somebody made them public by publishing all of your text messages, that would be unobjectionable?
DP. Why do you have your panties in such a bunch? Do you write nasty things about one of your kids behind their backs and this hits too close to the bone?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You were .... snooping on your mom's phone? Are you 12?
And thank goodness she did.
OP, this will help you avoid years of frustration.
Do you advise that people in general look at messages that were not intended for them?
Can you think of a single time you have sent a text that you would not want someone else to see?
Give it a rest. This was for the best.
Not really answering, right?
You are saying that sometimes looking at people's communications without consent can be a good thing? So we should do it to learn more about the people in our lives?
I look at everything and it has served me well in life. Full access.
PP here, and I am sincerely fascinated by this take. So basically, you do not "respect privacy"? If you ever have the opportunity to look at spouse/family member/friend/child communications with other, whether email text or phone, you take it?
Privacy is an illusion that I don’t care about. I can get full access to any information that I want. The truth is out there.
Interesting. Do you apply this to yourself as well? Never expect anything in your own life to be private?
If so, I assume that if we could identify you in this thread, and then tell everyone in your life that all of your communications with them would be made public, that would be cool with you? Even if somebody made them public by publishing all of your text messages, that would be unobjectionable?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You were .... snooping on your mom's phone? Are you 12?
And thank goodness she did.
OP, this will help you avoid years of frustration.
Do you advise that people in general look at messages that were not intended for them?
Can you think of a single time you have sent a text that you would not want someone else to see?
Give it a rest. This was for the best.
Not really answering, right?
You are saying that sometimes looking at people's communications without consent can be a good thing? So we should do it to learn more about the people in our lives?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You were .... snooping on your mom's phone? Are you 12?
And thank goodness she did.
OP, this will help you avoid years of frustration.
Do you advise that people in general look at messages that were not intended for them?
Can you think of a single time you have sent a text that you would not want someone else to see?
Give it a rest. This was for the best.
Not really answering, right?
You are saying that sometimes looking at people's communications without consent can be a good thing? So we should do it to learn more about the people in our lives?
I look at everything and it has served me well in life. Full access.
PP here, and I am sincerely fascinated by this take. So basically, you do not "respect privacy"? If you ever have the opportunity to look at spouse/family member/friend/child communications with other, whether email text or phone, you take it?
Privacy is an illusion that I don’t care about. I can get full access to any information that I want. The truth is out there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You were .... snooping on your mom's phone? Are you 12?
And thank goodness she did.
OP, this will help you avoid years of frustration.
Do you advise that people in general look at messages that were not intended for them?
Can you think of a single time you have sent a text that you would not want someone else to see?
Give it a rest. This was for the best.
Not really answering, right?
You are saying that sometimes looking at people's communications without consent can be a good thing? So we should do it to learn more about the people in our lives?
I look at everything and it has served me well in life. Full access.
PP here, and I am sincerely fascinated by this take. So basically, you do not "respect privacy"? If you ever have the opportunity to look at spouse/family member/friend/child communications with other, whether email text or phone, you take it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You were .... snooping on your mom's phone? Are you 12?
And thank goodness she did.
OP, this will help you avoid years of frustration.
Do you advise that people in general look at messages that were not intended for them?
Can you think of a single time you have sent a text that you would not want someone else to see?
Give it a rest. This was for the best.
Not really answering, right?
You are saying that sometimes looking at people's communications without consent can be a good thing? So we should do it to learn more about the people in our lives?
I look at everything and it has served me well in life. Full access.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Absence makes the heart grow fonder
AND
Familiarity breeds contempt.
The caregiving children are generally the most obedient, compliant ones and as a result, leave themselves open to all sorts of hectoring and criticism from their parents that the non-caregiving children, the ones with a more independent streak, would never tolerate. The parents feel they can abuse the caregiving, helpful ones, and they feel they have to ingratiate themselves with their more independent kids to receive help from them.
My husband is the golden child who lives abroad, far away from his family. My MIL worships him. She complains about her two other sons to him. Mind you, one of those two used to live with her and help her day in, day out, with her meds, and help her on walks, manage her appointments and therapy, etc... and that is exactly the one who gets criticized the most!
I've seen it in my own family too, OP. The one who is closest, most dutiful and submissive gets the bad rap (my aunts), and the one who swoops in to visit every few years is welcomed home like the prodigal son (my father).
So.
If they want to live near you, or with you, DO NOT LET THAT HAPPEN. On the contrary, please do your utmost to disengage and let your parent live close to the golden child. Let's see how they get on...![]()
So, if OP were your BIL, of BIL's spouse, you would advocate that your MIL move closer to you?
Also, they live in a country where care is cheaper, so my MIL is definitely better looked after there than in the US. In our home country, she can afford round the clock care in her own home. Here, her quality of life would be much degraded.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You were .... snooping on your mom's phone? Are you 12?
And thank goodness she did.
OP, this will help you avoid years of frustration.
Do you advise that people in general look at messages that were not intended for them?
Can you think of a single time you have sent a text that you would not want someone else to see?
Give it a rest. This was for the best.
Not really answering, right?
You are saying that sometimes looking at people's communications without consent can be a good thing? So we should do it to learn more about the people in our lives?
Anonymous wrote:OP, if this is in keeping with how you have been treated with them, then do not encourage them to move near you. Start talking about how you and your spouse might be moving for work. Encourage them to move near your brother. Don’t get stuck with elder care for people who don’t care enough for you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You were .... snooping on your mom's phone? Are you 12?
And thank goodness she did.
OP, this will help you avoid years of frustration.
Do you advise that people in general look at messages that were not intended for them?
Can you think of a single time you have sent a text that you would not want someone else to see?
Give it a rest. This was for the best.
Anonymous wrote:
Absence makes the heart grow fonder
AND
Familiarity breeds contempt.
The caregiving children are generally the most obedient, compliant ones and as a result, leave themselves open to all sorts of hectoring and criticism from their parents that the non-caregiving children, the ones with a more independent streak, would never tolerate. The parents feel they can abuse the caregiving, helpful ones, and they feel they have to ingratiate themselves with their more independent kids to receive help from them.
My husband is the golden child who lives abroad, far away from his family. My MIL worships him. She complains about her two other sons to him. Mind you, one of those two used to live with her and help her day in, day out, with her meds, and help her on walks, manage her appointments and therapy, etc... and that is exactly the one who gets criticized the most!
I've seen it in my own family too, OP. The one who is closest, most dutiful and submissive gets the bad rap (my aunts), and the one who swoops in to visit every few years is welcomed home like the prodigal son (my father).
So.
If they want to live near you, or with you, DO NOT LET THAT HAPPEN. On the contrary, please do your utmost to disengage and let your parent live close to the golden child. Let's see how they get on...![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You were .... snooping on your mom's phone? Are you 12?
And thank goodness she did.
OP, this will help you avoid years of frustration.
Do you advise that people in general look at messages that were not intended for them?
Can you think of a single time you have sent a text that you would not want someone else to see?