Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are there just 2 ECNL clubs in Carolina? That explains a lot as to why they are good. What if there were only 2 ECNL options in all of Virginia?
No. There are 6 ecnl clubs in NC. 7 in VA. I think the point is that in Raleigh, the 2 ecnl clubs don’t poach from each other like they do in NoVa. More of a 1a and 1b team so they can concentrate their talent into 1 dominant team. If NoVa could do this, it would be like 7-8 years ago when a local team would be competing for nationals (e.g., McLean)
NCFC is NC Courage’s 2nd team.
CSA has 11 branches in the Charlotte/South Carolina area.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are there just 2 ECNL clubs in Carolina? That explains a lot as to why they are good. What if there were only 2 ECNL options in all of Virginia?
No. There are 6 ecnl clubs in NC. 7 in VA. I think the point is that in Raleigh, the 2 ecnl clubs don’t poach from each other like they do in NoVa. More of a 1a and 1b team so they can concentrate their talent into 1 dominant team. If NoVa could do this, it would be like 7-8 years ago when a local team would be competing for nationals (e.g., McLean)
Anonymous wrote:Are there just 2 ECNL clubs in Carolina? That explains a lot as to why they are good. What if there were only 2 ECNL options in all of Virginia?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nerds!
Yes, I am a data nerd! Thanks for the recognition.
Anonymous wrote:NVA has the highest win %?
Keep in mind that the winning percentage is based on games played by each team, which is quite varied at this point of the season. Winning percentage doesn't mean a heck of a lot until every club has played all their games. But several threads on this board have posters making broad claims about this club winning more than that club, hence the focus on wins in the original post.
Anonymous wrote:If you think winning percentage is an important part of youth sports, at any level, you are part of the problem.
I actually don't think winning percentage is at all important for individual player assessment, but you would have to admit there are lots of debates on this board related to the quality of clubs and quality of coaching. I do believe that better clubs tend to have (or develop) better players, and teams with better coaching are positively correlated to wining more games. I don't disagree with your point that win/loss records are more of a distraction to the broader purpose of youth sports. One reason I kept this data at the club level was to see if any clubs separated themselves on average from other clubs across most age groups. Why are NC Courage and Charlotte SA a step up from other clubs in the same region? Maybe it’s the water down there? Or maybe these clubs are better at developing and using the talent they have? Maybe they just got lucky?
Anonymous wrote:Arlington 2011 girls have actually gotten better, not worse. One of their best goal scorers is new this season.
Anonymous wrote:Arlington 2011 girls have actually gotten better, not worse. One of their best goal scorers is new this season.
Anonymous wrote:Arlington 2011 girls have actually gotten better, not worse. One of their best goal scorers is new this season.
Anonymous wrote:Nerds!
Anonymous wrote:NVA has the highest win %?
Anonymous wrote:If you think winning percentage is an important part of youth sports, at any level, you are part of the problem.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For girls, I'd just average U15/U16/U17 to get an idea of strength. U18/19 can really drop off, because most of the better girls have already signed. Before U15 is still very much developmental and not always a fair reflection. Some clubs are more "win first" than others at the younger ages.
NP, and this makes no sense. ECNL starts at a certain age for a reason. I’m all for leaving out pre-ECNL, but once they’re playing 11v11, leaving out certain age groups ignores a big piece of the picture. Arlington 2011s are a perfect case in point.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For girls, I'd just average U15/U16/U17 to get an idea of strength. U18/19 can really drop off, because most of the better girls have already signed. Before U15 is still very much developmental and not always a fair reflection. Some clubs are more "win first" than others at the younger ages.
NP, and this makes no sense. ECNL starts at a certain age for a reason. I’m all for leaving out pre-ECNL, but once they’re playing 11v11, leaving out certain age groups ignores a big piece of the picture. Arlington 2011s are a perfect case in point.